Chef Jim Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 No, it was the FBI I'll take Why The Left STILL Doesn't Know Why Hillary Lost for $1,000 Alex. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 5, 2017 Author Share Posted January 5, 2017 I'll take Why The Left STILL Doesn't Know Why Hillary Lost for $1,000 Alex. Why did she? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 (edited) Why did she? She furthered the lies about Benghazi She obviously used her position at the state dept to raise money for the Clinton foundation She obviously installed a private email server so that she could conceal corrupt activity and not be under scrutiny She lied about the 2 points above Her health was obviously not good. She's an old out of shape worn out woman. Her policy positions on illegal immigration, debt, budgets, taxes, healthcare, a growing an economy and national security were inferior to her opponent She's not a likeable personality Her opponent out worked her campaigning in the critical states Bernie supporters were pissed that the DNC made efforts to suppress his campaign She displays the absolute worst traits in a politician. Not honest, plays politics with everything, totally partisan, enriches herself while in office She's secretive, limited her exposure to media and when she spoke everything was rehearsed and scripted, robotic and not genuine The country wanted changed from Obama's lousy presidency She constantly pandered to every various group and played the fairness and race cards rather than operating with an overall optimistic vision for the country She chose a lousy running mate Her campaign inner circle was full of people that concealed the real Hillary and did her dirty work and this was obvious to the public She acted as the entitled heir apparent candidate What did I miss? Edited January 5, 2017 by keepthefaith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 5, 2017 Author Share Posted January 5, 2017 She furthered the lies about Benghazi She obviously used her position at the state dept to raise money for the Clinton foundation She obviously installed a private email server so that she could conceal corrupt activity and not be under scrutiny She lied about the 2 points above Her health was obviously not good. She's an old out of shape worn out woman. Her policy positions on illegal immigration, debt, budgets, taxes, healthcare, a growing an economy and national security were inferior to her opponent She's not a likeable personality Her opponent out worked her campaigning in the critical states Bernie supporters were pissed that the DNC made efforts to suppress his campaign She displays the absolute worst traits in a politician. Not honest, plays politics with everything, totally partisan, enriches herself while in office She's secretive, limited her exposure to media and when she spoke everything was rehearsed and scripted, robotic and not genuine The country wanted changed from Obama's lousy presidency She constantly pandered to every various group and played the fairness and race cards rather than operating with an overall optimistic vision for the country She chose a lousy running mate Her campaign inner circle was full of people that concealed the real Hillary and did her dirty work and this was obvious to the public She acted as the entitled heir apparent candidate What did I miss? The country loves Obama! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 It’s a lot more fun, after all, to bemoan how you don’t understand those rednecks in “Real America” than to admit that your team failed. It’s certainly more soothing to blame your overflow of “sophistication” — who among us could possibly understand all those rubes? — than admit that your party’s health-care, foreign-policy, and national-security strategies aren’t exactly knocking the cover off the ball. Both before and after the election, J. D. Vance’s Hillbilly Elegy was widely cited, and sometimes even fetishized, as the key to understanding Donald Trump. The book, which highlights Vance’s upbringing in a dysfunctional “hillbilly” culture, is certainly worth reading as a window on a group of Americans, many of them Trump voters, who are too often overlooked. But it doesn’t explain the conservative suburban mother of four who voted for Trump. It doesn’t explain the upper-middle-class Trump voter, socked by Obamacare surcharges and hoping for a tax cut. It doesn’t explain the religious voter horrified by Health and Human Services rules — recently overturned in court — that could penalize doctors for refusing to perform gender-transition procedures. A week after the election, noting Trump’s surprising performance among college-educated voters, The New Republic’s Eric Sasson declared that these Americans might be “the most deplorable of them all.” The educated had absolutely no excuse for opposing Hillary Clinton, he wrote: “They’re not suffering or desperate, and have no concrete reason to hate the status quo or to feel like they are in decline.” There it is, folks. You’re either an ignorant hillbilly, or you had no sane reason not to vote for four more years of left-wing lockstep and a lady who might go down in history as the worst political candidate of all time. (If you’re feeling an urge to e-mail me and dispute this, please remember: She lost. In the 2016 election, that alone took some doing.) Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/443528/liberal-media-real-america-fantasy-hurts-left Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 The country loves Obama! And hates Trump! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 And hates Trump! Are those the band of deplorables I heard so much about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts