Jump to content

The Deep State War Heats Up :ph34r:


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Taro T said:

 

She supports whatever is politically expedient.  Always has, always will.  That she turned on an ally in what seemed a matter of minutes was par for the course.

She is definitely a phony.  It is no surprise she turned on Schneiderman.  It would be equally unsurprising to find out that she had heard of his proclivities long ago.  What would surprise me would be if she was connected to NXIVM.

 

Would it surprise me if NXIVM had dirt on Schneiderman and others that prevented his office from taking action?   Nope.  Most of the links on this topic have been speculation and supposition but the one from Greggy above has some real stuff:

 

 

Quote

 

https://www.timesunion.com/local/article/Law-enforcement-has-fielded-NXIVM-complaints-for-12348611.php

 

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman's office has begun examining NXIVM's dealings, according to two people with knowledge of the matter. The new interest comes after multiple law enforcement agencies, including Schneiderman's office, had for years brushed aside the concerns from Raniere's critics and others about the murky inner workings of NXIVM, which one expert has characterized as an "extreme cult." A spokesman for Schneiderman did not respond to questions about the investigation

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

She is definitely a phony.  It is no surprise she turned on Schneiderman.  It would be equally unsurprising to find out that she had heard of his proclivities long ago.  What would surprise me would be if she was connected to NXIVM.

 

Would it surprise me if NXIVM had dirt on Schneiderman and others that prevented his office from taking action?   Nope.  Most of the links on this topic have been speculation and supposition but the one from Greggy above has some real stuff:

 

 

 

 

And this

 

"reported allegations that Bronfman, who has been described as NXIVM's operations director, paid a Canadian private investigative firm to examine the banking records of U.S. federal judges and others, including journalists."

 

And this too...

 

"Each and every time someone says, 'Look at NXIVM,' they become the brunt of the investigation. It's happened to me four or five times," Foley said, referring in part to a computer-trespass charge filed against her and three others by State Police in 2012 based on allegations from NXIVM. The charges were later dismissed against Foley, O'Hara and Bouchey.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Taro T said:

 

She supports whatever is politically expedient.  Always has, always will.  That she turned on an ally in what seemed a matter of minutes was par for the course.

 

She is covering her ass by releasing statements condemning him before people start remembering her ringing endorsements.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking the recent string in frequency of "young models" being found dead with Rich powerful men is something of a warmup to what news may come. This piece of ass who just died in Florida with some 41 yr old doctor is another example. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, OJABBA said:

 

And this

 

"reported allegations that Bronfman, who has been described as NXIVM's operations director, paid a Canadian private investigative firm to examine the banking records of U.S. federal judges and others, including journalists."

 

And this too...

 

"Each and every time someone says, 'Look at NXIVM,' they become the brunt of the investigation. It's happened to me four or five times," Foley said, referring in part to a computer-trespass charge filed against her and three others by State Police in 2012 based on allegations from NXIVM. The charges were later dismissed against Foley, O'Hara and Bouchey.

 

And more on the Bronfman clan... the brother was a regular on Epstein's island (as were the Clintons).

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Trump Land Mine

by Victor Davis Hanson

 

After the 2016 election, the so-called deep state was confident that it had the power easily to either stop, remove, or delegitimize the outlier Donald Trump and his presidency.

 

Give it credit, the Washington apparat quite imaginatively pulled out all the stops: implanting Obama holdover appointees all over the Trump executive branch; filing lawsuits and judge shopping; organizing the Resistance; pursuing impeachment writs; warping the FISA courts; weaponizing the DOJ and FBI; attempting to disrupt the Electoral College; angling for enactment of the 25th Amendment or the emoluments clause; and unleashing Hollywood celebrities, Silicon Valley, and many in Wall Street to suffocate the Trump presidency in its infancy.

 

But now the administrative state’s multifaceted efforts are starting to unwind, and perhaps even boomerang, on the perpetrators. If a federal judge should end up throwing out most of the indictments of Paul Manafort on the rationale that they have nothing much to do with the original mandate of the special counsel’s office, or if Michael Flynn’s confession to giving false statements is withdrawn successfully because the FBI politicized its investigation and FISA courts were misled in approving the surveillance of Flynn, then the Mueller investigation will implode.

