dave mcbride Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 How many times did we see this offense fail to move the ball. Taylor showed flashes. But he was also downright awful for extended stretches. Too much unknown to pick up essentially a 3 year option for a guy who might not get better and cant delivery in crunch time. A lot of teams not named the Patriots fail to move the ball on occasion. Look at Bobonators post for the facts.
Coach Tuesday Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 (edited) They probably want to preserve Tyrod's health and contract as an option/decision for the next coach - which IMO would not be unreasonable. Will help attract candidates for the job (i.e., if Tyrod got hurt, coach candidates might be nervous about taking the job). Edited December 27, 2016 by Coach Tuesday
CountDorkula Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 A lot of teams not named the Patriots fail to move the ball on occasion. Look at Bobonators post for the facts. Keyword. This team failed to do it a lot. When the offense needed to step up, it floundered and sank. When the defense needed a rest the offense went 3 and out over and over and over again. Taylor leads that offense, most of the blame falls on him. This team had the best rushing attack in the NFL, there is no excuse for a passing attack that was terribly bad other than the QB just wasn't good enough..
dave mcbride Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 Keyword. This team failed to do it a lot. When the offense needed to step up, it floundered and sank. When the defense needed a rest the offense went 3 and out over and over and over again. Taylor leads that offense, most of the blame falls on him. This team had the best rushing attack in the NFL, there is no excuse for a passing attack that was terribly bad other than the QB just wasn't good enough.. Again, look at Bobonators' post for the facts.
bobobonators Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 They probably want to preserve Tyrod's health and contract as an option/decision for the next coach - which IMO would not be unreasonable. 100% agree. This is actually one of the smartest things the Bills have done all season. There is absolutely NOTHING the Jets game will "prove" with respect to Tyrod. The jets are Rich Kotite bad. They are absolutely brutal. There is nothing to gain from this game, and much to lose. If the new HC doesn't like TT than why risk him getting injured. If the new HC wants TT, we have plenty of time to pick up the option. Win/Win.
Big C Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 EJ is going to light up the Jets. But I will only be truly impressed if he scores more than 41.
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 wow--what a way to usher in the new year! This game is going to unwatchable.
YoloinOhio Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 I don't think EJ will ever be a good starting QB. But I don't get how many people harp on his pick 6s as the reason, like other starting QBs (good ones) don't throw them every week.
CountDorkula Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 Again, look at Bobonators' post for the facts. I saw that post. The Bills set a franchise record with Rushing TD's from McCoy and TD mike this year. The Bills had the top rushing offense in the NFL by a wide margin. Find me a game where Taylor lead a 4Q comeback. You cant. Taylors wins (The Bills wins) came against teams with piss poor records. All of those fancy stats dont mean anything if you cant win games against teams with winning records. Say what you will about the Bills d. they were atrocious. Taylor had multiple opportunities to win the game late in the 4Q and just couldn't get it done.
Big C Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 I don't think EJ will ever be a good starting QB. But I don't get how many people harp on his pick 6s as the reason, like other starting QBs (good ones) don't throw them every week. Agreed
goldenboy81 Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 Ryan bros gone amd ej starting... Not a bad ending to a crap movie
DriveFor1Outta5 Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 I can't believe those who think this is an effort to "tank". Isn't McCoy our offense anyway? This is Whaley wanting to be right about EJ. Now that Rex is gone he can start EJ. Shouldn't Lynn be making this decision? What a joke of an organization.
CountDorkula Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 I can't believe those who think this is an effort to "tank". Isn't McCoy our offense anyway? This is Whaley wanting to be right about EJ. Now that Rex is gone he can start EJ. Shouldn't Lynn be making this decision? What a joke of an organization. No, it's not. It is about giving yourself a real decision timeline in regards to Taylor and not being forced to keep him because of injury.
26CornerBlitz Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 Your Sunday QB duel is EJ vs........ @nyjets Bowles: Ryan Fitzpatrick will start at QB. Christian Hackenberg will be the No. 2.
