DCbillsfan Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 Pegula needs to give Whaley control of personnel. No more of this consensus stuff. It's not working. If Whaley screws it up get another GM. Keep Brandon away from any coaching hires and player acquisitions.
Mango Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 Pegula needs to give Whaley control of personnel. No more of this consensus stuff. It's not working. If Whaley screws it up get another GM. Keep Brandon away from any coaching hires and player acquisitions. This is it. And it was the problem in the Ralph era as well. Be involved, give input, learn as an owner. But ultimately let the professionals do their job
nucci Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 Not to get too in depth with this, but a great coach can decrease the percentage of the QB, but not by enough too change it's importance. The point of my post was to try and put a number on the importance of the QB. Do you think Belichick would take this team to the playoff? I think he could, but he most likely would replace our QB ASAP. I also believe that if Rex had a top 10 PASSING QB this team would be in the playoffs. To defend your opinion I think the days of winning with the run is over, and if Rex cannot change then he should go. Good points but I'm more concerned with the defense...blowing a 24-9 lead is not all on the offense.....
BaaadThingsMan Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 I don't judge the pegulas on the last 15 years of ralphs Bills. Since they took over the Bills are a .500 organization and this season isn't over so we don't know how it will end yet. IF changes need to be made, I trust the Pegulas to make the right calls and get things heading on a championship path.
nucci Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 I don't judge the pegulas on the last 15 years of ralphs Bills. Since they took over the Bills are a .500 organization and this season isn't over so we don't know how it will end yet. IF changes need to be made, I trust the Pegulas to make the right calls and get things heading on a championship path. Why?
BringBackOrton Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 (edited) Why? Because we're already seeing the wins pile up with them as owners. Well, offseason wins... Edited December 8, 2016 by jmc12290
Fadingpain Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 Cool! Get 2 we could use them. This is it. And it was the problem in the Ralph era as well. Be involved, give input, learn as an owner. But ultimately let the professionals do their job I'm in favor of letting the pros do their job, but not Whaley! This is the guy who figured EJ was the answer and then doubled down on stupidity with the Sammy Watkins trade up deal. As I've said 1,000 times on this forum, those 2 factors alone are grounds for immediate dismissal! You just can't be THAT inept as a GM and keep your job.
BaaadThingsMan Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 (edited) Why?smart in business, dedicated to success, short time owning the team but willing to learn. I trust that they will make an "informed" decision next time they make some changes and will get this thing turned around. Again, thats IF needed. This season has yet to play out so alot can happen that could make this all moot. Regardless, going forward I trust them completely for the reasons I stated until given enough reason not to. Edited December 8, 2016 by BaaadThingsMan
May Day 10 Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 You forget how unattractive the job was at that time. They couldn't even get top coaching candidates to schedule an interview. I believe Marrone was seen as an outside the box solution. And he was considered something of a rising star at the time. In retrospect, he seems to have seen the job as a stepping stone to a better job. To all those around here that think the Bills should just go out and hire the top people have to ask themselves why any of them would want to come to this franchise. While you're there, pick up one of those elite football czars who are clogging the shelves. The largest part that makes buffalo an unattractive market, is the management structure. You get hired and its not a great place to flourish. There are a lot of people with clout and say. Lots of cooks in the kitchen, and some are bad cooks. It percolated publicly a little bit with the marrone era. He essentially quit (the second HC to do so in a decade). These guys talk. During the offseason of the marrone hire, they could have brought andy reid in, assured him that he would have the keys to the car, and given him the contract.... he would most certainly have considered buffalo.
C.Biscuit97 Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 The largest part that makes buffalo an unattractive market, is the management structure. You get hired and its not a great place to flourish. There are a lot of people with clout and say. Lots of cooks in the kitchen, and some are bad cooks. It percolated publicly a little bit with the marrone era. He essentially quit (the second HC to do so in a decade). These guys talk. During the offseason of the marrone hire, they could have brought andy reid in, assured him that he would have the keys to the car, and given him the contract.... he would most certainly have considered buffalo. Oh please. The first thing coaches and players say when they get here is how awesome the Pegulas are. I do agree on Reid. So underrated.
Iraq Vet Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 Been a fan since I was 13.... (1983). I am starting to lose hope. The Bills can't even get blind luck.... in the draft after all these years or coaches.
nucci Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 smart in business, dedicated to success, short time owning the team but willing to learn. I trust that they will make an "informed" decision next time they make some changes and will get this thing turned around. Again, thats IF needed. This season has yet to play out so alot can happen that could make this all moot. Regardless, going forward I trust them completely for the reasons I stated until given enough reason not to. all things point to the Pegula's choosing Ryan as HC...I don't have confidence in them. They allowed LaFontaine to choose Ted Nolan as coach
Big Turk Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 How bout stop having multiple players at the same position go down year after year? That might be enough... Last year it was RBs, this year WRs, along with sprinkling in a few other starters it becomes tough to overcome... We have dudes who are playing more plays at WR this year then they will combined for the rest of their careers... I get that there has to be someone to "blame", but honestly we are fielding a team of scrubs at WR and our stud WR in Watkins isn't 100%...looks more like 70% to me, not getting separation like he normally does... We certainly are not having injury luck go our way...
Nihilarian Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 The Oakland Raiders say hello. They have a defensive coach with a very, very bad defense. Know the difference? A QB. It isn't just the QB. The Raiders also have an O-line that has allowed 22 sacks which is about the lowest sack total in the league. They also have some really good receivers and running backs. While the Raider defense might not be in the top 15 stats wise and they are currently ranked 30th. They get the turnovers, stops on third down when needed against even the good teams which is something Buffalo fails to do against good teams. Kinda why the Bills didn't sack Derek Carr. The Raiders have a linebacker that might have been worth two first round picks over a glass WR who can't stay healthy.
Big Turk Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 (edited) It isn't just the QB. The Raiders also have an O-line that has allowed 22 sacks which is about the lowest sack total in the league. They also have some really good receivers and running backs. While the Raider defense might not be in the top 15 stats wise and they are currently ranked 30th. They get the turnovers, stops on third down when needed against even the good teams which is something Buffalo fails to do against good teams. Kinda why the Bills didn't sack Derek Carr. The Raiders have a linebacker that might have been worth two first round picks over a glass WR who can't stay healthy. Julio Jones was a glass WR at one point too...same injury...almost same stats per game through 2 years...how quickly people forget... Now people just call him the best WR in football Edited December 8, 2016 by matter2003
26TrapDraw Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 Find the right QB.So much this. Look at Oakland. Without Carr they win 5 games this season.
26CornerBlitz Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 So much this. Look at Oakland. Without Carr they win 5 games this season. Well Matt FN McGloin certainly isn't a playoff caliber QB.
PatsFanNH Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 Break Both Brady's legs and his throwing arm and we are in the thick of things for the division Nah Jimmy G still lead the Pats to an 11-5 record next year.. you forget that the emperor still there to lead the empire to glory. Lol To turn the Bills around (IMO) starts at the top with the owner, he has to go out and get a true President of football operations who would guide the team down a path for the best 5-10 years. That person would higher HIS GM and change the scouting system to the people who will look for players he likes. This does work wether it be like NE, where BB does it all or say like Denver where Elway pulls all the strings. But that's what the Bills need a man with a plan and the drive to implement it with his people.
jms62 Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 (edited) I'm in favor of letting the pros do their job, but not Whaley! This is the guy who figured EJ was the answer and then doubled down on stupidity with the Sammy Watkins trade up deal. As I've said 1,000 times on this forum, those 2 factors alone are grounds for immediate dismissal! You just can't be THAT inept as a GM and keep your job. Didn't he declare "All in" on EJ.... When I go "All In" at the poker table and am wrong they show me the door and thank me for playing. Edited December 8, 2016 by jms62
dpberr Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 (edited) The Bills on-field performance is the problem. They are well run business in many aspects otherwise. We have the luxury of pretty much focusing on on-field matters as a fan base. They aren't a debt-ridden franchise (Cowboys), don't have significant cash flow problems (Raiders), have issues on where they are going to play next year (Rams, Chargers, Raiders), a lackluster fan base (Jaguars), meddling ownership feuds (Saints, Titans) or nightmarish confluence of many of these things (Browns). The Donahoe experiment scared many in the organization. However, I think for the team to succeed, you need to let your general manager run the entire show. He or she picks the personnel - players and coaching staff. I think the team also needs to find a coach that knows where the NFL is going, not where it's been, not where it is. Successful coaches are always on the cusp of the next big thing in the NFL and we last had it with Levy (K-gun, no huddle) and Phillips (his take on the 3-4, especially in 1995.). Since then we've hired coaches either with coaching strategies that are well known and well schemed or outdated and figured out. Edited December 8, 2016 by dpberr
Recommended Posts