Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Jay Glazer reporting the team could decide to part ways with him. Considering what he's done with the talent there, I would absolutely bring him in for an interview.

 

The only way it makes sense to fire him is if he was the main reason behind the Brock signing, but I don't feel like that can be right.

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

Jay Glazer reporting the team could decide to part ways with him. Considering what he's done with the talent there, I would absolutely bring him in for an interview.

 

The only way it makes sense to fire him is if he was the main reason behind the Brock signing, but I don't feel like that can be right.

He hasn't had much to work with at QB but has made the playoffs twice, granted in a very weak division, but still...Pete Caroll won the division at 7-9 once in Seattle...

 

The only thing I can think of is they feel he isn't getting enough out of Osweiler and they feel he is likely to bench him for the remainder of the time he is there after they invested so much money...

 

I'd bet it's about Osweiler..seems he has pulled the plug on him, but the team can't just walk away from the investment made and if he is refusing to try and develop him further, that creates an organizational push pull, especially since he gave his blessing to getting Osweiler in the first place...

 

They brought Osweiler in to be the QB, if he isn't with that anymore then it's probably best for both sides if he leaves.

Edited by matter2003
Posted (edited)

He hasn't had much to work with at QB but has made the playoffs twice, granted in a very weak division, but still...Pete Caroll won the division at 7-9 once in Seattle...

 

The only thing I can think of is they feel he isn't getting enough out of Osweiler and they feel he is likely to bench him for the remainder of the time he is there after they invested so much money...

 

I'd bet it's about Osweiler..seems he has pulled the plug on him, but the team can't just walk away from the investment made and if he is refusing to try and develop him further, that creates an organizational push pull, especially since he gave his blessing to getting Osweiler in the first place...

 

They brought Osweiler in to be the QB, if he isn't with that anymore then it's probably best for both sides if he leaves.

 

Very Shanahan-esqe with him wanting Cousins over 2nd overall RG3

Edited by Virgil
Posted

He has control over the 53 so I'd guess he had a lot to do with decisions on the QB position.

 

Never been a fan of his going back to his PSU days. But he's done a decent job.

Posted

 

Very Shanahan-esqe with him wanting Cousins over 2nd overall RG3

He doesn't have a Cousins on the roster, that's the problem...Savage isn't anywhere close to that level...

Posted

He doesn't have a Cousins on the roster, that's the problem...Savage isn't anywhere close to that level...

 

True. More about not wanting to play the guy that the GM paid a lot to get

Posted

He has control over the 53 so I'd guess he had a lot to do with decisions on the QB position.

 

Never been a fan of his going back to his PSU days. But he's done a decent job.

This is kind of how I feel. I actually like the talent (outside of QB) and they are just okay.
×
×
  • Create New...