Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Gleeful Gator's humor almost overshadows his stupidity. There was nothing wrong with anyone from the Trump campaign meeting with any Russian nationals to get "dirt" on Hillary Clinton. They would have been fools to not at least listen. The Person Who Laughs At American Deaths tries very hard to connect dots that just can't be connected. Watching him try is like watching the cat try to catch my infrared light.

Posted
9 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Gleeful Gator's humor almost overshadows his stupidity. There was nothing wrong with anyone from the Trump campaign meeting with any Russian nationals to get "dirt" on Hillary Clinton. They would have been fools to not at least listen. The Person Who Laughs At American Deaths tries very hard to connect dots that just can't be connected. Watching him try is like watching the cat try to catch my infrared light.

You are repeating Trump's talking points. 

 

But they are sick, treasonous points. 

 

And spreading lies about me? Well, that's 3rd thing for ya. A liar who loves a liar. 

 

Cats can't see infrared light, you idiot. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

You are repeating Trump's talking points. 

 

But they are sick, treasonous points. 

 

And spreading lies about me? Well, that's 3rd thing for ya. A liar who loves a liar. 

 

Cats can't see infrared light, you idiot. 

Those may or may not be Trump's points but I can assure you that they are mine. Until I sold them to a Chinese restaurant my ex had two cats that I would tease with my infrared measuring tool. Wrong again.

Posted (edited)

 

&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*

 

 

15 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Game on. 

 

 

 

The indictment is likely for this, not 2016: 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/leaked-chat-logs-may-used-prove-julian-assange-directed-hackers-204302522.html

 

Whatever information Assange has on 2016 will likely be dangled as leverage in whatever deal they're making behind closed doors.


*********************************************

 

Not a coincidence this happens at the same time as the Assange indictment leaks:

 

Edited by Deranged Rhino
Posted
2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Things that make me go, hmmm

 

 

 

She's been very involved and vocal for years. Now she can't comment. 

 

I really don't care who thinks he's a hero.  He's still "Assmange" to me.

Posted
4 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

I really don't care who thinks he's a hero.  He's still "Assmange" to me.

 

With Assange (to me) there is no black and white, it's all gray. He's got blood on his hands. But he's not a Putin cut-out or Russian asset. 

 

He's also the only person with the physical evidence/forensic evidence necessary to prove the origin of the Podesta/DCCC emails. Is he using that to cut a deal on his other sins for a "time served" arrangement?

 

I guess we'll see. 

Posted

Earlier, the WaPo came out (again) with wild claims about MBS's direct involvement in the killing of an AQ asset - including a phone call immediately after the killing.

 

They were anonymously sourced (Turkish news sources, of course) that have since been proven to inaccurate. 

 

 

 

WaPo continues to primarily push (dis)information.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 


He needs a better delivery. Siri sounds more human.

So my question... will Hillary or Obama be charged with treason? (I thought it was a gun running mission myself.)

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


He needs a better delivery. Siri sounds more human.

So my question... will Hillary or Obama be charged with treason? (I thought it was a gun running mission myself.)

 

I had always heard Trump wanted to give 44 a pass (being a former POTUS) - but that was before 44 decided to become more vocal than any other former ex president in history during an election cycle. 

 

We'll find out pretty soon how high he's going to take this whole thing. The political spying operation run in '16 (and beforehand) ultimately ends at 44's desk, so if they want to bring the hammer down they have more than enough evidence to do so. The question is can they do so without instigating a civil war in return. I think that's the equation being debated/worked out.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

I had always heard Trump wanted to give 44 a pass (being a former POTUS) - but that was before 44 decided to become more vocal than any other former ex president in history during an election cycle. 

 

We'll find out pretty soon how high he's going to take this whole thing. The political spying operation run in '16 (and beforehand) ultimately ends at 44's desk, so if they want to bring the hammer down they have more than enough evidence to do so. The question is can they do so without instigating a civil war in return. I think that's the equation being debated/worked out.

I'm.for.civil war if it thins the herd out. Except the good guys will get nuked.

Edited by Boyst62
×
×
  • Create New...