Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Say what you want but the guy has a rocket arm, has always played behind a crappy OLine and we have a strong run game. Furthermore Cutler is not afraid to take shots, Taylor plays too conservative for my liking and I'' sick and tired of watching the touch passes skipped in there like he's throwing stones across a lake.

  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

Cutler is slightly above average and vastly underrated by most football fans. I agree, we should acquire Cutler if we can. Tyrod, Cutler, and a (hopefully) developing Cardale Jones would be the best QB roster we've had in a long time. Plus, if Sammy ever stays healthy and you add another real threat at WR Cutler could be very good with us.

 

I know people knock his leadership and lack of elite play, but if you take an honest look at Cutler and what he has had in Chicago you realize he's worthy of a starting spot in the NFL. He would be an excellent addition to the team as a 1.b backup...get him and have Tyrod run more with the security.

Edited by dayman
Posted

Cutler is slightly above average and vastly underrated by most football fans. I agree, we should acquire Cutler if we can. Tyrod, Cutler, and a (hopefully) developing Cardale Jones would be the best QB roster we've had in a long time. Plus, if Sammy ever stays healthy and you add another real threat at WR Cutler could be very good with us.

 

I know people knock his leadership and lack of elite play, but if you take an honest look at Cutler and what he has had in Chicago you realize he's worthy of a starting spot in the NFL. He would be an excellent addition to the team.

Hold on... I'll be right back...

Posted

K im back...

 

TD/TURNOVER ratio since 2015 and winning % next to it since 2015.

 

1. Tom Brady - 5.7; .783

2. Dak - 4.6; .909

3. Tyrod - 3.33; .560

4. Russel Wilson - 2.94; .630

5. Rodgers - 2.82; .556

6. Brees - 2.71; .462

7. Cam - 2.63; .731

8. Alex Smith - 2.62; .692

9. Stafford - 2.48; .519

10. Cousins - 2.45; .556

11. Dalton - 2.39; .542

12. Carr - 2.25; .593

13. Palmer - 1.89; .615

14. Eli - 1.83; .519

15. Big Ben - 1.8; .619

16. Rivers - 1.73; .333

17. Mariota - 1.71; .375

18. Tannehill - 1.64; .481

19. M. Ryan - 1.62; .556

20. Winston - 1.59; .444

21. Bortles - 1.49; .259

22. Luck - 1.46; .412

23. Fitz - 1.39; .480

24. Bradford - 1.35; .500

25. Flacco - 1.15; .429

26. Cutler - 1.13; .350

 

 

CUTLER. HAHAHAHAHAHHA

Posted

Please, just no. I have been in Bears country for the last 19 years and have seen more than my fair share of Jay Cutler.

 

A big arm and a willingness to "take shots" is only part of the story. The good part.

 

The bad part? He gambles to much with the ball. He chokes in big moments.

 

Think of him as a more physically gifted Ryan Fitzpatrick, but with the same downsides.

 

Cutler is more likely to lose a game singlehandedly than he is to win one singlehandedly.

Posted

Cutler looks the part but he's the anti Tyrod in terms of protecting the football. Guy is a turnover machine.

Posted

Hold on... I'll be right back...

 

There are many teams that could be better with Cutler--Cleveland, Houston, NYJ, Cinci, SF, LA, Minnesota, Denver, and Washington (yea, I said it, Cousins is way overrated) would all be better with a healthy Cutler.

Posted

Say what you want but the guy has a rocket arm, has always played behind a crappy OLine and we have a strong run game. Furthermore Cutler is not afraid to take shots, Taylor plays too conservative for my liking and I'' sick and tired of watching the touch passes skipped in there like he's throwing stones across a lake.

 

Smokin' Jay doesn't care. No No No!

Posted

 

There are many teams that could be better with Cutler--Cleveland, Houston, NYJ, Cinci, SF, LA, Minnesota, Denver, and Washington (yea, I said it, Cousins is way overrated) would all be better with a healthy Cutler.

No.

Posted (edited)

Tyrod is 10x the QB Cutler is and I think Taylor is an average QB, that should tell you how I feel about Cutler.

 

If you're looking to tank and pull a Browns next year, Cutler would be a terrific option.

Edited by Estro
Posted

 

There are many teams that could be better with Cutler--Cleveland, Houston, NYJ, Cinci, SF, LA, Minnesota, Denver, and Washington (yea, I said it, Cousins is way overrated) would all be better with a healthy Cutler.

No to Cincy and no way to Washington!! LA has the 1st overall pick that's looked okay and even though I'm not a fan, no to the Vikings as well.
Posted

Say what you want but the guy has a rocket arm, has always played behind a crappy OLine and we have a strong run game. Furthermore Cutler is not afraid to take shots, Taylor plays too conservative for my liking and I'' sick and tired of watching the touch passes skipped in there like he's throwing stones across a lake.

This may be one of the worst ideas I've ever heard.

Posted

Please, just no. I have been in Bears country for the last 19 years and have seen more than my fair share of Jay Cutler.

 

A big arm and a willingness to "take shots" is only part of the story. The good part.

 

The bad part? He gambles to much with the ball. He chokes in big moments.

 

Think of him as a more physically gifted Ryan Fitzpatrick, but with the same downsides.

 

Cutler is more likely to lose a game singlehandedly than he is to win one singlehandedly.

The comparison to Fitz is the greatest Cutler analogy I've ever heard. I think we're save anyway, Kirsten Cavalleri or whatever her name is isn't going to come to Buffalo.
×
×
  • Create New...