BringBackOrton Posted November 27, 2016 Posted November 27, 2016 I think the NFL is just a tad bit different than your office. If your job entailed having 11 guys trying to beat the hell out of you every week to the point they can cripple you, you may think different. Basically their job is to do whatever they can do (within the rules) to recover from the pain they go through, but that often isn't enough. I assume coaches aren't drug tested? If they were, I wonder how many who are ex-players would fail the tests? Could see coaches, say a guy like Ed Reed who likely has endured years of playing through pain, smoking some now after career is over to get rid of some of the never ending aches and pains. And maybe he has a prescription for it. I'd be fine with letting players smoke from say Sunday night until Wednesday to relieve pain, but don't want them playing under the influence so would 100% test everyone on Saturday morning to make sure they are clean for the game, but have no idea if tests can be done to so time sensitive? None of this is even relevant or up for debate.
boyst Posted November 27, 2016 Posted November 27, 2016 (edited) I think the NFL is just a tad bit different than your office. If your job entailed having 11 guys trying to beat the hell out of you every week to the point they can cripple you, you may think different. Basically their job is to do whatever they can do (within the rules) to recover from the pain they go through, but that often isn't enough. I assume coaches aren't drug tested? If they were, I wonder how many who are ex-players would fail the tests? Could see coaches, say a guy like Ed Reed who likely has endured years of playing through pain, smoking some now after career is over to get rid of some of the never ending aches and pains. And maybe he has a prescription for it. I'd be fine with letting players smoke from say Sunday night until Wednesday to relieve pain, but don't want them playing under the influence so would 100% test everyone on Saturday morning to make sure they are clean for the game, but have no idea if tests can be done to so time sensitive? my job involves getting the hell worked out of me. Leaving me in pain. Getting trampled. Getting drugged, kicked and stomped. I don't even use advil. Maybe I should smoke a dooby Also, what are the players doing post career? Yoga? Stretches? Exercising? I know a few ex players. They all went down to regular weights. Workout and eat healthy. And exercise profusely. If these players don't work out after their career I have nomercy Again . Not even relevant to the discussion. Which is what happens when us professionals debate weed. You got the weed expert. And the medical expert. Both chime in foolishly Edited November 27, 2016 by Boyst62
Nuncha Posted November 27, 2016 Posted November 27, 2016 Why is he still on the roster anyway? He's hardly played the past 2 seasons.
iinii Posted November 27, 2016 Posted November 27, 2016 (edited) tne NFLPA will never push for reducing penalties for weed. When and if they do, and when they give up so much to get the NFL to do it... The league will lose fans as quick as can be All those fantasy fans are going to leave in droves when the N.F.L relaxes pot rules. All casual fans are going to take a knee during the anthem in protest. And season ticket sales are going to plummet. Oh no! At least Monsanto and the Marley's will have some trippy ads during the game. Edited November 27, 2016 by iinii
boyst Posted November 27, 2016 Posted November 27, 2016 All those fantasy fans are going to leave in droves when the N.F.L relaxes pot rules. All casual fans are going to take a knee during the anthem in protest. And season ticket sales are going to plummet. Oh no! At least Monsanto and the Marley's will have some trippy ads during the game.uhhhh what
iinii Posted November 27, 2016 Posted November 27, 2016 uhhhh what you said they were going to lose fans as quick as possible.
boyst Posted November 27, 2016 Posted November 27, 2016 you said they were going to lose fans as quick as possible. they will
iinii Posted November 27, 2016 Posted November 27, 2016 they willExactly what are you basing that on? Because I find it laughable to say the least.
