keepthefaith Posted December 21, 2018 Posted December 21, 2018 1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Why? They come and go all the time. For a little comparison, he's been on the job for 700 days and leaves in a bunch more days - under Obama, Panetta served 606 days, Hagel 720 and Ashe Carter 702 (he left when Trump came on) and no one wet their pants over their leaving. Secretaries of Defense. Click on the bio to see how long in office (if you care about that sort of thing). All true and relevant but I really like Mattis's no nonsense approach. Cabinet turnover is common but Trump is having more than his fair share and we're losing a good one here. Prefer that Mattis would stay.
B-Man Posted December 21, 2018 Posted December 21, 2018 TRUMP’S GREAT TALENT IS HIS ABILITY TO DRIVE PEOPLE CRAZY: For example: He’s even got Hillary Clinton, of all people, telling us that actions have consequences. A consequence of Hillary’s actions in Libya — “we came, we saw, he died — was black people being sold as slaves in open-air slave markets. So maybe she should sit this one out. But note how despite her dreadful track record, she’s still treated as part of the competent establishment. Because, in fact, competence is not required for membership in the establishment, as the least decade or two demonstrate. UPDATE: Is Trump speaking for the “forgotten part of America” that actually fights its wars? “And in the post-election analysis of the 2016 cycle, discussion of war fatigue has been all but absent. This oversight may plausibly be due to the fact that most American elites in the chattering class have not, at least in recent years, been directly affected by on-going conflicts. Children of elites are not as likely to serve and die in the Middle East, and elite communities are thus less likely to make this a point of conversation. The costs of war remain largely hidden, and an invisible inequality of military sacrifice has taken hold.” by Glenn Reynolds https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/316476/ 2
yall Posted December 22, 2018 Posted December 22, 2018 (edited) This time they are right though. He's a ***** ***** for pulling out of Syria. He ***** over the Kurds and is basically letting that ***** Erdogan run the show. To call Trump a half-wit is an insult to the mentally challenged. Edited December 22, 2018 by yall
DC Tom Posted December 22, 2018 Posted December 22, 2018 1 hour ago, yall said: This time they are right though. He's a ***** ***** for pulling out of Syria. He ***** over the Kurds and is basically letting that ***** Erdogan run the show. To call Trump a half-wit is an insult to the mentally challenged. 2012 called, they want their foreign policy back. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted December 22, 2018 Posted December 22, 2018 3 hours ago, yall said: This time they are right though. He's a ***** ***** for pulling out of Syria. He ***** over the Kurds and is basically letting that ***** Erdogan run the show. To call Trump a half-wit is an insult to the mentally challenged. The french are taking the place of the American forces in theater. No one is abandoning the Kurds. It's just the neocon and neoliberals trying to convince you it's a disaster to pull out of a war that's never been formally declared or authorized by congress.
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 22, 2018 Posted December 22, 2018 Yellow vest protests are light today. Heck, it is the holiday season.
plenzmd1 Posted December 22, 2018 Posted December 22, 2018 10 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: The french are taking the place of the American forces in theater. No one is abandoning the Kurds. It's just the neocon and neoliberals trying to convince you it's a disaster to pull out of a war that's never been formally declared or authorized by congress. 2 so..we gunna hold Trump to that standard moving forward?
GG Posted December 22, 2018 Posted December 22, 2018 11 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: The french are taking the place of the American forces in theater. No one is abandoning the Kurds. It's just the neocon and neoliberals trying to convince you it's a disaster to pull out of a war that's never been formally declared or authorized by congress. There's still zero evidence that Trump acts based on a carefully thought out plans rather than the color of his cereal in the morning. 2
The_Dude Posted December 22, 2018 Posted December 22, 2018 Trump’s domestic policy is GREAT! His foreign policy is niave and pretty much wrong. Im hoping for a 2020 ticket with Mad Dog!
B-Man Posted December 22, 2018 Posted December 22, 2018 Here’s Why Trump Made The Right Decision On Troops In Syria An in-depth look, as someone who has spent time on the ground in Iraq and Syria with U.S. troops, local tribal militias, and rebel forces since 2005. By Oubai Shahbandar .
B-Man Posted December 22, 2018 Posted December 22, 2018 RICHARD FERNANDEZ: Ours To Reason Why. If there’s one good thing about the political crisis triggered Trump’s decision to withdraw from Syria it’s been to make people realize the US is there. As Seth Harp in the New Yorker noted, it has done everything possible to conceal that fact. . . . Perhaps more people than were ever aware of the combat presence in Syria are outraged the US is leaving it and that is a good thing. The lack of awareness was the result of the breakdown of the national security debate and the abdication by Congress of its role in war making. The public is now like a man waking up in a strange city with a 3 week growth of beard with no memory of how he got there. As the Los Angeles Times noted the US inherited a whole bunch of shadow wars from the past administrations. “Before he took office in 2008, Barack Obama vowed to end America’s grueling conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. During his second term, he pledged to take the country off what he called a permanent war footing. … U.S. military forces have been at war for all eight years of Obama’s tenure, the first two-term president with that distinction. He launched airstrikes or military raids in at least seven countries: Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan.” But they all went into the back pages. .
