The Deep State War Heats Up :ph34r:

[TakeYouToTasker]

36 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Here's a hint as to my question above - and ties in to your question:

 

This is why you don't go to war based on videos or pictures alone:

 

https://streamable.com/ysxpb

 

Notice anything?

 

Are you talking about the Free Syrian Army involvement in propaganda designed to topple Assad, and McCain's direct involvement with them?

[Deranged Rhino]

1 minute ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

Are you talking about the Free Syrian Army involvement in propaganda designed to topple Assad, and McCain's direct involvement with them?

 

Not just direct involvement... look at his lapel. 

 

A sitting US senator wearing a VERY specific pin. It's not a Syrian pin. It's AQ (essentially)... A sitting US Senator wearing the pin of an enemy who slaughtered 3,000+ Americans on our own soil while he meets with them to cut an arms deal.

 

Never thought I'd be rooting for cancer.

[Deranged Rhino]

 

"could be"...  

[GaryPinC]

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Not just direct involvement... look at his lapel. 

 

A sitting US senator wearing a VERY specific pin. It's not a Syrian pin. It's AQ (essentially)... A sitting US Senator wearing the pin of an enemy who slaughtered 3,000+ Americans on our own soil while he meets with them to cut an arms deal.

 

Never thought I'd be rooting for cancer.

   That photo was reportedly taken while McCain was on a trip to Syria to meet with the Free Syrian Army.  Look at his label pin.  It's a flag.  Difficult to see, but it appears to have stripes with the top one lighter (possibly green).  Bottom stripe black, appear to be 3 stars across the middle white stripe.

 

So, I don't know the truth of his pin.  I think it's a FSA flag which makes sense because that's who he's going to meet.  You, seem to think it's an AQ flag.  Which AQ flag has stripes?

Oh, here's the FSA flag.  Look carefully.  Do your own research.   

On 4/7/2018 at 4:49 PM, Deranged Rhino said:

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3747202/Paul-Ceglia-supposed-Facebook-founder-disappeared-2015-says-s-running-CIA-want-kill-knowledge-involved-social-media-site.html

 

Much more to come. The game is afoot, big month ahead.

 

 

Gary... this is nonsense. Respectfully. 

 

That's like saying the plan to stop a mass shooter from reloading his weapon is to provide him with a belt feeder and unlimited rounds. 

 

The plan was to help the Iranian government work around sanctions. That's not something one does for an enemy. That's something one does for an ally.

* Just like calling off DHS, FBI, and NSA from stopping Hezbollah from running guns, drugs, and humans in and out of the United States (see Operation Cassandra) was done to assuage the Mullahs.

* Just like exposing the US's role in Stuxnet (and the capabilities of the cyber toolkit) to the NYT through your favorite general was done to help the Mullahs.

* Just like paying out over $2B in cash and sanction relief in unmarked, untraceable Euros boarded onto cargo aircraft which do not all land in Tehran.

* Just like abusing the spying tools of the NSA and USIC to harass, blackmail, and extort AMERICAN reporters who dare to publish unfriendly reports on the Iranian deal. 

 

Obama's Iranian plan had nothing to do with preventing the Mullahs from getting a nuclear weapon and everything to do with helping them maintain power.

 

Aiding and abetting Hezbollah and the Mullahs is the legacy of Obama's Iranian foreign policy. Ask yourself why he was willing to risk so much to help the largest terrorist funding organization in the world... 

 

Truth is going to be hard for some to see.

The truth will be hardest to see for you because you put so much research and effort into creating your own truth.

The plan was to get Iran to give up its nuclear ambitions.  I am no fan of Obama, he wanted a deal with Iran in the worst way and may have stupidly ignored the results of Operation Cassandra to enable meeting his deal.  But to assume that he was knowingly and actively guilty of treason is just a little too far off the reservation for me.  Peace.  I do think there's some substance to Horowitz and the entire election scandal.  Most assuredly not as deep as you are convinced but we'll see and I have followed it and have enjoyed your work here posting documents. 

[Deranged Rhino]

6 minutes ago, GaryPinC said:

   That photo was reportedly taken while McCain was on a trip to Syria to meet with the Free Syrian Army.  Look at his label pin.  It's a flag.  Difficult to see, but it appears to have stripes with the top one lighter (possibly green).  Bottom stripe black, appear to be 3 stars across the middle white stripe.

 

So, I don't know the truth of his pin.  I think it's a FSA flag which makes sense because that's who he's going to meet.  You, seem to think it's an AQ flag.  Which AQ flag has stripes?

Oh, here's the FSA flag.  Look carefully.  Do your own research.   

 

 

If you don't know the truth of the pin, do more research. It's the FSA flag, not the Syrian flag... and the FSA in 2013 (and today) was being run in the battlefield by whom? 

 

AQ. 

 

Who was the funding and arms that Sid was arranging meant for? 

 

AQ. 

 

You think this is acceptable just because they changed their logo and name so Americans not paying attention wouldn't make the connection?

 

Or is it treason of the worst kind?

[Joe Miner]

2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Look closer at the picture posted above. Then reconsider your response.

