Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Or that we should have started Brad Smith at QB or that Brandon Kaufman was the big redzone target we needed..... I hope you are right on Cardale but of those 3 calls you cite only Wilson was really any kind of outside bet. Anyone with eyes could tell Fitz was what he was and that Rex was a bad Head Coach.

 

 

 

To answer the question, I draft DeShaun Watson if he is there and the best receiver on the board if he isn't.

 

:) EXACTLY! -No one wanted to believe that either! -Five years later, STILL no playoffs, smmfh...

  • Replies 115
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Heard we could pick as low as 11

 

If we did that I would seriously take a QB if the value matches......

If we are close to top 10 i am trying to sell what i can to get Trubinksy

Posted

Nobody wanted to believe you because neither of them were any good.

 

:nana: Yep... That's what they WANTED you to think... No risk-it, no Biscuit! START CARDALE JONES!!!!

Posted

 

:nana: Yep... That's what they WANTED you to think... No risk-it, no Biscuit! START CARDALE JONES!!!!

I am all for risks. I'd have played Cardale from last week on. At this stage it seems he has more to lose than to gain from playing just a week 17 dead rubber.

Posted

I am all for risks. I'd have played Cardale from last week on. At this stage it seems he has more to lose than to gain from playing just a week 17 dead rubber.

 

At this point it's about live snaps for #7... Make it a more even competition in the spring...

Posted

QB, QB, QB

 

Finally get a good one everything else falls into place. Look no farther than Raiders ending their drought

There is no QB worthy of a first round pick. I agree they should draft a QB later though. Cardale is going to be a bust.

Posted

There is no QB worthy of a first round pick. I agree they should draft a QB later though. Cardale is going to be a bust.

And yet QBs will be taken in the first round . That's just how it is. So if you take one later you may be getting scraps. Maybe there will be another Dak who gets a DUI and slides down the board. I'm not confident in this current scouting staff to evaluate QBs.

Posted

To answer the question, I draft DeShaun Watson if he is there and the best receiver on the board if he isn't.

The book on Watson, elite athlete, can't read defenses.

 

We already have that in TT! Why draft another one.

 

Just keep TT, try to redo that idiot contract, and surround him with better talent!

 

WR, OT, S, DB's (not round 1) and LB's

Posted

The book on Watson, elite athlete, can't read defenses.

 

We already have that in TT! Why draft another one.

 

Just keep TT, try to redo that idiot contract, and surround him with better talent!

 

WR, OT, S, DB's (not round 1) and LB's

Will he play for Rookie contract. If not well get me the Rookie

Posted

I take best safety on the board.

Second option is a WR.

Take the best player at a position of need. QB, S, RT, WR. And those positions could change depending

upon who the head coach is and what the front office accomplishes in re-signing their own or other FA's.

Posted

And yet QBs will be taken in the first round . That's just how it is. So if you take one later you may be getting scraps. Maybe there will be another Dak who gets a DUI and slides down the board. I'm not confident in this current scouting staff to evaluate QBs.

 

Just cuz QB's are taken in the first round doesn't make them good picks (EJ!). I think we've seen a number of QB's succeed that were drafted after the first round (Russel Wilson, Derek Carr) and I think the idea that QB's taken after the first round are scraps is the big lie.

×
×
  • Create New...