DriveFor1Outta5 Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 (edited) They probably want to preserve Tyrod's health and contract as an option/decision for the next coach - which IMO would not be unreasonable. Will help attract candidates for the job (i.e., if Tyrod got hurt, coach candidates might be nervous about taking the job). I'd think it shows the next coaching staff that the front office doesn't think TT is the guy. You're not going to see any other starting QB's benched on teams that are out of the playoff race for the final week. Unless they aren't the solidified starter. Edited December 27, 2016 by DriveFor1Outta5
dave mcbride Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 I saw that post. The Bills set a franchise record with Rushing TD's from McCoy and TD mike this year. The Bills had the top rushing offense in the NFL by a wide margin. Find me a game where Taylor lead a 4Q comeback. You cant. Taylors wins (The Bills wins) came against teams with piss poor records. All of those fancy stats dont mean anything if you cant win games against teams with winning records. Say what you will about the Bills d. they were atrocious. Taylor had multiple opportunities to win the game late in the 4Q and just couldn't get it done. So we don't count the Miami game, where he did in fact lead a 4 Q comeback with a minute to go and led the team for makeable FG in OT only to see it missed? And please don't say he didn't get the "win" -- arguing that way makes one look like a sophist, pure and simple. I do agree that he hasn't done it enough.
4merper4mer Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 ... which is effing stupid. But par for the course for this team and this GM. There is a huge difference between allowing yourself to make an offseason decision on a player and putting yourself in a position to be forced into a 10+M cap hit on an injured player. This is a pragmatic decision even if it is a bit hard to swallow for TT. I could understand him being upset and the Bills owe him an explanation, but there are certainly viable explanations to be given. First and foremost there will be a new coach soon. That coach could be someone who is in love with TT and demand we keep him or someone who loathes him and makes cutting him a condition of the job, or anywhere in between. If TT were to go out and get hurt, it would limit the team. That is just a fact. It is not TT's fault, but it is a fact. Personally I like TT a lot although I see his shortcomings. I have mixed feelings on whether I think he can overcome them. I'd like to see him back but will also understand if he is not. If we were forced to bring him back and he somehow got hurt, that would limit us in too many other places. This weekend's game is a preseason game. The Bills owe TT a solid explanation about the situation and I hope they give him one. I don't think they owe him the start.
dave mcbride Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 There is a huge difference between allowing yourself to make an offseason decision on a player and putting yourself in a position to be forced into a 10+M cap hit on an injured player. This is a pragmatic decision even if it is a bit hard to swallow for TT. I could understand him being upset and the Bills owe him an explanation, but there are certainly viable explanations to be given. First and foremost there will be a new coach soon. That coach could be someone who is in love with TT and demand we keep him or someone who loathes him and makes cutting him a condition of the job, or anywhere in between. If TT were to go out and get hurt, it would limit the team. That is just a fact. It is not TT's fault, but it is a fact. Personally I like TT a lot although I see his shortcomings. I have mixed feelings on whether I think he can overcome them. I'd like to see him back but will also understand if he is not. If we were forced to bring him back and he somehow got hurt, that would limit us in too many other places. This weekend's game is a preseason game. The Bills owe TT a solid explanation about the situation and I hope they give him one. I don't think they owe him the start. This is a well reasoned post buy my gut feeling is that since Whaley is going to control the shots, we're not going to end up with a coach that wants Tyrod Taylor. I could be wrong, but honestly, I don't have a ton of faith in our GM.
DriveFor1Outta5 Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 This is a well reasoned post buy my gut feeling is that since Whaley is going to control the shots, we're not going to end up with a coach that wants Tyrod Taylor. I could be wrong, but honestly, I don't have a ton of faith in our GM. I agree. Everyone should know that TT was a Rex guy. Whaley still has an EJ fetish due to his own ego. It's not that complicated. If Whaley thinks he's going into next year with a new coach and EJ at the controls, he will be gone very soon.
dezertbill Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 (edited) I don't look at this as Whaley completely throwing in the towel on Tyrod. I believe they still have interest in keeping Tyrod, just not at the huge number they would be stuck with if he gets hurt. Sitting him gives Whaley options to bring back Tyrod at a friendlier price without forcing his hand. It's smart. As for the EJ talk. If Whaley uses this one game to justify signing EJ to a future deal then Whaley is just blind and he should be shown the door as well. With that being said I believe EJs start is more about Cardale not being ready than EJ being looked at as a future option. The ship has sailed on Manuel. I can't see how the Bills could look it any different. Edited December 27, 2016 by dezertbill
Recommended Posts