 

Indeed, the Mueller investigation would likely lose so much public support that the Department of Justice could probably dismiss it with impunity. So, in an ironic sense, Mueller’s overreach might well end once and for all the absurdities of the special counsel/prosecutor law that for nearly half a century has plagued the nation.

 

Until recently, deep-state apparatchiks such as John Brennan, James Clapper, James Comey, and Andrew McCabe seemed immune from accountability after lying either to Congress or to federal authorities. In a perverse sort of way, the more Robert Mueller plays the role of the obsessed but impotent Inspector Javert, the more he demonstrates that there is no Russian-Trump collusion.

 

Meanwhile, he is establishing precedents that those whom he exempts from his own zeal will inevitably have to account for their own lawbreaking. One cannot justifiably hound Michael Flynn for supposedly misleading FBI agents, when agency investigators were told by Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills that they had known nothing about Hillary Clinton’s private server during her tenure as secretary of state — despite evidence that they themselves had communicated over it (as had the former president of the United States).

More at the Link:

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/05/president-trump-deep-state-critics-risk-blowback/

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On May 8, 2018 at 1:59 PM, Deranged Rhino said:

 

And more on the Bronfman clan... the brother was a regular on Epstein's island (as were the Clintons).

 

 

Looks like good 'OL Jimmy Buffet was strummin' on more than just his six string and looking for more than his lost shaker of salt.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

:lol: 

 

With friends like that, Kerry doesn't need enemies. 

 

http://en.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13970217000956

 

 

"... the United States is not just the current ruling administration and there are many figures who have different views on international and regional issues," Foreign Ministry Spokesman Bahram Qassemi said."

 

Apparently John Kerry agrees with Qassemi, with one important distinction.  Constitutionally speaking, international diplomacy is conducted at the direction of our Executive branch, and while Qassemi is free to disagree, John Kerry is not.

 

Kerry is not Constitutionally empowered to engage in shadow diplomacy against the wishes of the Executive, and presenting a differing policy agenda.  We have one government, and Kerry, in attempting to represent it, is engaging in treason.

Edited by TakeYouToTasker
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

"... the United States is not just the current ruling administration and there are many figures who have different views on international and regional issues," Foreign Ministry Spokesman Bahram Qassemi said."

 

Apparently John Kerry agrees with Qassemi, with one important distinction.  Constitutionally speaking, international diplomacy is conducted at the direction of our Executive branch, and while Qassemi is free to disagree, John Kerry is not.

 

Kerry is not Constitutionally empowered to engage in shadow diplomacy against the wishes of the Executive, and presenting a differing policy agenda.  We have one government, and Kerry, in attempting to represent it, is engaging in treason.

But, it's John Kerry and Donald Trump is a Nazi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

"... the United States is not just the current ruling administration and there are many figures who have different views on international and regional issues," Foreign Ministry Spokesman Bahram Qassemi said."

 

Apparently John Kerry agrees with Qassemi, with one important distinction.  Constitutionally speaking, international diplomacy is conducted at the direction of our Executive branch, and while Qassemi is free to disagree, John Kerry is not.

 

Kerry is not Constitutionally empowered to engage in shadow diplomacy against the wishes of the Executive, and presenting a differing policy agenda.  We have one government, and Kerry, in attempting to represent it, is engaging in treason.

 

Kerry should have been hanged for treason in the 70s. He definitely needs to be now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

"... the United States is not just the current ruling administration and there are many figures who have different views on international and regional issues," Foreign Ministry Spokesman Bahram Qassemi said."

 

Apparently John Kerry agrees with Qassemi, with one important distinction.  Constitutionally speaking, international diplomacy is conducted at the direction of our Executive branch, and while Qassemi is free to disagree, John Kerry is not.

 

Kerry is not Constitutionally empowered to engage in shadow diplomacy against the wishes of the Executive, and presenting a differing policy agenda.  We have one government, and Kerry, in attempting to represent it, is engaging in treason.

 

4 hours ago, joesixpack said:

 

Kerry should have been hanged for treason in the 70s. He definitely needs to be now.

 

Remember Change.org?  Website where people could start a petition and once it got so many votes the Obama administration would respond?

I kinda want to start a petition on Change.org to have John Kerry charged with violation of the Logan Act

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...