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch Posted November 27, 2016 Posted November 27, 2016 Thought it was kind of funny, think it was in the 3rd quarter, there was a commercial on TV for some med to take for Crohn's disease. (at least on the ST broadcast it was aired)
iinii Posted November 27, 2016 Posted November 27, 2016 Thought it was kind of funny, think it was in the 3rd quarter, there was a commercial on TV for some med to take for Crohn's disease. (at least on the ST broadcast it was aired)Humana I think it is. A bit ironic for sure.
boyst Posted November 27, 2016 Posted November 27, 2016 Exactly what are you basing that on? Because I find it laughable to say the least.let's take your opinion and my opinion and buy a ticket to Fiji
Bob in Mich Posted November 28, 2016 Posted November 28, 2016 Plants can be patented (https://www.uspto.gov/patents-getting-started/patent-basics/types-patent-applications/general-information-about-35-usc-161), so big pharma could actually make profits from cultivating marijuana, but they only invest resources into therapeutics that are efficacious. This is not accurate. If the plant was just discovered or if has been genetically modified, it can be patented. Otherwise, no. From the link you provided: As noted in the last paragraph of the statute, the plant patent must also satisfy the general requirements of patentability. The subject matter of the application would be a plant which developed or discovered by applicant, and which has been found stable by asexual reproduction. To be patentable, it would also be required: That the person or persons filing the application are those who actually invented the claimed plant; i.e., discovered or developed and identified or isolated the plant, and asexually reproduced the plant. That the plant has not been sold or released in the United States of America more than one year prior to the date of the application.
Maury Ballstein Posted November 28, 2016 Posted November 28, 2016 let's take your opinion and my opinion and buy a ticket to Fiji Not a single person will stop watching NFL because the players get access to medical marijuana. You're trying too hard.
boyst Posted November 28, 2016 Posted November 28, 2016 Not a single person will stop watching NFL because the players get access to medical marijuana. You're trying too hard. the disconnect between the middle class, average joe of this country and millionaire athletes is already quite large. Having them life the rock star lifestyle would just further separate and turn off fans that are already turning the game off
iinii Posted November 28, 2016 Posted November 28, 2016 the disconnect between the middle class, average joe of this country and millionaire athletes is already quite large. Having them life the rock star lifestyle would just further separate and turn off fans that are already turning the game offAnd smoking weed is symbolic of that? The average Joe is sparking up while watching. So try again please
boyst Posted November 28, 2016 Posted November 28, 2016 (edited) And smoking weed is symbolic of that? The average Joe is sparking up while watching. So try again pleaseno. Why no, theyre not. Most have tried marijuana, by most studies but most Americans are not smoking marijuana regularly. I can't wait until the traffic incidents skyrocket in legalzd states. Wait... they already have. By the way,your basis for your nonsense comes from where? How many americans smoke weed casually, as in at least once a month. Edited November 28, 2016 by Boyst62
Maury Ballstein Posted November 28, 2016 Posted November 28, 2016 the disconnect between the middle class, average joe of this country and millionaire athletes is already quite large. Having them life the rock star lifestyle would just further separate and turn off fans that are already turning the game off They live the rock and roll lifestyle with the million dollar contracts already. What does marijuana have to do with that ? So in summary You will be the only one tuning out but even then. No you won't. NFL is a bore this year and we still are watching
Coach Tuesday Posted November 28, 2016 Posted November 28, 2016 no. Why no, theyre not. Most have tried marijuana, by most studies but most Americans are not smoking marijuana regularly. I can't wait until the traffic incidents skyrocket in legalzd states. Wait... they already have. By the way,your basis for your nonsense comes from where? How many americans smoke weed casually, as in at least once a month. It's more than you think.
boyst Posted November 28, 2016 Posted November 28, 2016 It's more than you think. and less than many think. The idea that million dollar athletes need to be entitled to a drug that is illegal (for now) and have special rights to it that every day Americans don't in their workplace is laughable.
aristocrat Posted November 28, 2016 Posted November 28, 2016 and less than many think. The idea that million dollar athletes need to be entitled to a drug that is illegal (for now) and have special rights to it that every day Americans don't in their workplace is laughable. the nba stopped testing and it's more popular than ever.
Recommended Posts