Southern Bills Fan Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 How did anyone know that it would be you to start this thread?
Dorkington Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 Only makes sense to you CoT guys and goes against everything you guys have been preaching and justifying as to why to keep TT. A little butt hurt I can see TT is bad and everyone knows it except Rex and the CoT. Arguably, Tyrod is pretty average. Good at some things, bad at other things, overall pretty average. There's a good chunk of starting QBs I'd take Tyrod over. There's a good chuck of QBs I'd take over Tyrod.
goldenboy81 Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 (edited) Ej da great!!!! Glad,get to see him play 1 more time Edited December 27, 2016 by goldenboy81
fridge Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 Personally, I think something like ANY/A from Profootball reference is a better indicator of production. Just measuring total yards doesn't really tell you everything, since two equally talented QBs could be ranked different depending on play calling. ANY/A rankings have Tyrod at 9th and 19th, averaging out to just about average. Which, the eye test tells me lines up. This year is down, imo, partially due to missing WRs for multiple games, especially deep threats. Do I think Tyrod is a guy who can carry a bad defense? No. Do I think he is a guy that can win with an average to good defense? Yes. We have talent on the defensive side (at least I think so). If our new DC can convince the FO that the defense will improve, I could see Tyrod coming back. This is probably the correct take. Tyrod can appear, especially on paper, to be a very average QB. He is a super athlete which can help him trend upwards in many situations, but he's been virtually incapable of rising when the going gets tough. I think overall he is a very flawed QB that could be hidden well on a great team. He does enough and is safe to the point where you can never outright blame him for losses. He just never does enough to take credit for the wins either. I think the Broncos would have made the playoffs with Tyrod, but I also think the Browns would still only have one win with him.
DaBills51 Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 EJ starts Sunday. Doesnt scream well for Tyrod option kdiggz started a topic on this almost 20 minutes before you but you had to start a new one since you have an unhealthy obsession with TT. Please tell me what this adds compared to what kdiggz had in his thread? I hope you find the help you need in this upcoming new year.
Dorkington Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 This is probably the correct take. Tyrod can appear, especially on paper, to be a very average QB. He is a super athlete which can help him trend upwards in many situations, but he's been virtually incapable of rising when the going gets tough. I think overall he is a very flawed QB that could be hidden well on a great team. He does enough and is safe to the point where you can never outright blame him for losses. He just never does enough to take credit for the wins either. I think the Broncos would have made the playoffs with Tyrod, but I also think the Browns would still only have one win with him. Yeah, it really comes down to being reasonable about our options. A good QB isn't exactly common, there's what 10? in the league, maybe? So if one isn't clearly available, and you have the cap space, then why not keep Tyrod... unless you are expecting the defense to stay horrible, or are planning to completely tank.
MAJBobby Posted December 27, 2016 Author Posted December 27, 2016 (edited) They are 7th in points and 12th in yards, but presumably you know that and just choose not to include the stats. EJ led Bills in this designed offense also avgs 26 ppg kdiggz started a topic on this almost 20 minutes before you but you had to start a new one since you have an unhealthy obsession with TT. Please tell me what this adds compared to what kdiggz had in his thread? I hope you find the help you need in this upcoming new year. And if they move on and the next QB is bad dont worry i will call him out routinely too Edited December 27, 2016 by MAJBobby
Big Gun Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 Arguably, Tyrod is pretty average. Good at some things, bad at other things, overall pretty average. There's a good chunk of starting QBs I'd take Tyrod over. There's a good chuck of QBs I'd take over Tyrod. Not me, as it seems you need to have the #1 rush attack for him to be average at best. How bad would he fail if he was asked to try and have an average pass attack and not settle for second last? Or if the record setting rush attack over the last 25 years wasn't his friend and covered a lot of his faults? I don't think he gets any interest for a starting QB job, backup, sure not starter.
fridge Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 EJ led Bills in this designed offense also avgs 26 ppg Shhhhh...the excuse flood gate is wide open. Don't you understand? EJ is terrible (was 2-2 when pulled), and Tyrod is fantastic but had no help (was 7-8 when "pulled").
dave mcbride Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 EJ led Bills in this designed offense also avgs 26 ppg And if they move on and the next QB is bad dont worry i will call him out routinely too Um, no. The Bills had a defensive TD against the Jags. Please factor that in before making more stuff up.