Tiberius Posted December 22, 2018 Posted December 22, 2018 Losing the Cold War we thought we won Quote Indeed, a Soviet leader hardly could have outlined a better scenario than Trump has created for Putin: A rift between the United States and NATO allies over the future of the alliance. A U.S. demand that Russia be returned to the Group of Seven , as Russia continues provocations in Ukraine. A U.S. threat to pull out of the World Trade Organization,and a round of U.S.-imposed tariffs that severely weakened it. A U.S. president abandoning human rights, accepting Saudi Arabia’s murder of a U.S.-based journalist and embracing repressive leaders around the globe. A U.S. president creating a rift with Europe over Iran (the nuclear agreement) and climate change (the Paris accord). A U.S. president embracing as “very honorable” North Korea’s brutal dictator without any tangible concessions on nuclear weapons. A U.S.-launched trade war that, the Federal Reserve saidthis week, is partially responsible for cooling worldwide growth. Lost confidence among Americans in elections, the Justice Department, the FBI, the courts and the free press. And the loss of a bipartisan consensus against the Russian threat. Forty percent of Republicans called Russia an ally or friend in a Gallup poll, up from 22 percent in 2014. Why has Trump squandered so much for so little? Maybe it’s because, during the 2016 campaign, Russia was privately negotiating a business deal in Moscow with him and releasing stolen documents that hurt his Democratic opponent. (Meanwhile, Trump was praising Putin and his campaign was softening the GOP platform on Russia.) Whether special counsel Robert S. Mueller III concludes there was a quid pro quo, Putin clearly has benefited from Trump’s presidency. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/its-official-we-lost-the-cold-war/2018/12/21/1c3b52b0-0565-11e9-b5df-5d3874f1ac36_story.html?utm_term=.b9af323bb3d2
Deranged Rhino Posted December 22, 2018 Posted December 22, 2018 2 hours ago, plenzmd1 said: so..we gunna hold Trump to that standard moving forward? When it comes to starting wars? Yes. 1
GG Posted December 22, 2018 Posted December 22, 2018 It's as if Trump's inner circle is full of neocons who are upset over last week's announcements. First Mattis, now Brett McGurk. 2
The_Dude Posted December 22, 2018 Posted December 22, 2018 https://www.foxnews.com/politics/brett-mcgurk-us-envoy-to-anti-isis-coalition-resigns-in-wake-of-trump-decision-to-withdraw-from-syria Trump has gone full retard and is losing all his competent horses. 2 hours ago, B-Man said: Here’s Why Trump Made The Right Decision On Troops In Syria An in-depth look, as someone who has spent time on the ground in Iraq and Syria with U.S. troops, local tribal militias, and rebel forces since 2005. By Oubai Shahbandar . Would it be wrong of me to just discard this without reading it because I’m Team Mattis? Cause that’s what I’m doing.
Deranged Rhino Posted December 22, 2018 Posted December 22, 2018 50 minutes ago, GG said: It's as if Trump's inner circle is full of neocons who are upset over last week's announcements. First Mattis, now Brett McGurk. There was a deal made with the establishment when Trump won. That deal included him adding certain people to his staff - including Preibus, Mattis, and a few others. That deal has concluded.
Magox Posted December 22, 2018 Posted December 22, 2018 I'm not going to debate whether it was the right policy move or not. This whole mid east strategy has conflicted me for some time now. But it's hilarious how all of a sudden the mainstream media and leftists have now become military hawks who want the US to continue on with the war. TDS is a real thing folks. 4
B-Man Posted December 22, 2018 Posted December 22, 2018 20 minutes ago, The_Dude said: Would it be wrong of me to just discard this without reading it because I’m Team Mattis? Cause that’s what I’m doing. It would certainly match your standard of making up your mind without hearing all viewpoints..................so go ahead. .
Deranged Rhino Posted December 22, 2018 Posted December 22, 2018 2 minutes ago, Magox said: I'm not going to debate whether it was the right policy move or not. This whole mid east strategy has conflicted me for some time now. But it's hilarious how all of a sudden the mainstream media and leftists have now become military hawks who want the US to continue on with the war. TDS is a real thing folks. This is the most interesting thing to track for me personally. People who are TDS addled will be exposing themselves more than usual with their coverage of this news. The fighting has never been accurately covered in 17 years. It's not going to start now.
Recommended Posts