Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
15 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

For clarity, you WANT a war with Iran?

Of course he does. Tibtard is willing to burn this country down if it meant getting rid of Trump. He is a enemy of the US.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, westside2 said:

Of course he does. Tibtard is willing to burn this country down if it meant getting rid of Trump. He is a enemy of the US.

Trump done stumbled his dumb ass into this very avoidable situation. 

 

Oh, those unforced errors sure do hurt. But there won’t be a war for bombing the stupid, sinister Saudis. Who’d go to war for them? 

Posted
29 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

It’s a global economy so the world really needs independence from oil, not just us. 

That’s what you want me to want. 

 

And no I do not. I actually wanted the Obama nuclear deal to keep going which was working. It worked so well that Trump was telling Iran to stay in the deal after he pulled out of it! <——— please read that last sentence again because it will be something you and all Trump supporters will forget almost immediately. 

You are the dumbest of the dumbasses. I suppose you think that everyone should be a net exporter of energy, eh?

Posted
39 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Trump done stumbled his dumb ass into this very avoidable situation. 

 

Oh, those unforced errors sure do hurt. But there won’t be a war for bombing the stupid, sinister Saudis. Who’d go to war for them? 

 

If the Saudis are "sinister", what's Iran?

  • Sad 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

If the Saudis are "sinister", what's Iran?

You deny the evilness of the Saudi regime? 

 

The Iranian regime is just as despicable, not sure why we cozy up to either of them. 

 

Oh, that’s right, the oil companies! 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

You deny the evilness of the Saudi regime? 

 

The Iranian regime is just as despicable, not sure why we cozy up to either of them. 

 

Oh, that’s right, the oil companies! 

 

That's not an answer. I was just curious as to what you deem Iran if the Saudis are "sinister". 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

That's not an answer. I was just curious as to what you deem Iran if the Saudis are "sinister". 

What’s your point

 

you do realize this is a Trump created crisis, right? He got all heavy on Iran and now the shooting has really started. 

 

I suspect thats why you are trying to make this about me. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

What’s your point

 

you do realize this is a Trump created crisis, right? He got all heavy on Iran and now the shooting has really started. 

 

I suspect thats why you are trying to make this about me. 

 

Still not an answer. The point is to hear your opinion on Iran. If KSA is "sinister" to you, what is Iran?

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Still not an answer. The point is to hear your opinion on Iran. If KSA is "sinister" to you, what is Iran?

 

I think what he’s saying is Iran was really cool and we had nothing to worry about with them because we had everything under control and.....TRUMP BAD!!! 

Edited by Chef Jim
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Trump: US 'locked and loaded depending on verification' of attack on Saudi oil field

 

"Saudi Arabia oil supply was attacked. There is reason to believe that we know the culprit, are locked and loaded depending on verification, but are waiting to hear from the Kingdom as to who they believe was the cause of this attack, and under what terms we would proceed!" Trump said.

 

https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/15/politics/trump-us-saudi-arabia-attack-iran-iraq/index.html

Posted
13 minutes ago, ALF said:

Trump: US 'locked and loaded depending on verification' of attack on Saudi oil field

 

"Saudi Arabia oil supply was attacked. There is reason to believe that we know the culprit, are locked and loaded depending on verification, but are waiting to hear from the Kingdom as to who they believe was the cause of this attack, and under what terms we would proceed!" Trump said.

 

https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/15/politics/trump-us-saudi-arabia-attack-iran-iraq/index.html

Following the Kingdoms lead? 

Posted
19 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Still not an answer. The point is to hear your opinion on Iran. If KSA is "sinister" to you, what is Iran?

The regime Trump wanted to sit down with? The no preconditions to meeting the leaders? Lol, ok! 

 

Still no answer! ?

_____

 

Yemen’s Houthi rebels warn of more attacks on Saudi oil facilities

3DYIGMGYNYI6TLDDGALHCFKD7Y.jpg
 
The threat comes days after the group claimed an assault on a refinery belonging to Saudi Arabia’s national oil company. President Trump had said Sunday the United States was “locked and loaded” and ready to respond.
Posted (edited)

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi drone attack not launched from Iraqi territory.

 

Kuwait is investigating accounts that a drone intruded into its airspace and flew over the royal palace on the same day the Saudi oil facilities were targeted.

 

Kuwait's Al-Rai newspaper said at dawn on Saturday, an unmanned drone about the size of a small car descended to a height of about 250 metres (820 feet) over the palace, before turning on its lights and flying away.

 

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/09/saudi-oil-attacks-latest-updates-190916102800973.html

 

That sounds way too sophisticated for Houthi rebels

Edited by ALF
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

Couldn't have said it better myself - you go, girl!

 

 

 

It would be interesting what her (and your) responses would have been had he gone in “guns a’blazing” before he had more information on who was responsible. 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

I also have animus against the Saudis

 

sept-11-new-york-twin-towers-gty-jc-1805

Time to invite the Taliban to Camp David! 

 

 

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/john-bolton-left-trump-hawkish-iran

Quote

 

ormer National Security Advisor John Bolton reportedly left the White House because he opposed President Donald Trump opting to soften his administration’s pressure campaign against Iran.

 

 

In an Axios report published on Saturday, an unnamed Bolton ally said that Bolton, an outspoken advocate for hawkish foreign policy measures, resigned after Trump told him in a meeting last week that he was considering lifting some sanctions on Iran.

After Bolton’s ouster, Trump told the press that he was considering talks with Iranian president Hassan Rouhani on Tehran’s nuclear program and the administration’s sanctions.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo admitted that there were “definitely” areas of disagreement with the ex-national security advisor, but declined to specify.

 

 

 
Posted

I don't put it past the Saudis to attack their own property (with no casualties of course) to get the United States a little closer to striking Iran.  

 

IMO, al-Qaeda and ISIS are their Hezbollah-like creations when they need to get dirty.  

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...