EasternOHBillsFan Posted December 30, 2016 Posted December 30, 2016 Gilmore and ZB come to mind as two guys who were obviously "sacrificing their pride and legacy," on multiple occasions. VERY true. Gilmore showed up for maybe 2 games this season at best... it was supremely embarrassing.
Kelly the Dog Posted December 30, 2016 Posted December 30, 2016 Ok BUT, if you're the GM working with Rex to put together the right roster for the kind of team he's building, shouldn't it ultimately be your responsibility either to (i) force him to adapt his system to the available personnel (to the extent that is possible, which under the Pegulas' "dotted horizontal line" structure it might not have been), and/or (ii) at the very least, if the safety position is critical to the system your coach runs, come into the season with enough depth at that position so that your entire season doesn't hinge on the health of a guy who is one hit away from a wheelchair? What the HELL was Whaley doing all offseason? Does he even talk to his coaches? There were a number of quality safeties available to sign or trade for. I accept your premise, but to me, it puts equal (if not more) blame on Whaley. I imagine both of them were fairly happy with Blanton as a backup who had several years starting experience. Bringing Ed Reed in likely made them think he could coach a guy like Duke up. The Bills put six safeties on IR. Six. That's crazy.
The Big Cat Posted December 30, 2016 Posted December 30, 2016 Gilmore and ZB come to mind as two guys who were obviously "sacrificing their pride and legacy," on multiple occasions. For the purposes of protesting scheme, no. In self preservation mode in a contract year, yes.
FireChan Posted December 30, 2016 Posted December 30, 2016 For the purposes of protesting scheme, no. In self preservation mode in a contract year, yes. If you recall my original post, I said nothing about "protesting scheme." I said buy-in. Self-preservation mode, not buying-in come from the same root. Their hearts weren't in it. I don't think it was a planned protest, but if some guy is telling you to do X and he sucks, and X has proven to suck, and the last 20 times you tried X it sucked, the average guy's heart isn't gonna be in it anymore. That's just human nature.
John from Riverside Posted December 30, 2016 Posted December 30, 2016 If you recall my original post, I said nothing about "protesting scheme." I said buy-in. Self-preservation mode, not buying-in come from the same root. Their hearts weren't in it. I don't think it was a planned protest, but if some guy is telling you to do X and he sucks, and X has proven to suck, and the last 20 times you tried X it sucked, the average guy's heart isn't gonna be in it anymore. That's just human nature. I think a big part of the problem is we went from a Elite defenses to having to "buy into" something else....... It didnt work...the players dont want to think on the field they want it simple so they can react. Also....it seems they simply do that have that player that makes the communication flow....my guess is that player had to be Aaron Williams..... Fix it.....
vincec Posted December 30, 2016 Posted December 30, 2016 (edited) https://www.sportingnews.com/amp/nfl/news/marcell-dareus-buffalo-bills-bart-scott-cbs-radio/1djmsawuasgu91g1p22m81nqjx Lol. My take as well. Edited December 30, 2016 by vincec
chris heff Posted December 30, 2016 Posted December 30, 2016 Dang kids and their fancy-pants urban lingo! Back in my day we used phrases that meant something like hubba-hubba and 23-skidoo! Do you know the derivation of "23-sldoo? It comes from when the Flatiron was built on 23rd st. The shape of the building caused the wind to blow women's skirts up, hence the term 23-skido.
zonabb Posted December 30, 2016 Posted December 30, 2016 Typical chicken-bleep comments so commonplace in today's society esp. sports media.
nedboy7 Posted December 30, 2016 Posted December 30, 2016 Come on guys. It was TT's fault. As you will see next year when we start some dumb rookie and we win the superbowl!!!!
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted December 30, 2016 Posted December 30, 2016 Come on guys. It was TT's fault. As you will see next year when we start some dumb rookie and we win the superbowl!!!! LOL! LMAO
Nitro Posted December 31, 2016 Posted December 31, 2016 I am guessing it came from the defensive side of the ball. The Offense did well under Ryan. The malcontents probably were the veteran hold overs. Letting Mario go was a smart move. Hughes will be next. Gilmore, if not franchised, will be looking to move on. The purge will be starting soon.
Buffalo Barbarian Posted December 31, 2016 Posted December 31, 2016 does rex not know how to coach a 4-3 defense? I mean why couldn't pegula go to him before the season and say...go back to the 4-3 wide 9 and get the defense back. i mean we all knew our guys weren't right for it so why would he bet his career on trying to fit the round peg into the square hole? he gets paid 5 mil per to know all kinds of defenses right? No way is an owner going to tell a coach to change his entire defense. Pegs did the right thing in getting rid of the guy with the difficult scheme.
jahbonas Posted December 31, 2016 Posted December 31, 2016 I'm going to agree with Peter. The crash and burn of Rex was completely predictable and therefore avoidable. But, having said that, it should be obvious that the talent on defense it vastly over rated by many own this board. No coaching will prevent blown coverages or crappy run stopping an tackling. These guys aren;t nearly as good as advertised...here at least. The biggest problem with Rex's Defense was a surprisingly lack of pressure and confusion on the opposing QB. You indicate its the lack of talent - it can be strongly argued that using Darius as an expensive Nose Guard rather than an attacking 330lb DT hurts our pass rush attempts. Also - much of Rex;s pass rush scheme was designed around delayed blitzes by def backs and linebackers - in todays league the QB gets rid of the ball so quickly the pressure has to come from the front 4. Rexs scheme is no longer working in todays league - thats the biggest reason to be adios.
Fixxxer Posted December 31, 2016 Posted December 31, 2016 C'mon, don't like the scheme so you let guys run right over you? when the communication fails, you hesitate, when you hesitate, you start thinking, and when you start thinking the other team already snaped the ball, you overreact and overpursue. You don't trust your teammate got the play right and you overcompensate for him, taking you out of your assigned position. You can aid this with a more simpler system, in Schwartz's system, the rookie Preston Brown called the plays, the system worked for everyone. We should look into going to a similar system next year (for the sake of defensive players) Gilmore, though, as Eball said, lacks fundamentals of how to tackle properly. in the off-season I posted a video of how the Seahawks hired some rugby coaches to teach them how to tackle. I hope our next HC guy can implement something similiar.
Wayne Arnold Posted December 31, 2016 Author Posted December 31, 2016 Come on guys. It was TT's fault. As you will see next year when we start some dumb rookie and we win the superbowl!!!! Just as long as it's a #tallwhitequarterback. A way bitter fit fer Baw-floh! Dat street fuhball doh werk in dis league.
Mr. WEO Posted December 31, 2016 Posted December 31, 2016 For the purposes of protesting scheme, no. In self preservation mode in a contract year, yes. Since when do players dog it (or "self preserve" if you prefer) in a contract year?
Peter Posted December 31, 2016 Posted December 31, 2016 Just as long as it's a #tallwhitequarterback. A way bitter fit fer Baw-floh! Dat street fuhball doh werk in dis league. I respect the hell out of Tyrod. He has given us all he has. I am not sure that there is going to be any QB available that is better than he is. The problem (or one problem) is his contract. Can one justify the cap hit? I think the Texans are finding out that they made a mistake.
Recommended Posts