Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 


And this is why the time is now to destroy the infrastructures that would enable that kind of dark future, and to scatter them to the wind. Unfortunately, the Republicans are too cowardly to do what is necessary.

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said:


And this is why the time is now to destroy the infrastructures that would enable that kind of dark future, and to scatter them to the wind. Unfortunately, the Republicans are too cowardly to do what is necessary.

 

 

Republicans are too cowardly to seize or destroy the property of private citizens they disagree with, and begin to prosecute thought crimes?

 

Thank God.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

Republicans are too cowardly to seize or destroy the property of private citizens they disagree with, and begin to prosecute thought crimes?

 

Thank God.


Well, then, be prepared for the Democrats to do that very thing.

 

Hope you enjoy socialism. You won't have much of a choice.

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

They think you're stupid.

 

Talk about projecting...

 

They're literally accusing the President of all the crimes they themselves are guilty of.

1 minute ago, Joe in Winslow said:


Well, then, be prepared for the Democrats to do that very thing.

 

Hope you enjoy socialism. You won't have much of a choice.

 

 

This is a stupid post.  Staggeringly so.

Posted
1 minute ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

This is a stupid post.  Staggeringly so.

 

Oh really? Did you read the article attached to that tweet? I'm guessing not. If you did, and you weren't horrified, then you might want to check your pulse.

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Joe in Winslow said:

 

Oh really? Did you read the article attached to that tweet? I'm guessing not. If you did, and you weren't horrified, then you might want to check your pulse.

 

 

 

I did, and I find the authors ideas horrifying.

 

I find them equally horrifying when expressed by you.

 

Bad ideas are bad ideas, Joe.

Posted
Just now, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

I did, and I find the authors ideas horrifying.

 

I find them equally horrifying when expressed by you.

 

Bad ideas are bad ideas, Joe.

 

I'm a believer in degrees of evil.

 

The highest degree of evil anyone's EVER conceived of is a one-party socialist society. It's a FAR worse outcome than literally ANY other outcome. See: Venezuela, Mao's China, Cambodia, USSR.

 

If I'm forced into the hypothetical position of taking radical action to ensure THAT outcome doesn't happen, I'm choosing those actions 100% of the time. Of course, I'd prefer it not have to come to that, but it's my belief that if the left gets a hold on power in this country, they'll do everything in their power to not relinquish it again. Furthermore, I believe that each successive generation is more degenerate than the last, and more likely to embrace socialism. See: millenial idiocy.

 

 

Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said:

 

I'm a believer in degrees of evil.

 

The highest degree of evil anyone's EVER conceived of is a one-party socialist society. It's a FAR worse outcome than literally ANY other outcome. See: Venezuela, Mao's China, Cambodia, USSR.

 

If I'm forced into the hypothetical position of taking radical action to ensure THAT outcome doesn't happen, I'm choosing those actions 100% of the time. Of course, I'd prefer it not have to come to that, but it's my belief that if the left gets a hold on power in this country, they'll do everything in their power to not relinquish it again. Furthermore, I believe that each successive generation is more degenerate than the last, and more likely to embrace socialism. See: millenial idiocy.

 

You're legitimizing their argument and tactics, Joe.

 

You're literally advocating for brutal dictatorship, Joe; and you're legitimizing the prosecution of thought crimes, and somehow even worse, advocating entrusting that power to government without even so much as due process.

 

That's not recipe for anything other than brutal oppression.

 

Maybe they'll name a gulag after you?

Edited by TakeYouToTasker
Posted
Just now, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

You're making their argument viable, and legitimizing their tactic all at the same time.

 

You're literally advocating for brutal dictatorship, Joe; and you're legitimizing the prosecution of thought crimes, and somehow even worse, advocating entrusting that power to government without even so much as due process.

 

That's not recipe for anything other than brutal oppression.

 

Maybe they'll name a gulag after you?

 

Better, in your mind, to be led like a sheep to the slaughter? Good luck.

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Joe in Winslow said:

 

Better, in your mind, to be led like a sheep to the slaughter? Good luck.

 

Better in my mind to fight against anyone advocating brutal leftist oppressors, be their name Jack Dorsey or Joe in Winslow.

Posted
1 minute ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

Better in my mind to fight against anyone advocating brutal leftist oppressors, be their name Jack Dorsey or Joe in Winslow.

 

:lol: I'm a leftist, huh?

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Joe in Winslow said:

 

:lol: I'm a leftist, huh?

 

You're advocating entrusting the state with absolute unaccountable authority to crush political opposition without due process.

 

Yes, you're a leftist.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

U.S. prosecutors oppose request for unsealing possible Assange charges
 

Federal prosecutors have told a United States District Court judge that they oppose a request by a journalists’ group for the unsealing of any pending U.S. criminal indictment against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, and declined to admit whether such charges exist.

<snip>
 

Then today:
 

US judge to rule on whether to unseal complaint against Julian Assange
 

* WikiLeaks founder reportedly charged in secret
* Prosecutors inadvertently alluded to charges in 
unrelated case
 

<snip>

  • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...