Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Rooney Rule - plan and simple. I'm beginning to think Lynn will get the interview for HC but the Bills have someone in mind and possibly have him ready to ink a deal.

Could it be Coughlin? Maybe, maybe not.

I'm not really a DW fan anymore but I don't believe he's stupid enough to retool the team with a HC that has 1 game ever under his belt as a HC.

Posted

Rooney Rule - plan and simple. I'm beginning to think Lynn will get the interview for HC but the Bills have someone in mind and possibly have him ready to ink a deal.

Could it be Coughlin? Maybe, maybe not.

I'm not really a DW fan anymore but I don't believe he's stupid enough to retool the team with a HC that has 1 game ever under his belt as a HC.

But he is stupid enough to roll the dice on potentally wrecking this offense like the last coach did with the defense by bringing in a new coach that may want to make this offense its own.

Posted

The offense is scoring good without a franchise QB.

 

Keep Lynn and offense coaches especially Kromer has done well with OL

 

If Lynn is ok with a simple style 4-3 that's less stress then all new coaches coming in and starting over.

 

Just keep the contract at 3 years to see if he can do it.

Posted

Rooney Rule - plan and simple. I'm beginning to think Lynn will get the interview for HC but the Bills have someone in mind and possibly have him ready to ink a deal.

Could it be Coughlin? Maybe, maybe not.

I'm not really a DW fan anymore but I don't believe he's stupid enough to retool the team with a HC that has 1 game ever under his belt as a HC.

Maybe, or maybe not. Coughlin &'Whaley could butt heads before the ink dry's on the contract. I think he would want a bit of control. That's why Lynn if offered would take the gig. Bite the bullet and follow Whaley's lead. Just to get his foot in the NFL HC ranks.

In other words being a yes man for the sake of HC experience.

Posted

Rooney Rule - plan and simple. I'm beginning to think Lynn will get the interview for HC but the Bills have someone in mind and possibly have him ready to ink a deal.

Could it be Coughlin? Maybe, maybe not.

I'm not really a DW fan anymore but I don't believe he's stupid enough to retool the team with a HC that has 1 game ever under his belt as a HC.

 

It's one thing if you don't think Whaley will hire Lynn because of his lack of experience or whatever. But to write him off as a token "Rooney Rule" candidate is disrespectful and pretty offensive, frankly.

Posted

I would never take McDaniels. It's easy to be a successful offensive coordinator when you have a hall of fame quarterback. I would would love them to get Matt Patricia. He is one smart dude and has been working under Belacheet for some time now and understands what it takes to win football games.

Posted (edited)

I would never take McDaniels. It's easy to be a successful offensive coordinator when you have a hall of fame quarterback. I would would love them to get Matt Patricia. He is one smart dude and has been working under Belacheet for some time now and understands what it takes to win football games.

 

How can you say that about McDaniels but think Patricia "understands what it takes to win football games"?

 

Even if we pretend that Patricia not Belichick is the brains behind their defense - Patricia doesn't even need to have a good defense because the Pats' O is so good year after year.

 

Both are likely just riding on Bradichick's coat tails.

Edited by Wayne Arnold
Posted

I like Lynn if they can't get McDaniels or Patricia

 

No on McDaniels. He blew up the offense in Denver and set them back a couple years, he didn't do St Louis Rams any favors as their OC. Just cuz a guy looks great in NE coaching Tom Brady doesn't mean he can coach.

Posted (edited)

 

How can you say that about McDaniels but think Patricia "understands what it takes to win football games"?

 

Even if we pretend that Patricia not Belichick is the brains behind their defense - Patricia doesn't even need to have a good defense because the Pats' O is so good year after year.

 

Both are likely just riding on Bradichick's coat tails.

 

Except that since Patricia became DC in 2012, the Pats have had a very good D. Rex claimed it, but except for 2011, the Pats have actually had a top-10 D on points since 2006

Patricia is an interesting guy. First off, Belichick is a little different from some HCs with expertise on one side of the ball. He delegates. So his OC and DC are real. Several Pats and former Pats players have commented on how they would hardly see Belichick during the week. That said, he clearly oversees every aspect of the Pats.

 

Second, Patricia actually started on O! He was an OLman in college, and started with the Pats as an offensive assistant in 2004. He switched to LB coach in 2006 and became defensive playcaller in 2009 and DC in 2012. So he's a real product of the Patriots system, but he knows both sides of the ball. He clearly wants to be a HC since he interviewed for the Browns job last year.

 

The tight, long-time association of Patricia with the Pats is both a positive and a question mark. He ought to understand every aspect of how their organization works. That's good. The downside is, how much of that organization can he implement on his own? It's easy to think you know everything about how a system works, but when you're trying to replicate a system on your own, sometimes you learn you don't know as much about the critical underpinnings as you think you do. The other possible "gotcha" is when a guy has only worked in one system, sometimes he only knows one way to get things done and can't easily distinguish between things that are essential to success and things that actually could be done several other ways. How flexible is he?

