Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
44 minutes ago, GG said:

 

Perhaps that's why Jared & Lighthizer have been at the tip of the negotiations to ensure that it isn't simply a money dump.

 

In any event, you can't expect instant results, but if you offer the carrot and stick of investing in Central America and force them to change laws which allow those business investments to thrive, then you start chipping away at the problem.  That is far more effective than trying to police a 5,000 mile borderline.

I'm still of the opinion that the catalyst of change really has to come from the people of the country. We spilt our blood and paid the dues to form this country. We earned it. They'll never get better than what they now have if they don't earn it themselves.

Posted
1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said:

I'm still of the opinion that the catalyst of change really has to come from the people of the country. We spilt our blood and paid the dues to form this country. We earned it. They'll never get better than what they now have if they don't earn it themselves.

 

The Central American countries have been in a perpetual civil war for the last 2 generations and you think more bloodshed is the cure?

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, GG said:

 

Perhaps that's why Jared & Lighthizer have been at the tip of the negotiations to ensure that it isn't simply a money dump.

 

In any event, you can't expect instant results, but if you offer the carrot and stick of investing in Central America and force them to change laws which allow those business investments to thrive, then you start chipping away at the problem.  That is far more effective than trying to police a 5,000 mile borderline.

 

Mexico and Central America have missed giant economic opportunities.  Those countries have low cost labor and the largest marketplace in their backyard (the U.S.) and while some manufacturing and exports have resulted, they could have been like China in terms of growing a manufacturing economy.  In addition they are full of natural resources yet haven't capitalized on that to the extent they could.  These are cultures of corrupt leadership which is very hard to change.  To your point though, we should be working better with them. 

Edited by keepthefaith
Posted
16 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

Mexico and Central America have missed giant economic opportunities.  Those countries have low cost labor and the largest marketplace in their backyard (the U.S.) and while some manufacturing and exports have resulted, they could have been like China in terms of growing a manufacturing economy.  In addition they are full of natural resources yet haven't capitalized on that to the extent they could.  These are cultures of corrupt leadership which is very hard to change.  To your point though, we should be working better with them. 

 

You're preaching to the choir.  The corruption is almost codified into national laws.   There was hope that NAFTA would provide a spark in Mexico to liberalize their markets, but it was very slow because they still put big guards around foreign ownership.  The ultimate promise never came fast, but has trickled in over the various administrations.

 

who knows, maybe AMLO will be the catalyst to break up the family business cartels, but hopefully he will open up the country for more investment and not renationalize. So far, he's been talking the right tune.

Posted
4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Could go in the media thread too -- but considering this is hitting right as he's going to London... 

Link to CNN saying he said she was nasty! 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

Either Guaido has been rendered irrelevant, or Maduro did something to piss Putin off...

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...