OldTimer1960 Posted January 2, 2017 Posted January 2, 2017 I know it is early, but that pick is too late to get get a true difference maker. No QB that I can see, need defense and big WR, yet I don't see a dominant defender available there and a big WR is a waste without a better passer than Taylor next year.
Saint Doug Posted January 2, 2017 Posted January 2, 2017 Better 11th than 10th, contract wise. Hell, wouldn't it be better contract wise if we traded it for pick #32?
voodoo poonani Posted January 2, 2017 Posted January 2, 2017 I know it is early, but that pick is too late to get get a true difference maker. No QB that I can see, need defense and big WR, yet I don't see a dominant defender available there and a big WR is a waste without a better passer than Taylor next year. Not if you draft correctly
26CornerBlitz Posted January 2, 2017 Posted January 2, 2017 I know it is early, but that pick is too late to get get a true difference maker. No QB that I can see, need defense and big WR, yet I don't see a dominant defender available there and a big WR is a waste without a better passer than Taylor next year. #10 pick should yield an excellent player with the ability to start right away.
jumbalaya Posted January 2, 2017 Posted January 2, 2017 We can package our 2017 #1 & 2018 #1 and move up to 5 to draft a Clemson WR!
Awwufelloff Posted January 2, 2017 Posted January 2, 2017 We can package our 2017 #1 & 2018 #1 and move up to 5 to draft a Clemson WR!
26CornerBlitz Posted January 2, 2017 Posted January 2, 2017 We can package our 2017 #1 & 2018 #1 and move up to 5 to draft a Clemson WR! If you're going snarky at least realize it was up to #4.
flomoe Posted January 2, 2017 Posted January 2, 2017 We could use a kicker, wasn't Janikowski drafted early?
OldTimer1960 Posted January 2, 2017 Posted January 2, 2017 Not if you draft correctly So, who do you see that will be available that will help much?
PromoTheRobot Posted January 2, 2017 Posted January 2, 2017 (edited) Better 11th than 10th, contract wise.And 12th is cheaper than 11th, and so on. Edited January 2, 2017 by PromoTheRobot
OldTimer1960 Posted January 2, 2017 Posted January 2, 2017 #10 pick should yield an excellent player with the ability to start right away. Who do you see there? I don't think a WR, though certainly a need, helps this team if Taylor is playing QB. I like Tyrod, but he is not a good enough passer that a WR helps much.
26CornerBlitz Posted January 2, 2017 Posted January 2, 2017 Who do you see there? I don't think a WR, though certainly a need, helps this team if Taylor is playing QB. I like Tyrod, but he is not a good enough passer that a WR helps much. I could see Hooker, Adams, Mike Williams, or possibly a QB.
Kirby Jackson Posted January 2, 2017 Posted January 2, 2017 10 is kind of fun because they ALWAYS mock the top 10. You have a ton of coverage around top 10 picks. Pick 11 has so much less fanfare.
klos63 Posted January 2, 2017 Posted January 2, 2017 I know it is early, but that pick is too late to get get a true difference maker. No QB that I can see, need defense and big WR, yet I don't see a dominant defender available there and a big WR is a waste without a better passer than Taylor next year. maybe we should just pass on the first round.
/dev/null Posted January 2, 2017 Posted January 2, 2017 I could see Hooker, Adams, Mike Williams, or possibly a QB. The Bills have experience spending high draft picks on Clemson WRs and guys named Mike Williams, both were busts
Recommended Posts