Edited by Hapless Bills Fan
Posted

If Lynn had accomplished what he accomplished here with another team, fans would be viewing him as top candidate for the HC job.

 

He has 17 years of experience on an NFL sideline, coaching for guys like Shanahan, Parcells, Del Rio and Rex Ryan. He was a former player, so he can relate to his players and for what we saw this year, they responded to his coaching. He took something that wasn't his (Roman's offense) and made it work, he simplified it and adapted on the fly.

 

Just because he was with us for two years doesn't mean he is the wrong choice for the job.

Posted

Anthony Lynn: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Lynn

 

As player: As coach:

 


Anthony Lynn has worked under 5 Head Coaches:

Posted

I would never take McDaniels. It's easy to be a successful offensive coordinator when you have a hall of fame quarterback. I would would love them to get Matt Patricia. He is one smart dude and has been working under Belacheet for some time now and understands what it takes to win football games.

I agree with you No interest in McDaniels, Patricia is where I would go. He has experience on both sides of the ball and defense has been consistently good. He is being properly groomed to be a HC make him ours before its another 18 yrs of Patriots leading the division

Posted

 

Except that since Patricia became DC in 2012, the Pats have had a very good D. Rex claimed it, but except for 2011, the Pats have actually had a top-10 D on points since 2006

Patricia is an interesting guy. First off, Belichick is a little different from some HCs with expertise on one side of the ball. He delegates. So his OC and DC are real. Several Pats and former Pats players have commented on how they would hardly see Belichick during the week. That said, he clearly oversees every aspect of the Pats.

 

Second, Patricia actually started on O! He was an OLman in college, and started with the Pats as an offensive assistant in 2004. He switched to LB coach in 2006 and became defensive playcaller in 2009 and DC in 2012. So he's a real product of the Patriots system, but he knows both sides of the ball. He clearly wants to be a HC since he interviewed for the Browns job last year.

 

The tight, long-time association of Patricia with the Pats is both a positive and a question mark. He ought to understand every aspect of how their organization works. That's good. The downside is, how much of that organization can he implement on his own? It's easy to think you know everything about how a system works, but when you're trying to replicate a system on your own, sometimes you learn you don't know as much about the critical underpinnings as you think you do. The other possible "gotcha" is when a guy has only worked in one system, sometimes he only knows one way to get things done and can't easily distinguish between things that are essential to success and things that actually could be done several other ways. How flexible is he?

 

Pats defenses before Patricia:

 

2007 - #2 score percentage / #11 DVOA

2008 - #9 score percentage / #17 DVOA

2009 - #3 score percentage / #14 DVOA

2010 - #12 score percentage / #21 DVOA

2011 - #16 score percentage / #30 DVOA

 

Under Patricia:

 

2012 - #8 score percentage / #15 DVOA

2013 - #7 score percentage / #20 DVOA

2014 - #13 score percentage / #12 DVOA

2015 - #6 score percentage / #12 DVOA

2016 - #1 score percentage / #16 DVOA

 

I don't have much to add to this except I find it incredible how good the Patriots are at keeping the opposition out of the end zone. Year after year. Only once (2014) in the last ten years have the Pats' defense not overachieved with regard to score prevention. Both before and after Patricia. It's really amazing. And proof that while they won't be as consistently dominant after Brady retires, as long as Belichick is there they'll still contend for the playoffs every year.

Posted

But he is stupid enough to roll the dice on potentally wrecking this offense like the last coach did with the defense by bringing in a new coach that may want to make this offense its own.

 

How, exactly, would one ruin an offense that was the best in the league at running the ball and 2nd to last in passing the ball?

Posted

We'd be really dumb to 'blow things up' imo. Offense is clicking with a middle of the road QB.... the defense has some talented players, just need a better scheme for us.

Posted (edited)

Anthony Lynn: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Lynn

 

 

As player:

 

 

As coach:

 

Anthony Lynn has worked under 5 Head Coaches:

That's a solid resume for sure. So solid, that he is sure to have other teams interested in him. Given the general state of the Bills organization, Lynn may very well choose to go elsewhere. Even if the Bills want him as their HC, Lynn might want nothing more to do with the Bills.

Edited by Jkgobills
Posted

It's one thing if you don't think Whaley will hire Lynn because of his lack of experience or whatever. But to write him off as a token "Rooney Rule" candidate is disrespectful and pretty offensive, frankly.

He can the Rooney Rule apply to a team when a black man is hiring the head coach?

Posted (edited)

More interested to see how Dennis Thurman calls the defense. If he can eliminate the stupid errors and dumb penalties will be a step in the right direction. Want to see how hard the defense plays with Thurman now in charge.

Edited by billieve420
×
×
  • Create New...