MAJBobby Posted December 27, 2016 Author Posted December 27, 2016 (edited) Um, no. The Bills had a defensive TD against the Jags. Please factor that in before making more stuff up.ANd your factoring out the defensive scores here too? For Tyrods scoring offense? Cause if you are it is Not 26 ppg like people want to claim So do that before making more stuff up Edited December 27, 2016 by MAJBobby
section122 Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 I don't mind this as I agree with the flexibility angle. I would however prefer Cardale to get this start. I understand he is being "redshirted" but EJ is gone after this game. Starting him doesn't do anything developmentally for this team. I don't think it matters who the Bills trot out to start I think they beat the Jets as that team has entirely folded so I don't think the tank this game idea holds any water. Shhhhh...the excuse flood gate is wide open. Don't you understand? EJ is terrible (was 2-2 when pulled), and Tyrod is fantastic but had no help (was 7-8 when "pulled"). I might be the last person on the EJ bandwagon. I think he got screwed here. I still can't believe that his Bills career basically ended in that Texans game when the refs missed a clear PI and the ball was intercepted. He had no QB coach his first year and then got the great David Lee ( ) along with Hackett to help him. I wonder if he can get it together on a team with a real coaching staff...
dave mcbride Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 ANd your factoring out the defensive scores here too? For Tyrods scoring offense? Cause if you are it is Not 26 ppg like people want to claim So do that before making more stuff up The Bills have had two-count-em-two defensive scores this season. I think that could be a league low. Look at Bobonators post for the actual facts.
fridge Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 I might be the last person on the EJ bandwagon. I think he got screwed here. I still can't believe that his Bills career basically ended in that Texans game when the refs missed a clear PI and the ball was intercepted. He had no QB coach his first year and then got the great David Lee ( ) along with Hackett to help him. I wonder if he can get it together on a team with a real coaching staff... EJ was definitely screwed here.
DaBills51 Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 Um, no. The Bills had a defensive TD against the Jags. Please factor that in before making more stuff up. Argued this with him in another thread. According to the major - it doesn't matter that EJ averaged 2 turnover each game or that we were getting blown out in each game heading into the fourth or that it's a sample size of 2 games. Never argue with a fool. They will bring you down to their level and beat you with experience. EJ led Bills in this designed offense also avgs 26 ppg And if they move on and the next QB is bad dont worry i will call him out routinely too As per usual you don't answer the question at hand. You should get into politics.
dave mcbride Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 Argued this with him in another thread. According to the major - it doesn't matter that EJ averaged 2 turnover each game or that we were getting blown out in each game heading into the fourth or that it's a sample size of 2 games. Never argue with a fool. They will bring you down to their level and beat you with experience. Duly noted. I'm out!
Big Gun Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 Um, no. The Bills had a defensive TD against the Jags. Please factor that in before making more stuff up. And the bills had 3 defensive TDs this year.
Dorkington Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 I'm of the opinion that EJ would be a viable starting QB if he was developed properly. Hell, he still might turn out to be that way somewhere. Great? Probably not. Alex Smith like? Sure. I actually liked what I saw from EJ under Roman/Lynn (yes, even the Jax game, with the 5 minutes of terror). Do I keep him over Tyrod though? Probably not. Tyrod is safer, at least with this offense. We'd be in the playoffs with this offense, and a marginally better defense.
dave mcbride Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 And the bills had 3 defensive TDs this year. No, 2. http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/buf/2016.htm
MAJBobby Posted December 27, 2016 Author Posted December 27, 2016 The Bills have had two-count-em-two defensive scores this season. I think that could be a league low. Look at Bobonators post for the actual facts. Umm they actually have 3 Ok cool so 389-18= 371 371/15= 24 ppg EJ led Bills 52-6 = 46 46/2 = 23 ppg Huge drop off let me tell tou Argued this with him in another thread. According to the major - it doesn't matter that EJ averaged 2 turnover each game or that we were getting blown out in each game heading into the fourth or that it's a sample size of 2 games. Never argue with a fool. They will bring you down to their level and beat you with experience. As per usual you don't answer the question at hand. You should get into politics. But wait its about scoring thats what people tell me score
Recommended Posts