Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yep worthless glad we keep them. You just love your .500 QB

 

Was open all season with or without Sammy. Fact

major booby, your big shtick seems to be based on your argument that Taylor has regressed. Let's ignore the fact that the bills had serious injuries at WR. Now, here's one example of several I can provide. QB1 we'll call him, had a rating of 77 his first year with 17 TDs and 16 Ints, then his second year he had a 67.5 rating and 11 TDs with 15 ints. Based on how you analyze qbs, would you recommend dropping this qb and bringing in a game manager like hoyer?

Major booby, here's another example. QB2 we'll call him. Year 2, he had a 99 rating with 17 TDs and 9 ints. In year 3 he "regressed." His rating was 75 and he had 18 TDs with 23 INTs. Would you get rid of him. And bring a game manager like Hoyer?

  • Replies 280
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I agree that our offense scores enough points to win games but how much is tyrod responsible for the point production? If we didn't have lesean McCoy our point production would be much different. I feel that he is more responsible than tyrod is. For the role tyrod plays I don't feel he's worth the money . His role is pass 18 times a game for 175 yards, don't turn the ball over, scramble for 50, and throw occasional screens and run option plays. Imagine our offense with an added passing dimension...he had a good game against Miami but does that erase the several games earlier in the season where he looked like a mobile version of Trent Edwards?

Posted

Fine, get rid of Tyrod. But don't do it until you have someone Better to replace him.

People think you can dump the guy and we'll just keep churning out a top 7 offense. I don't get that mindset.

Posted

I agree that our offense scores enough points to win games but how much is tyrod responsible for the point production? If we didn't have lesean McCoy our point production would be much different. I feel that he is more responsible than tyrod is. For the role tyrod plays I don't feel he's worth the money . His role is pass 18 times a game for 175 yards, don't turn the ball over, scramble for 50, and throw occasional screens and run option plays. Imagine our offense with an added passing dimension...he had a good game against Miami but does that erase the several games earlier in the season where he looked like a mobile version of Trent Edwards?

Well, the easy response is Gillislee has a significantly higher YPC avg (5.5 vs 6.2) than Shady. So anything else points out that it's complicated, and there is no way to know for sure how things might pan out with changes. But we are just fine in points scored, which is how you WIN GAMES. The offense is working, the D sucks despite talented guys. Hmmmmmm

Posted

I think a first round qb could do what tyrod does for a lot less money. Tyrod doesn't turn the ball over bc he takes no risks . He's usually a one read qb and doesn't release the ball until he's certain it's safe. There's no anticipation, he usually finds receivers very late in their route and doesn't give them the ability to run after the catch. Tyrod has also had tons of time to throw the ball. Despite a great line and strong running game he still puts up pedestrian numbers .

Posted

He only has tons of time to throw because he buys himself an extra couple seconds dancing around. It's a flawed stat. Mobile QBs always have the metric showing them with most time to pass.

Posted (edited)

I think a first round qb could do what tyrod does for a lot less money. Tyrod doesn't turn the ball over bc he takes no risks . He's usually a one read qb and doesn't release the ball until he's certain it's safe. There's no anticipation, he usually finds receivers very late in their route and doesn't give them the ability to run after the catch. Tyrod has also had tons of time to throw the ball. Despite a great line and strong running game he still puts up pedestrian numbers .

Sure it's always easy.........until you have to name the guy. Who exactly is that guy? Theory doesn't count. Who is the guy you will bet your future on? This looks like a weak QB draft. Is there an EJ you like? I'm all ears as I'm not the guru, but....

Edited by Augie
Posted

Watson

 

Nice, and bold. I like that. So many don't like his lack of improvement. He may be the guy..... I don't know. Now, will he make it to our pick?

Posted

I agree that our offense scores enough points to win games but how much is tyrod responsible for the point production? If we didn't have lesean McCoy our point production would be much different. I feel that he is more responsible than tyrod is. For the role tyrod plays I don't feel he's worth the money . His role is pass 18 times a game for 175 yards, don't turn the ball over, scramble for 50, and throw occasional screens and run option plays. Imagine our offense with an added passing dimension...he had a good game against Miami but does that erase the several games earlier in the season where he looked like a mobile version of Trent Edwards?

