boyst Posted April 2, 2018 Share Posted April 2, 2018 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: About forty billion cows. Average cost $1600 ish. So $64 trillion? Dude got like Oprah and Diddy money Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 3, 2018 Share Posted April 3, 2018 1 hour ago, TakeYouToTasker said: I'd have gone with Mullah. MOO-lah. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 3, 2018 Share Posted April 3, 2018 9 minutes ago, DC Tom said: MOO-lah. No, no. I got it, I just liked the other direction more. If it makes you feel any better you still scored an audible groan. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 3, 2018 Share Posted April 3, 2018 6 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: If it makes you feel any better you still scored an audible groan. That's really, at most, all that pun deserved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted April 3, 2018 Share Posted April 3, 2018 On 4/1/2018 at 1:40 PM, Deranged Rhino said: This is the spin re the video - that it's all from Sinclaire group and its working Trump's favor. https://theconcourse.deadspin.com/how-americas-largest-local-tv-owner-turned-its-news-anc-1824233490/amp?__twitter_impression=true ??? First, it's NOT just the Sinclair channels that pushed that as you can see in the video if you dig. Second - since when has Trump been pro "traditional" media outlets? THEY THINK YOU ARE STUPID. For or a kicker - Deadline asks anoyomous whistle blowers to use their secure drop to submit information. Secure drop is not what it says. It's a backdoor for the IC to SILENCE whistleblowers. The creators of secure drop are all dead but one (Snowden). All died mysteriously but for John Barlow. Secure Drop is a honey pot of sorts - promising security and then delivering information and whistleblowers directly into the hands of the very people they're blowing the whistle on. This shite is sick. It's a valid question and I'm not sure you'll like my answer but I believe it to be the truth: They're sloppy because they're rushed. There's an avalanche of information about to break that's beyond political bickering but a genuine threat to the stability of the system that's been in place for the last 70 years. Look at the coverage (or lack thereof) of NXIVM. That's the tip of the iceberg. Correct. Read the deadline above - it's being pushed as just Sinclair stations, but it isn't. It's multiple corporate owners in addition to different affiliates. That doesn't make sense. Unless the other stations are also operated, but not owned by Sinclair. Its highly doubtful that non Sinclair affiliated stations would run with the same script, especially since they span all 4 broadcast networks. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted April 3, 2018 Share Posted April 3, 2018 4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: This is a big deal... https://mobile.twitter.com/Daroff/status/980917684811587584 Holy schiff! That is huge news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LA Grant Posted April 3, 2018 Share Posted April 3, 2018 9 hours ago, GG said: That doesn't make sense. Unless the other stations are also operated, but not owned by Sinclair. Its highly doubtful that non Sinclair affiliated stations would run with the same script, especially since they span all 4 broadcast networks. Not making sense in order to defend the indefensible is Rhino's specialty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 Should Trump reopen the 9-11 investigation so we can find out what really happened? https://stonecoldtruth.com/9-11-and-the-very-deep-state/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 8 hours ago, Tiberius said: Should Trump reopen the 9-11 investigation so we can find out what really happened? https://stonecoldtruth.com/9-11-and-the-very-deep-state/ What say you Tom? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 2 hours ago, /dev/null said: What say you Tom? Sorry, but as part of the 9/11 conspiracy, my NDA precludes me discussing the Deep State's involvement. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 Nunes Demands FBI and DOJ Turn Over Un-Redacted Documents. “Committee will pursue ‘all appropriate legal remedies, including seeking civil enforcement’ for noncompliance.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 41 minutes ago, B-Man said: Nunes Demands FBI and DOJ Turn Over Un-Redacted Documents. “Committee will pursue ‘all appropriate legal remedies, including seeking civil enforcement’ for noncompliance.” FBI is under Trump. Trump supreme overlord of classified information. Trump can down grade the documents to non classified, I would understand or at least permit access to Nunes and the committee. Not the best strategical play; better to let the full investigation by the "committee" occur. Nunes is politically posturing as he should and the "side" he's on already knows the cards of the criminal Democratic Party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 5, 2018 Author Share Posted April 5, 2018 They're not going to turn over documents being used in GJ or criminal proceedings by Huber or Sessions. We know there are multiple criminal investigations ongoing. Congress leaks like a sieve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 5, 2018 Author Share Posted April 5, 2018 Bye-bye, MZ: https://www.sfgate.com/business/article/Facebook-Says-Data-on-87-Million-People-May-Have-12805661.php?utm_campaign=twitter-tablet&utm_source=CMS Sharing Button&utm_medium=social Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: Bye-bye, MZ: https://www.sfgate.com/business/article/Facebook-Says-Data-on-87-Million-People-May-Have-12805661.php?utm_campaign=twitter-tablet&utm_source=CMS Sharing Button&utm_medium=social Am I the only one here who thinks this has only become an issue because the data was shared with the wrong party? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 5, 2018 Author Share Posted April 5, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: Am I the only one here who thinks this has only become an issue because the data was shared with the wrong party? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 2 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Am I the only one here who thinks this has only become an issue because the data was shared with the wrong party? You mean like my first comment on this topics? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 5, 2018 Author Share Posted April 5, 2018 Lots to say about this soon. https://disobedientmedia.com/2018/04/all-russiagate-roads-lead-to-london-as-evidence-emerges-of-joseph-mifsuds-links-to-uk-intelligence/ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Lots to say about this soon. https://disobedientmedia.com/2018/04/all-russiagate-roads-lead-to-london-as-evidence-emerges-of-joseph-mifsuds-links-to-uk-intelligence/ This would constitute an act of war by England, which would certainly justify the military tribunals you and I have been discussing. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 1 minute ago, GG said: You mean like my first comment on this topics? Uh...yeah, exactly. But beyond the "Obama did it" point...this is Facebook's business model. Collect everything they can about you, and sell the data. It's why they market their authorization as a service - you register to comment on an article on a newspaper website, you use your Facebook account to do it, and now Facebook knows you read that paper, what articles you read, when you read them and for how often. But that data's only worth anything if they sell access to it. That's not a Republican vs. Democrat thing. It's a "Holy ****, are people really too stupid to understand this is not a new thing? And weren't bothered that Exxon, PETA, Walmart, DoD, CNN, Fox, Sinclar, and who knows who else can mine the data just as easily?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts