dave mcbride Posted December 12, 2016 Posted December 12, 2016 (edited) I did not know this although some have speculated on it. If he is injured now and remains injured on the third day of the 2017, which I think is March 3 (it could be anything, presumably -- knee, shoulder, foot, etc.), his contract is FULLY GUARANTEED. Jay Skurski talks about it in this video: http://buffalonews.com/2016/12/11/video-teams-takeaway-following-bills-loss-steelers/?utm_campaign=puma&utm_medium=social&utm_source=Twitter#link_time=1481499237 . Now we know why Whaley will do almost anything to prevent Taylor from playing, including trying to get the coach fired. The provision isn't controversial, in my opinion -- it's pretty typical. But at some point you have to decide to either cut bait or keep fishing, and that point is now. If they don't believe in Taylor, they have stop playing him NOW for the sake of the franchise. From Ryan's perspective, though, Taylor gives him by far and away the best chance to win despite his flaws. Ryan doesn't want to go down with a losing record, I can guarantee you that. Good times! Edited December 12, 2016 by dave mcbride
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 12, 2016 Posted December 12, 2016 I did not know this although some have speculated on it. If he is injured now and remains injured on the third day of the 2017, which I think is March 3 (it could be anything, presumably -- knee, shoulder, foot, etc.), his contract is FULLY GUARANTEED. Jay Skurski talks about it in this video: http://buffalonews.com/2016/12/11/video-teams-takeaway-following-bills-loss-steelers/?utm_campaign=puma&utm_medium=social&utm_source=Twitter#link_time=1481499237 . Now we know why Whaley will do almost anything to prevent Taylor from playing, including trying to get the coach fired. The provision isn't controversial, in my opinion -- it's pretty typical. But at some point you have to decide to either cut bait or keep fishing, and that point is now. If they don't believe in Taylor, they have stop playing him NOW for the sake of the franchise. From Ryan's perspective, though, Taylor gives him by far and away the best chance to win despite his flaws. Ryan doesn't want to go down with a losing record, I can guarantee you that. Good times! Then that settles it. He needs to sit NOW.
NoSaint Posted December 12, 2016 Posted December 12, 2016 Gotta sit the guy -- it's a 2-3 year commitment if he takes a hit
MDH Posted December 12, 2016 Posted December 12, 2016 Whaley just ***LOVES**** to burn Pegula ca$h He doesn't do the contracts.
dave mcbride Posted December 12, 2016 Author Posted December 12, 2016 (edited) Whaley just ***LOVES**** to burn Pegula ca$h ? - Whaley didn't negotiate that deal, and injury provisions are common in contracts. In any event, the Bills negotiated a very team friendly deal that gives them an easy out (provided Taylor doesn't get injured in what amounts to 3 glorified preseason games over the rest of December). Edited December 12, 2016 by dave mcbride
jms62 Posted December 12, 2016 Posted December 12, 2016 He doesn't do the contracts. You would be very naïve to think he doesn't put pressure on whomever to get these terms into the contract in order to get the player he wants.
dave mcbride Posted December 12, 2016 Author Posted December 12, 2016 You would be very naïve to think he doesn't put pressure on whomever to get these terms into the contract in order to get the player he wants. Again, injury provisions across sports are very common.
Virgil Posted December 12, 2016 Posted December 12, 2016 I'll be honest, I'm good sitting him then. This doesn't mean that I don't think we should pick up his option. But I think Rex goes and the next coach can make that decision. Also, maybe EJ shows something
jms62 Posted December 12, 2016 Posted December 12, 2016 Again, injury provisions across sports are very common. I thought the typical NFL contract wasn't guarenteed for injury.
dave mcbride Posted December 12, 2016 Author Posted December 12, 2016 (edited) I'll be honest, I'm good sitting him then. This doesn't mean that I don't think we should pick up his option. But I think Rex goes and the next coach can make that decision. Also, maybe EJ shows something Manuel is gone. If the Bills exercise their one year option on him, they have to pay him over $10 million (like they did with Gilmore this season)--and it's pretty well established that he isn't good. The only sensible option is to play Jones and see what he has. That doesn't mean they'll do the sensible thing ...I thought the typical NFL contract wasn't guarenteed for injury.For triggers and such they are, and especially for players with major contracts like Taylor (nearly $100 million on paper). They're not guaranteed for marginal players, who comprise most of the league. Such a provision is also part of the give and take of negotiations--taylor gave the team a very friendly deal, but he needs something in return. Injury is a sensible meeting point. Edited December 12, 2016 by dave mcbride
BarleyNY Posted December 12, 2016 Posted December 12, 2016 Was thinking about this too ever since I looked at TT's contract details a couple days ago. I sit TT, start Cardale and use EJ as backup if Jones gets injured.
The Frankish Reich Posted December 12, 2016 Posted December 12, 2016 Again, injury provisions across sports are very common.This was exactly the RG 3 situation in Washington. And the Redskins were not about to let him see the field at all last year because of it. In retrospect, that was a very wise move.
NoSaint Posted December 12, 2016 Posted December 12, 2016 I thought the typical NFL contract wasn't guarenteed for injury. its the exact reason kaepernick was benched last year(?). portions are guaranteed for injury. this portion looks to be one of those. This was exactly the RG 3 situation in Washington. And the Redskins were not about to let him see the field at all last year because of it. In retrospect, that was a very wise move. another good qb example
starrymessenger Posted December 12, 2016 Posted December 12, 2016 I thought the typical NFL contract wasn't guarenteed for injury. And regardless the guarantee is inconsistent with a deal structured to give the team an out if they are not satified with the results of the audition. Besides a new coach and front office maybe Pegs also needs a new lawyer. You know, one that remembers to put a substance abuse and suspension clause in Big Stuffs 100 MM deal or doesn't give Marrone 4MM to walk (though I was happy to see him go).
RyanC883 Posted December 12, 2016 Posted December 12, 2016 Whaley just ***LOVES**** to burn Pegula ca$h Whaley wants to SIT TT.
dave mcbride Posted December 12, 2016 Author Posted December 12, 2016 This was exactly the RG 3 situation in Washington. And the Redskins were not about to let him see the field at all last year because of it. In retrospect, that was a very wise move. Exactly. Thanks for mentioning that.
RyanC883 Posted December 12, 2016 Posted December 12, 2016 Was thinking about this too ever since I looked at TT's contract details a couple days ago. I sit TT, start Cardale and use EJ as backup if Jones gets injured. I'd do the exact same thing. Unless Jones is so raw that you don't want him to be exposed, hurt or otherwise. Playing EJ is the "safe move," he's a FA, won't be back next year. Jones would be the exciting move. I don't really care either way. I've seen enough of TT.
Recommended Posts