YoloinOhio Posted December 5, 2016 Posted December 5, 2016 The Jacoby Brissett-led Patriots' loss to the Bills could cost hand home field advantage to the Raiders http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2016/12/05/raiders-will-earn-home-field-over-patriots-if-both-finish-14-2/
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 5, 2016 Posted December 5, 2016 The Jacoby Brissett-led Patriots' loss to the Bills could cost hand home field advantage to the Raiders http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2016/12/05/raiders-will-earn-home-field-over-patriots-if-both-finish-14-2/ Hooray us
YoloinOhio Posted December 5, 2016 Author Posted December 5, 2016 I still think Pats would beat them in playoffs head to head regardless of where they play, but they have injuries mounting. Amendola now has high ankle sprain.
PromoTheRobot Posted December 5, 2016 Posted December 5, 2016 I still think Pats would beat them in playoffs head to head regardless of where they play, but they have injuries mounting. Amendola now has high ankle sprain.Judging by what I saw yesterday the Raiders could annihilate the Pats.
YoloinOhio Posted December 5, 2016 Author Posted December 5, 2016 (edited) Judging by what I saw yesterday the Raiders could annihilate the Pats.why? The reason I think Pats win is BB defensive strategy will limit their offense enough and Brady would have zero problem throwing all over their secondary. Blount would have a field day too. I also don't see them being handed the field position the Bills gave them (if we are just looking at what occurred yesterday) Edited December 5, 2016 by YoloinOhio
Beef Jerky Posted December 5, 2016 Posted December 5, 2016 Judging by what I saw yesterday the Raiders could annihilate the Pats. I doubt Belichick would rush 3 guys a bunch of times when it never worked once.
YoloinOhio Posted December 5, 2016 Author Posted December 5, 2016 That Raider defense is crap and I said before the game we would win if TT could take advantage of the secondary, he could not. Brady would have no such issue as we all know.
flutie5 Posted December 5, 2016 Posted December 5, 2016 They need to realign the divisions and put us with Detroit, Cincy, and Cleveland
rockpile Posted December 5, 2016 Posted December 5, 2016 this is our existence now. Yes, we have entered that phase of our fandom where we grasp at anything to try and make yet another painful season hurt less. I am SO PISSED OFF that the team I have loved all my life because of my family, my tradition, my home town, and more that I would love to be able to gather together the owners, players, managers, coaches, administrators, and ALL involved in this sham of a franchise and ask them WHY? The Buccaneers and Saints were the worst for the longest time, but they have won it all. The Browns had to pack up and leave town and become Ravens before they could win. Another small consolation to Bills Fans: Cleveland, Detroit, Houston, and Jacksonville have never been to the Super Bowl. Thirteen of thirty-two teams have never won the Lombardi.
YoloinOhio Posted December 5, 2016 Author Posted December 5, 2016 Yes, we have entered that phase of our fandom where we grasp at anything to try and make yet another painful season hurt less. I am SO PISSED OFF that the team I have loved all my life because of my family, my tradition, my home town, and more that I would love to be able to gather together the owners, players, managers, coaches, administrators, and ALL involved in this sham of a franchise and ask them WHY? The Buccaneers and Saints were the worst for the longest time, but they have won it all. The Browns had to pack up and leave town and become Ravens before they could win. Another small consolation to Bills Fans: Cleveland, Detroit, Houston, and Jacksonville have never been to the Super Bowl. Thirteen of thirty-two teams have never won the Lombardi. Who is doing that... it is just an article posted by Pro Football Talk about the Pats/Raiders...
BillsFan130 Posted December 5, 2016 Posted December 5, 2016 (edited) I agree that NE would beat Oakland regardless where it's played. Oakland is a good team but they aren;t a great team. Like you said above, Brady would eat their secondary alive. In saying that, if it's in Oakland, the Raiders would have a chance, if it was in NE, no way they win Edited December 5, 2016 by billsfan11
YoloinOhio Posted December 5, 2016 Author Posted December 5, 2016 I agree that NE would beat Oakland regardless where it's played. Oakland is a good team but they aren;t a great team. Like you said above, Brady would eat their secondary alive. In saying that, if it's in Oakland, the Raiders would have a chance, if it was in NE, no way they win I think they would have a chance. Don't really see a blowout either way. Just can't see Raiders beating Pats after watching both; plus the coaches and personnel.
PatsFanNH Posted December 5, 2016 Posted December 5, 2016 Raiders final 4: @ KC @ SD Indy @ DEN Pats: Ravens @ Denver Jets @ Miami I say the Raiders have a tougher schedule just because they face 3 division foes on the road and Indy has a decent O as well.. Pats tough Games are Denver and Ravens... possibly Miami if it means anything by then..
YoloinOhio Posted December 5, 2016 Author Posted December 5, 2016 Raiders final 4: @ KC @ SD Indy @ DEN Pats: Ravens @ Denver Jets @ Miami I say the Raiders have a tougher schedule just because they face 3 division foes on the road and Indy has a decent O as well.. Pats tough Games are Denver and Ravens... possibly Miami if it means anything by then.. I think Raiders lose Thursday and maybe at Denver. I think Pats win out but, at Denver is toughest game.
Recommended Posts