 

 

Yes, I'd probably do the chick in the background.

[row_33]

2 hours ago, Koko78 said:

 

What the hell kind of Senator carries his own bag?

 

When Carter was President he would carry his own bags at the airport when the cameras were on, when they turned off he dropped them an his assistants picked them up to carry.

 

 

[boyst]

2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Not just direct involvement... look at his lapel. 

 

A sitting US senator wearing a VERY specific pin. It's not a Syrian pin. It's AQ (essentially)... A sitting US Senator wearing the pin of an enemy who slaughtered 3,000+ Americans on our own soil while he meets with them to cut an arms deal.

 

Never thought I'd be rooting for cancer.

4H?

[Deranged Rhino]

1 hour ago, Boyst62 said:

4H?

 

That would be less repulsive than a sitting senator forgoing the American pin for that of an enemy we launched not one, but several wars to fight, on his way to make a deal to get them funding and weapons from the USIC. 

 

He's a traitor of the highest order. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Cugalabanza]

It’s kind of hard to see in those pics.  Here’s a close-up...

 

[Deranged Rhino]

3 minutes ago, Cugalabanza said:

It’s kind of hard to see in those pics.  Here’s a close-up...

 

 

 

[Azalin]

11 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

https://streamable.com/ysxpb

 

Notice anything?

 

 

 

%&#$@#$&%$%#$@#$%$$%&!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[boyst]

20 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Here's a hint as to my question above - and ties in to your question:

 

This is why you don't go to war based on videos or pictures alone:

 

https://streamable.com/ysxpb

 

Notice anything?

MY response

 

[Deranged Rhino]

 

[DC Tom]

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

"Because he wants to monopolize the industry for himself!"  [/MSNBC]

[TakeYouToTasker]

[url=https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/1865/text]Text of the Bill[/url]

	AT THE SECOND SESSION   Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen   To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to clarify that section 230 of such Act does not prohibit the enforcement against providers and users of interactive computer services of Federal and State criminal and civil law relating to sexual exploitation of children or sex trafficking, and for other purposes.   Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the “Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017”. SEC. 2. Sense of congress. It is the sense of Congress that—   (1) section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 230; commonly known as the “Communications Decency Act of 1996”) was never intended to provide legal protection to websites that unlawfully promote and facilitate prostitution and websites that facilitate traffickers in advertising the sale of unlawful sex acts with sex trafficking victims;     (2) websites that promote and facilitate prostitution have been reckless in allowing the sale of sex trafficking victims and have done nothing to prevent the trafficking of children and victims of force, fraud, and coercion; and     (3) clarification of such section is warranted to ensure that such section does not provide such protection to such websites.   SEC. 3. Promotion of prostitution and reckless disregard of sex trafficking.   (a) Promotion of prostitution.—Chapter 117 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2421 the following:   “§ 2421A. Promotion or facilitation of prostitution and reckless disregard of sex trafficking       “(a) In general.—Whoever, using a facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, owns, manages, or operates an interactive computer service (as such term is defined in defined in section 230(f) the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 230(f))), or conspires or attempts to do so, with the intent to promote or facilitate the prostitution of another person shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both.     “(b) Aggravated violation.—Whoever, using a facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, owns, manages, or operates an interactive computer service (as such term is defined in defined in section 230(f) the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 230(f))), or conspires or attempts to do so, with the intent to promote or facilitate the prostitution of another person and—   “(1) promotes or facilitates the prostitution of 5 or more persons; or     “(2) acts in reckless disregard of the fact that such conduct contributed to sex trafficking, in violation of 1591(a),     shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for not more than 25 years, or both.       “(c) Civil recovery.—Any person injured by reason of a violation of section 2421A(b) may recover damages and reasonable attorneys’ fees in an action before any appropriate United States district court.     “(d) Mandatory restitution.—Notwithstanding sections 3663 or 3663A and in addition to any other civil or criminal penalties authorized by law, the court shall order restitution for any violation of subsection (b)(2). The scope and nature of such restitution shall be consistent with section 2327(b).     “(e) Affirmative Defense.—It shall be an affirmative defense to a charge of violating subsection (a), or subsection (b)(1) where the defendant proves, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the promotion or facilitation of prostitution is legal in the jurisdiction where the promotion or facilitation was targeted.”.       (b) Table of contents.—The table of contents for such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2421 the following:     “2421A. Promotion or facilitation of prostitution and reckless disregard of sex trafficking.”.     SEC. 4. Ensuring ability to enforce federal and state criminal and civil law relating to sex trafficking.   (a) In General.—Section 230(e) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 230(e)) is amended by adding at the end the following:   “(5) NO EFFECT ON SEX TRAFFICKING LAW.—Nothing in this section (other than subsection (c)(2)(A)) shall be construed to impair or limit—   “(A) any claim in a civil action brought under section 1595 of title 18, United States Code, if the conduct underlying the claim constitutes a violation of section 1591 of that title;     “(B) any charge in a criminal prosecution brought under State law if the conduct underlying the charge would constitute a violation of section 1591 of title 18, United States Code; or     “(C) any charge in a criminal prosecution brought under State law if the conduct underlying the charge would constitute a violation of section 2421A of title 18, United States Code, and promotion or facilitation of prostitution is illegal in the jurisdiction where the defendant’s promotion or facilitation of prostitution was targeted.”.           (b) Effective date.—The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and the amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply regardless of whether the conduct alleged occurred, or is alleged to have occurred, before, on, or after such date of enactment. SEC. 5. Ensuring Federal liability for publishing information designed to facilitate sex trafficking or otherwise facilitating sex trafficking. Section 1591(e) of title 18, United States Code, is amended—   (1) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs (5) and (6), respectively; and     (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:   “(4) The term ‘participation in a venture’ means knowingly assisting, supporting, or facilitating a violation of subsection (a)(1).”.       SEC. 6. Actions by State attorneys general.   (a) In general.—Section 1595 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:   “(d) In any case in which the attorney general of a State has reason to believe that an interest of the residents of that State has been or is threatened or adversely affected by any person who violates section 1591, the attorney general of the State, as parens patriae, may bring a civil action against such person on behalf of the residents of the State in an appropriate district court of the United States to obtain appropriate relief.”.       (b) Technical and conforming amendments.—Section 1595 of title 18, United States Code, is amended—   (1) in subsection (b)(1), by striking “this section” and inserting “subsection (a)”; and     (2) in subsection (c), in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “this section” and inserting “subsection (a)”.     SEC. 7. Savings clause. Nothing in this Act or the amendments made by this Act shall be construed to limit or preempt any civil action or criminal prosecution under Federal law or State law (including State statutory law and State common law) filed before or after the day before the date of enactment of this Act that was not limited or preempted by section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 230), as such section was in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act. SEC. 8. GAO Study. On the date that is 3 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study and submit to the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate, the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate, a report which includes the following:   (1) Information on each civil action brought pursuant to section 2421A(c) of title 18, United States Code, that resulted in an award of damages, including the amount claimed, the nature or description of the losses claimed to support the amount claimed, the losses proven, and the nature or description of the losses proven to support the amount awarded.     (2) Information on each civil action brought pursuant to section 2421A(c) of title 18, United States Code, that did not result in an award of damages, including—   (A) the amount claimed and the nature or description of the losses claimed to support the amount claimed; and     (B) whether the case was dismissed, and if the case was dismissed, information describing the reason for the dismissal.         (3) Information on each order of restitution entered pursuant to section 2421A(d) of title 18, United States Code, including—   (A) whether the defendant was a corporation or an individual;     (B) the amount requested by the Government and the justification for, and calculation of, the amount requested, if restitution was requested; and     (C) the amount ordered by the court and the justification for, and calculation of, the amount ordered.         (4) For each defendant convicted of violating section 2421A(b) of title 18, United States Code, that was not ordered to pay restitution—   (A) whether the defendant was a corporation or an individual;     (B) the amount requested by the Government, if restitution was requested; and     (C) information describing the reason that the court did not order restitution.       Attest:   Speaker of the House of Representatives.     Attest:   Vice President of the United States and    President of the Senate.

