26CornerBlitz Posted December 24, 2016 Author Posted December 24, 2016 maybe he thought his D needed a boost of confidence Some confidence when you send out ten men to defend after being shredded all game long.
NoSaint Posted December 24, 2016 Posted December 24, 2016 That cannot happen! Happened to rob all the time in Nola
TSOL Posted December 24, 2016 Posted December 24, 2016 Its not that big of a deal. With all the talent we have on D we should easily be able to stop um with 10 men
TakeYouToTasker Posted December 24, 2016 Posted December 24, 2016 Poor game management. The Ryan's signature dish.
Big Turk Posted December 24, 2016 Posted December 24, 2016 They looked like they had 10 men on the field all game against him in both games
Kelly the Dog Posted December 24, 2016 Posted December 24, 2016 Rex was trying to say that it was Gilmore who was not in, and that he was in the concussion protocol. So it's possible that was a problem with his replacement or whomever was calling the defensive groupings, which may or may not have been Rex. Rex needs to go regardless. This may or may not have been his fault.
Coach Tuesday Posted December 24, 2016 Posted December 24, 2016 If that doesn't get Rex fired, there is simply no accountability under the Pegulas. None.
26CornerBlitz Posted December 24, 2016 Author Posted December 24, 2016 Rex was trying to say that it was Gilmore who was not in, and that he was in the concussion protocol. So it's possible that was a problem with his replacement or whomever was calling the defensive groupings, which may or may not have been Rex. Rex needs to go regardless. This may or may not have been his fault. He's the HC and it falls on him no matter what.
Kelly the Dog Posted December 24, 2016 Posted December 24, 2016 (edited) He's the HC and it falls on him no matter what. That's not necessarily true. At all. I'm of the opinion that it was likely him calling the defense and groupings at that point in the game and not knowing Gilmore was there and making sure his replacement was on the field would be his responsibility and his fault. But that may not have been the case. It's very possible he called a specific defense and would expect his players in that defense to be on the field. If Gilmore is out his replacement should know he is part of that grouping. No defensive coach anywhere counts all 11 players on the field each time he calls a specific grouping, injury or not. Edited December 24, 2016 by Kelly the Dog
JOE IN HAMPTON ROADS Posted December 24, 2016 Posted December 24, 2016 Rex was trying to say that it was Gilmore who was not in, and that he was in the concussion protocol. So it's possible that was a problem with his replacement or whomever was calling the defensive groupings, which may or may not have been Rex. Rex needs to go regardless. This may or may not have been his fault. HC is accountable fir all coaching errors. Because he chooses his assistants. Probably his bumbling brother he hired out of pure nepotism. If that's the case we have all been royally screwed.
Freddie's Dead Posted December 24, 2016 Posted December 24, 2016 As bad as the Bills were under previous coaches, I've never seen this level of disorganization in an NFL coaching staff. Ever. This is EPICALLY bad.
JOE IN HAMPTON ROADS Posted December 24, 2016 Posted December 24, 2016 That's not necessarily true. At all. I'm of the opinion that it was likely him calling the defense and groupings at that point in the game and not knowing Gilmore was there and making sure his replacement was on the field would be his responsibility and his fault. But that may not have been the case. It's very possible he called a specific defense and would expect his players in that defense to be on the field. If Gilmore is out his replacement should know he is part of that grouping. No defensive coach anywhere counts all 11 players on the field each time he calls a specific grouping, injury or not. No, the HC hires assistants and is accountable for their errors. Its a basic tenet of leadership. Hire good assistants and you wont have issues.
WotAGuy Posted December 24, 2016 Posted December 24, 2016 Even if Gilmore wasn't hurt and he was out there for that play, it still would have gone down the way it did. Did you see Gilmore's tackling prowess this year at all? Me neither.
JOE IN HAMPTON ROADS Posted December 24, 2016 Posted December 24, 2016 Happened to rob all the time in Nola hmmmmmm
nucci Posted December 24, 2016 Posted December 24, 2016 Defend Rex all you want, this is the kind of thing that's just inexcusable. Buffalo has lacked a head coach capable of making good decisions in-game for this entire streak. If I were interviewing head coaches, I'd present them that exact game situation and ask them what they would do - 4th and 3 in overtime in a must-win game with little time left to get the ball. Anyone that says "punt" would be immediately escorted out of the building. These are the kinds of things where coaches like Belichick are worth their weight in gold. Not many are
JohnC Posted December 24, 2016 Posted December 24, 2016 Rex was trying to say that it was Gilmore who was not in, and that he was in the concussion protocol. So it's possible that was a problem with his replacement or whomever was calling the defensive groupings, which may or may not have been Rex. Rex needs to go regardless. This may or may not have been his fault. There is such a thing as having too many coaches and too many voices. The opportunity for confusion rises with so many staffers on the sidelines with overlapping responsibilities.
Kelly the Dog Posted December 24, 2016 Posted December 24, 2016 There is such a thing as having too many coaches and too many voices. The opportunity for confusion rises with so many staffers on the sidelines with overlapping responsibilities. I think that is very true and very likely could have led to the confusion and if that was the case that is definitely a buck stop here, HC problem and fault situation. You may well be right.
nucci Posted December 24, 2016 Posted December 24, 2016 There is such a thing as having too many coaches and too many voices. The opportunity for confusion rises with so many staffers on the sidelines with overlapping responsibilities. having too many BAD coaches
Dopey Posted December 24, 2016 Posted December 24, 2016 That's not necessarily true. At all. I'm of the opinion that it was likely him calling the defense and groupings at that point in the game and not knowing Gilmore was there and making sure his replacement was on the field would be his responsibility and his fault. But that may not have been the case. It's very possible he called a specific defense and would expect his players in that defense to be on the field. If Gilmore is out his replacement should know he is part of that grouping. No defensive coach anywhere counts all 11 players on the field each time he calls a specific grouping, injury or not. Yes kelly, it is true.
JohnC Posted December 24, 2016 Posted December 24, 2016 I think that is very true and very likely could have led to the confusion and if that was the case that is definitely a buck stop here, HC problem and fault situation. You may well be right. I've been a critic of Tyrod for his limitations. Today he made plenty of good throws and had in general a good game. Getting the ball to Watkins and Clay demonstrated that we can have a potent office. My problem with him still relates to his ability to read defenses and go through his progressions. But in general I have to acknowledge that he played well'
Recommended Posts