Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

first of all Mack is unreal what a player

 

handled Watt last year....they will have a plan

 

still with a talented team raiders have given up

 

35-32-34-31-27-26-24 and haven't played a killer schedule

Edited by CardinalScotts
  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

We think Mills is a turnstile? Just watch the Chiefs/Broncos game. #74 for Denver is brutal, shouldn't even be on the field. Huston for KC is running around him like he is nothing but a road cone.

Posted

first of all Mack is unreal what a player

 

handled Watt last year....they will have a plan

 

still with a talented team raiders have given up

 

35-32-34-31-27-26-24 and haven't played a killer schedule

 

This is what is confusing about the Raiders defense.

 

They have talent, but they sure give up a lot of points.

Posted

We think Mills is a turnstile? Just watch the Chiefs/Broncos game. #74 for Denver is brutal, shouldn't even be on the field. Huston for KC is running around him like he is nothing but a road cone.

Yes. At some point the OC for Denver has to do something to help the RT. I hope our coaching staff will not try to leave Mills on an island with Mack.
Posted

Their defense is not very good. My fear is more the Bills Defense, they have not faired too well against good teams. It could be a real shootout.

Posted

 

This is what is confusing about the Raiders defense.

 

They have talent, but they sure give up a lot of points.

It has to be their 2ndary. Their D Line and LBs arent bad at all.

Posted

By many accounts, TT doesn't read the whole field anyways, has a tendency to prematurely run with the ball and still takes the unnecessary big hits he shouldnt. I see what you mean but it's not like we're rolling out Peyton Manning

Many accounts of tsw posters...

Posted

YOU HAVE THE BEST RUN O IN THE N.F.L. LET THAT SINK IN. OAKLANDS RUN D IS 26TH.

 

double mccoy's carries (he had 19). put felton in the backfield. use big sets. don't expose TT. have good pass plays out of play action. win the boring way.

Posted (edited)

Mills is the kind of player that you pick up and plug in during the season in desperation if you have a rash of injuries, knowing full well that someone much better has to replace him the next year when you've got more time to make a move.. Yet another Whaley blunder.

 

I don't think Whaley had a lot of confidence in Mills. I think he just failed in finding a better FA. No GM ever builds the team he wants. Sometimes there are cap issues. Sometimes you just get outbid. Sometimes the team before you picks the guy you had targeted in the draft.

 

I do hope though that DW makes this a bigger priority next year. It'd be too painful to see him in the starting lineup another year.

 

Btw, is it my imagination or does Mills hold a lot? I'm not an All-22 guy and never rewatch games. But watching live it seems that Mills holds on an unusually high percentage of plays to compensate for his lack of skill. Mostly he doesn't get flagged and when he does, it's just the price we have to pay for having Mills in there. If you told him not to hold, he'd be even more of a turnstile.

Edited by hondo in seattle
Posted

Just watching the replay of the Raiders against Carolina & Mack is a man among men A Lynn better have a good plan for him because he's gonna be there all day long ...

Posted

first of all Mack is unreal what a player

 

handled Watt last year....they will have a plan

 

still with a talented team raiders have given up

 

35-32-34-31-27-26-24 and haven't played a killer schedule

 

True, but can our D keep the Raiders from scoring over 21 points. Unlikely. And our offense is inconsistent. TT is terrible. Give McCoy the ball 30 times and throw to Watkins at least 10. Only way we win.

Posted

When the Bills moved up to draft Sammie Watkins, Khalil Mack was still on the board.

 

Would you trade Watkins for Mack, straight up?

 

At this point, I'd say no. The Bills have invested several other high draft picks in the LB position, and they've lucked out with Lorax and Zach Brown and Hughes. But, suppose they'd taken Mack when they had the chance, and made a different set of decisions later.

 

The question is, who's a better player, Watkins or Mack?

Posted

Just watching the replay of the Raiders against Carolina & Mack is a man among men A Lynn better have a good plan for him because he's gonna be there all day long ...

 

Against a relatively immobile guard playing as a fish out of water at right tackle.

×
×
  • Create New...