Edited April 11, 2018 by TakeYouToTasker

[Deranged Rhino]

First: http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/382714-clinton-advised-pompeo-to-stop-the-purge-of-state-dept

 

Then: http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/382765-pompeo-failed-to-disclose-ownership-in-business-connected-to-china

 

 

[/dev/null]

3 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

[url=https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/1865/text]Text of the Bill[/url]

	AT THE SECOND SESSION   Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen   To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to clarify that section 230 of such Act does not prohibit the enforcement against providers and users of interactive computer services of Federal and State criminal and civil law relating to sexual exploitation of children or sex trafficking, and for other purposes.   ... ... ...   (C) information describing the reason that the court did not order restitution.       Attest:   Speaker of the House of Representatives.     Attest:   Vice President of the United States and    President of the Senate.

 

They really should add a rider to this Bill limiting the President to a single scoop of ice cream

[Deranged Rhino]

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-congress-sextrafficking/trump-signs-law-to-punish-websites-for-sex-trafficking-idUSKBN1HI2KP

Quote

 

The signing occurred as Washington sharpens its scrutiny on technology companies, which have largely evaded regulation, for their use of privacy protections and consumer data. Mark Zuckerberg, the chief executive of Facebook Inc, has been testifying before lawmakers this week.

 

Silicon Valley has long opposed efforts to rewrite the Communications Decency Act, which protects companies from liability for content posted by their users and has been credited with fueling the sector’s growth for 20 years.

 

However, Facebook and other technology companies and lobbying groups mostly withdrew opposition to the legislation in recent months after negotiating changes that limited the bill’s potential impact.

 

Some technology companies fear the bill could signal more efforts to tighten regulation on the industry.

 

 

[DC Tom]

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-congress-sextrafficking/trump-signs-law-to-punish-websites-for-sex-trafficking-idUSKBN1HI2KP

 

 

I'm actually okay with protecting companies from liability for content posted by their users.

 

The problem is...Facebook can't have it both ways, claiming they own the data but are not responsible for it.