scribo Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 What short memories some here have. Let me refresh memories: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000564572/article/manuels-worst-four-minutes-sinks-bills
bobobonators Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 I respectfully disagree, as I see the BILLS picking up the option on Taylor with the same sentiment you expressed....to me, Tyrod is NOT a good NFL QB but an incredible athlete with immeasurable physical gifts....however, I think the Bills will sign a relatively younger vet (see Glennon, Mike) and draft one somewhere in the first 2 rounds for the second or third year. Glennon is the exact same age as TT: 27. People think Tyrod is like 32 yrs old apparently. Only a handful of teams in the NFL have scored more TD's than the Bills since 2015. Scoring can't be ignored. Tyrod has 23 TD's this season between passing/rushing, putting him in the top HALF in the NFL in scoring for QB's (all while having the least turnovers for any NFL QB).
BobChalmers Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 Any chance at all Jones is ready next year kinda like Prescott for Cowboys? Was Prescott rated that much higher than Jones coming out of college? YES - Prescott was a MUCH better QB in college. Cardale was the 3rd stringer at OSU but played due to injury. Dak was a dominant force in his Junior(? second to last) year at Mississippi State.
papazoid Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 unless your plan is to get the #1 overall pick in 2018.....EJ as our franchise qb is a terrible idea
nucci Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 YES - Prescott was a MUCH better QB in college. Cardale was the 3rd stringer at OSU but played due to injury. Dak was a dominant force in his Junior(? second to last) year at Mississippi State. Cool, thanks...I watch college football but don't know it that well.
BobChalmers Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 (edited) What short memories some here have. Let me refresh memories: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000564572/article/manuels-worst-four-minutes-sinks-bills And yet, EJ still led a comeback and left the field with a lead that the defense and ref's took from him. The London game was and still is WAY overblown in evaluating Manuel. Edited December 28, 2016 by BobChalmers
bobobonators Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 I dont want the option picked up. But as long as the Bills are not forcing it one way or another on the new coach and said new coach makes the call i am ok with it i guess This I can live with, b/c I agree that regardless of what TT has done here, if the new coach doesn't want TT then so be it. Let the new coach decide. However, playing devil's advocate: if Whaley doesn't want TT, do you think he'll hire a HC that agrees with his views of TT (assuming Whaley isn't sold on TT)? Or will Whaley hire the best HC candidate regardless of the candidate's views on TT. I would assume Whaley would try to hire someone who shares his views/direction for the team.
jms62 Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 (edited) I dont want the option picked up. But as long as the Bills are not forcing it one way or another on the new coach and said new coach makes the call i am ok with it i guess This is fair enough.. Let the new coach decide Edited December 28, 2016 by jms62
nucci Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 What short memories some here have. Let me refresh memories: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000564572/article/manuels-worst-four-minutes-sinks-bills I'm not advocating for EJ to be our QB but I can do the same thing..
bobobonators Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 In other words, if Lynn says "hey Whaley I want TT back next season, pick up the option" Does Whaley think, well I don't like TT, let me look at the next candidate in line to see what they want to do...That has to play a factor here. I honestly don't know what Whaley objectively thinks of TT.
scribo Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 And yet, EJ still led a comeback and left the field with a lead that the defense and ref's took from him. The London game was and still is WAY overblown in evaluating Manuel. He was only in position to attempt a comeback because the Bills defense kept them in and how bad the Jags were. The problem was the end, it was how terrible he is when he is off. His inconsistency is why he'll never be a regular starter again. There is nothing out there to indicate otherwise. I'm not advocating for EJ to be our QB but I can do the same thing.. Fair enough. But I'll point out that your evidence is three years old. Mine is one.
nucci Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 He was only in position to attempt a comeback because the Bills defense kept them in and how bad the Jags were. The problem was the end, it was how terrible he is when he is off. His inconsistency is why he'll never be a regular starter again. There is nothing out there to indicate otherwise. Fair enough. But I'll point out that your evidence is three years old. Mine is one. Yep, I get it
BobChalmers Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 I didn't love EJ's play at FSU (I'm an alumnus and fan) and thought he was a good developmental prospect - not a 1st rounder. He was clearly the best available QB that year though - anyone with a brain knew Geno was a trash system QB whose stats were all padded with 5-yard dumps that went for big YAC. We do know from both of the last 2 seasons is that he's been the best QB on the roster in preseason play. That's not worth a lot, but it's something, and it's certainly worth finding out if he has, in fact, developed some since we last saw him. If you don't think TT is the long term answer, then keeping EJ around until we find that guy makes a lot of sense.
bobobonators Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 We rank #3 in the NFL in touchdowns per game right now. Not much room for improvement unless people here think that bringing a rookie QB is going to take this offense to NFL record-setting levels. So imagine how awesome this team is going to look when we don't score more TD's next season but have 15 more INT's from the QB position.
MAJBobby Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 This I can live with, b/c I agree that regardless of what TT has done here, if the new coach doesn't want TT then so be it. Let the new coach decide. However, playing devil's advocate: if Whaley doesn't want TT, do you think he'll hire a HC that agrees with his views of TT (assuming Whaley isn't sold on TT)? Or will Whaley hire the best HC candidate regardless of the candidate's views on TT. I would assume Whaley would try to hire someone who shares his views/direction for the team. I would think he is hirinf the best HC no matter his views on TT. Why? Because for first time in 4 years he will be married to the coach and his future will likely depend on the success of that coach.
bobobonators Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 I'd love to see this defense make stops on a short field b/c of turnovers 2x a game.
jms62 Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 I didn't love EJ's play at FSU (I'm an alumnus and fan) and thought he was a good developmental prospect - not a 1st rounder. He was clearly the best available QB that year though - anyone with a brain knew Geno was a trash system QB whose stats were all padded with 5-yard dumps that went for big YAC. We do know from both of the last 2 seasons is that he's been the best QB on the roster in preseason play. That's not worth a lot, but it's something, and it's certainly worth finding out if he has, in fact, developed some since we last saw him. If you don't think TT is the long term answer, then keeping EJ around until we find that guy makes a lot of sense. Refresh my memory didn't his college coach say that he wouldn't be much of an NFL player before we decided we knew more than the man watching him everyday at practice and drafted him.
bobobonators Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 I would think he is hirinf the best HC no matter his views on TT. Why? Because for first time in 4 years he will be married to the coach and his future will likely depend on the success of that coach. I would lean towards agreeing with this. However, I could also see a scenario where Whaley has his own vision of what this team should be, and he'll make his hiring based on the best fit to his views. Only natural (in my opinion).
Herb62 Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 How quickly we forget...last year Cinncy at home he laid an egg, Jacksonville in England he had 4 picks. Fine hard working young man competent 3rd stringer.
Recommended Posts