Deranged Rhino Posted November 27, 2018 Author Posted November 27, 2018 Just now, Kevbeau said: Holy $&!@ if that’s true Agreed. All of OC turned blue - despite voting for the GOP governor by over 6k votes. Color me skeptical. (of the election's integrity that is)
3rdnlng Posted November 27, 2018 Posted November 27, 2018 32 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Agreed. All of OC turned blue - despite voting for the GOP governor by over 6k votes. Color me skeptical. (of the election's integrity that is) Do you mean in Congressional races?
Deranged Rhino Posted November 27, 2018 Author Posted November 27, 2018 6 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Do you mean in Congressional races? Yessir. Sorry, should have clarified.
3rdnlng Posted November 27, 2018 Posted November 27, 2018 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Yessir. Sorry, should have clarified. Where did that Korean-American woman win? 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: Weren't eligible, by whose determination? In which races? DR has a lot of 'splainin to do.
DC Tom Posted November 27, 2018 Posted November 27, 2018 3 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: DR has a lot of 'splainin to do. No need. I posted before I read further, which is why I deleted my post. Or one of the reasons why. The other was to piss off Azalin.
Azalin Posted November 28, 2018 Posted November 28, 2018 5 hours ago, DC Tom said: No need. I posted before I read further, which is why I deleted my post. Or one of the reasons why. The other was to piss off Azalin. 1
Hedge Posted November 28, 2018 Posted November 28, 2018 13 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Prisoner sextortion ring targeting members of the US Military 1
Deranged Rhino Posted November 28, 2018 Author Posted November 28, 2018 This stuff (sadly) is very real, very systemic, and often protected by those up on high. https://newspunch.com/former-democrat-chairman-videos-abuse/ More breaking today on Epstein... it's framed as being Acosta's fault (not that one), which he shares a large portion of the blame (and is going to be ousted) - but who was the FBI head at the time who pulled the strings? Mueller. Long thread: (funny - it won't let me post this tweet thread from the Miami Herald)
DC Tom Posted November 28, 2018 Posted November 28, 2018 23 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: This stuff (sadly) is very real, very systemic, and often protected by those up on high. https://newspunch.com/former-democrat-chairman-videos-abuse/ More breaking today on Epstein... it's framed as being Acosta's fault (not that one), which he shares a large portion of the blame (and is going to be ousted) - but who was the FBI head at the time who pulled the strings? Mueller. Long thread: (funny - it won't let me post this tweet thread from the Miami Herald) The replies are funny. Bunch of Clinton supporters complaining about Trump's ties to Epstein. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted November 28, 2018 Author Posted November 28, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: The replies are funny. Bunch of Clinton supporters complaining about Trump's ties to Epstein. Yup. And for clarity (now that I've read it in full) the Herald piece leaves out who was really pulling the strings for Epstein's case to be dismissed. It wasn't "nameless prosecutors", but Mueller and the Clintons.
Deranged Rhino Posted November 28, 2018 Author Posted November 28, 2018 Wonder what's hidden in the Vatican's archives personally... 1
DC Tom Posted November 28, 2018 Posted November 28, 2018 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Wonder what's hidden in the Vatican's archives personally... Actual children, probably. 3
Foxx Posted November 29, 2018 Posted November 29, 2018 (edited) https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1068269270386204672 https://twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1068272019597332489 Edited November 29, 2018 by Foxx 2
Buffalo_Gal Posted November 29, 2018 Posted November 29, 2018 10 minutes ago, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1068269270386204672 Huh. Trying to run out the clock on the House, but the Senate is taking over the investigation. So what is he really trying to accomplish, Mr I-can't-wait-to-tesitfy? 1
Nanker Posted November 29, 2018 Posted November 29, 2018 He will only testify in a public forum so the MSM can fixate their reporting on his red plaid flannel jammies and his pink puttur cap while opining about if he’s switched to chamomile tea, oh Lordy. 1
3rdnlng Posted November 30, 2018 Posted November 30, 2018 1 hour ago, Nanker said: He will only testify in a public forum so the MSM can fixate their reporting on his red plaid flannel jammies and his pink puttur cap while opining about if he’s switched to chamomile tea, oh Lordy. No, in public he can grandstand and also claim that he can't answer certain questions in that forum.
DC Tom Posted November 30, 2018 Posted November 30, 2018 13 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: The uranium deal is lots of screaming for no big deal. Skolkovo...that is a big deal. The Clinton State Department gave the Russians the money and technology to "hack" the election in 2016. I am amazed that doesn't get more press. 2
Gavin in Va Beach Posted November 30, 2018 Posted November 30, 2018 7 hours ago, DC Tom said: The uranium deal is lots of screaming for no big deal. Skolkovo...that is a big deal. The Clinton State Department gave the Russians the money and technology to "hack" the election in 2016. I am amazed that doesn't get more press. The uranium deal viewed in conjunction with the infusion of money into the Clinton Foundation is a quid pro quo and pretty big deal, but I agree Skolkovo is huge and borderline if not outright treason. Can you imagine if those two things were done by a Republican? The media would have incited a mob to have built a gallows in front of the Capitol by now. 2
Recommended Posts