According to ESPN and MajBobby TT ranks 10th in the NFL for QB's in:

 

"Number of points contributed by a quarterback over the season, accounting for QBR and how much he plays, above the level of an average quarterback."

 

http://www.espn.com/nfl/qbr/_/sort/qbpaa

Posted

I think a first round qb could do what tyrod does for a lot less money. Tyrod doesn't turn the ball over bc he takes no risks . He's usually a one read qb and doesn't release the ball until he's certain it's safe. There's no anticipation, he usually finds receivers very late in their route and doesn't give them the ability to run after the catch. Tyrod has also had tons of time to throw the ball. Despite a great line and strong running game he still puts up pedestrian numbers .

 

Aaaaaaaaaaaaamen.

Posted (edited)

I agree that our offense scores enough points to win games but how much is tyrod responsible for the point production? If we didn't have lesean McCoy our point production would be much different. I feel that he is more responsible than tyrod is. For the role tyrod plays I don't feel he's worth the money . His role is pass 18 times a game for 175 yards, don't turn the ball over, scramble for 50, and throw occasional screens and run option plays. Imagine our offense with an added passing dimension...he had a good game against Miami but does that erase the several games earlier in the season where he looked like a mobile version of Trent Edwards?

the quarterbacks role is to score points and run the offense, rushing or passing. He has a hand in both his runs on third down extending drive payoff in touchdowns and points. His missed throws are the down side but to pretend we can disect how much he contributes is Jeremy White territory it is trying to hard to discredit the qb. The bottom line and frankly the only thing that matters is 26 points a game is outstanding and 6th in the league and he deserves full credit as the staring qb. The added passing attack comes with added turnovers as well the found a way for his passing efficiency to be huge. Fantasy football is for guys like Brees 5000 yards and the 4th 7-9 season in a row.

Aaaaaaaaaaaaame

we tried that with EJ ..you would be hoping and hope is not a game plan for success and YES rushing counts as a qb if its part of your game.

26 points a week for example puts seattle at 13-2 while if we scored 30 a week which would #2 in the NFL we are currently 10-5 its the D why we arent winning. This offense scores in actual football quit playing fantasy

Edited by CardinalScotts
Posted (edited)

Nice stat...interesting..his running ability shoots him up the standings. Look at his clutch weighted pass stat though....horrendous

If youre in the red zone do you care if TT scores rushing the ball in or passing the ball in? You dont. And you shouldnt. Even more so, its awesome to see QBs pass the ball up and down the field between the 20's and then they get to the red zone and the team cant punch it in. Its not a coincidence that our red zone offense is awesome.

 

Also "horrendous". Yeh his clutch weighted pass stat is BELOW AVEREGE but he still ranks 22, above Cam, Tannehill, bortles. Horrendous would be 29/30 who score 9.8 and -1.6 respectively.

 

But to come full circle here, you originally said tyrod didnt account for much scoring as a QB. Thats what you said. hes top 10 according to ESPN. So, youre wrong.

Edited by bobobonators
Posted

the quarterbacks role is to score points and run the offense, rushing or passing. He has a hand in both his runs on third down extending drive payoff in touchdowns and points. His missed throws are the down side but to pretend we can disect how much he contributes is Jeremy White territory it is trying to hard to discredit the qb. The bottom line and frankly the only thing that matters is 26 points a game is outstanding and 6th in the league and he deserves full credit as the staring qb. The added passing attack comes with added turnovers as well the found a way for his passing efficiency to be huge. Fantasy football is for guys like Brees 5000 yards and the 4th 7-9 season in a row.

 

we tried that with EJ ..you would be hoping and hope is not a game plan for success and YES rushing counts as a qb if its part of your game.

26 points a week for example puts seattle at 13-2 while if we scored 30 a week which would #2 in the NFL we are currently 10-5 its the D why we arent winning. This offense scores in actual football quit playing fantasy

Tell me more about the Raiders and Steelers games. Fantasy Football is you forgetting Tyrod was MIA when it mattered but it's all good now for some reason.

 

More of that please, can't wait.

×
×
  • Create New...