SoCal Deek Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 2 hours ago, row_33 said: Trump calls everyone having anything to do with Mexico a monster.... May I ask if you’ve ever been to Mexico?
row_33 Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said: May I ask if you’ve ever been to Mexico? one week in a high level resort i was just imitating how the media reacts to a Trump speech or Twitter, mentioning animals/monsters in the same paragraph as Mexico means the liberal media can quote him as calling all people from there are animals and monsters... Edited November 5, 2019 by row_33
B-Man Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 (edited) BYRON YORK: TRUMP’S NOT ACTING GUILTY: In short, Trump appears to be making no effort to conceal what he said to Zelensky, be it about his belief that other countries should bear more of the burden of foreign aid or what he wanted Ukraine to investigate about the 2016 election and about former Vice President Joe Biden and son, Hunter Biden. So what to make of a situation in which one side says the call is a smoking gun, while the other screams “READ THE TRANSCRIPT”? “Look at the circumstantial evidence surrounding this,” former independent counsel Kenneth Starr said in a recent interview. “[Did Trump say,] ‘Bring him in, bring him in here, and I want to talk to him privately?'” No. Instead, Starr explained, Trump chose a phone call, rather than a one-on-one meeting, to make his points with Zelensky. Remember when the president was accused of being secretive in a one-on-one conversation with Vladimir Putin with no one other than translators within earshot? This wasn’t that. “There were 17 people on the phone, including the secretary of state,” Starr continued. “The president was so, shall I say, open and transparent about it that that goes to his intent. There’s no corrupt bargain, or an attempt to achieve a corrupt bargain, as I see it.” Yeah, that’s because it’s all bull####, like the “Russian collusion” narrative whose place it took. . Edited November 6, 2019 by B-Man 2
Deranged Rhino Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 2 minutes ago, B-Man said: BYRON YORK: TRUMP’S NOT ACTING GUILTY: In short, Trump appears to be making no effort to conceal what he said to Zelensky, be it about his belief that other countries should bear more of the burden of foreign aid or what he wanted Ukraine to investigate about the 2016 election and about former Vice President Joe Biden and son, Hunter Biden. So what to make of a situation in which one side says the call is a smoking gun, while the other screams “READ THE TRANSCRIPT”? “Look at the circumstantial evidence surrounding this,” former independent counsel Kenneth Starr said in a recent interview. “[Did Trump say,] ‘Bring him in, bring him in here, and I want to talk to him privately?'” No. Instead, Starr explained, Trump chose a phone call, rather than a one-on-one meeting, to make his points with Zelensky. Remember when the president was accused of being secretive in a one-on-one conversation with Vladimir Putin with no one other than translators within earshot? This wasn’t that. “There were 17 people on the phone, including the secretary of state,” Starr continued. “The president was so, shall I say, open and transparent about it that that goes to his intent. There’s no corrupt bargain, or an attempt to achieve a corrupt bargain, as I see it.” Yeah, that’s because it’s all bull####, like the “Russian collusion” narrative whose place it took. . 17 people on the phone call you say? Naaaah....
B-Man Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 CHANGE: Trump Officially Pulls Out of ‘Disastrous’ Paris Agreement. The only way this story could be better is if Trump had also announced the formation of, say, “The Winners’ Agreement,” whose membership is limited to countries that actually lived up to their Paris Agreement commitments. . 1
DC Tom Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 1 hour ago, B-Man said: CHANGE: Trump Officially Pulls Out of ‘Disastrous’ Paris Agreement. The only way this story could be better is if Trump had also announced the formation of, say, “The Winners’ Agreement,” whose membership is limited to countries that actually lived up to their Paris Agreement commitments. . The Senate never ratified it - they never saw it, Obama "ratified it" himself in a press conference with the Chinese PM. How can you "pull out" of an agreement you were never in? 1
3rdnlng Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 5 minutes ago, DC Tom said: The Senate never ratified it - they never saw it, Obama "ratified it" himself in a press conference with the Chinese PM. How can you "pull out" of an agreement you were never in? Preemptive pullout?
Deranged Rhino Posted November 8, 2019 Posted November 8, 2019 48 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said: A career cog in the perma war machine doesn’t agree with ending his gravy train? Ya don’t say! Come on, Transplant. Take 45 out of the equation and think about what this author is advocating for and supporting — this is the same group that lied ya into 18 years of war on a credit card. They lost every right to the benefit of the doubt. Didn’t they? 1
SoCal Deek Posted November 8, 2019 Posted November 8, 2019 So now that apparently everyones hair is no longer on fire about Syria, the Kurds and Turkey....what’s next to get outraged over? Is it halftime? Weren’t we supposed to get orange slices and a Rice Krispie treat? 1
row_33 Posted November 8, 2019 Posted November 8, 2019 1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said: So now that apparently everyones hair is no longer on fire about Syria, the Kurds and Turkey....what’s next to get outraged over? Is it halftime? Weren’t we supposed to get orange slices and a Rice Krispie treat? each outrage only has a life cycle of 3-4 business days, then the dog has to go chase the tires on another moving car
Hedge Posted November 8, 2019 Posted November 8, 2019 Do you think it included a picture of the gay man they haven't killed yet? 1 1
row_33 Posted November 8, 2019 Posted November 8, 2019 8 minutes ago, Hedge said: Do you think it included a picture of the gay man they haven't killed yet? amazing how American liberals have no clue about anything that they aren't brainwashed to believe 1
Deranged Rhino Posted November 9, 2019 Posted November 9, 2019 Not really Trump's foreign policy -- but related to the general topic. Here's Crenshaw: 2
Koko78 Posted November 9, 2019 Posted November 9, 2019 4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Not really Trump's foreign policy -- but related to the general topic. Here's Crenshaw: The comments under the video itself are hysterical. Those morons actually think they won the exchange and "got him". 1
bbb Posted November 9, 2019 Posted November 9, 2019 I think it's because it's a chick in a sundress and white sneakers. I agree with anything they have to say. 1 1
Recommended Posts