B-Man Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 BREAKING: Trump to announce Supreme Court pick at 8pm Eastern Tomorrow night.
Benjamin Franklin Posted January 30, 2017 Author Posted January 30, 2017 Spicer took down his Onion retweet. Was there this morning. Press will enjoy asking him about it today.
boyst Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 BREAKING: Trump to announce Supreme Court pick at 8pm Eastern Tomorrow night.there is going to bea ton of heat on this saying he is posturizing this like American IIdol. Let's hope its Rueben Studard.
Tiberius Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 there is going to bea ton of heat on this saying he is posturizing this like American IIdol. Let's hope its Rueben Studard. Dems will block
DC Tom Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 Dems will block With what? Filibuster? Nope. Thank Harry Reid for that.
B-Man Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 THE NSC REORGANIZATION KERFUFFLE: In terms of organizing and sizing the National Security Council, Trump can do just about anything he wants. The NSC works for him. He can staff it to meet his needs. To say he can’t is Fake News. The UPI dispatch covers the basics. Trump also has pared the council to six deputy national security advisers, compared to the 23 on Obama’s council. Long overdue. Obama stacked his NSC with cronies. Loyalty to him came first. Having political chums or relatives in the mainstream media was an additional qualifier. It sure wasn’t military experience or other types of rubber-meets-the-road national security experience. Last night Glenn fisked Susan Rice’s latest act of naked hypocrisy. “The troika made up of Susan Rice, Samantha Power, and Hillary Clinton was perhaps the most disastrous foreign policy crew in American history.” Glenn was elaborating on this post at booksbikesboomsticks.blogspot.com. Trump has decided to downgrade NSC participation by the Director of National Intelligence and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. However, they are statutory advisers. However, the mainstream media and usual suspects are acting like the DNI and Chairman JCS are out of the loop. They aren’t. The BBC reports they’ll attend NSC Principals Committee meetings when discussions pertain to their areas. https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/the-nsc-reorganization-kerfuffle-in-terms-of-organizing-and-sizing-the-national-security-council-t/
Tiberius Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 With what? Filibuster? Nope. Thank Harry Reid for that. Go for it! I hope they get us to a majority vote senate, Good for Dems!
grinreaper Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 With what? Filibuster? Nope. Thank Harry Reid for that. SCOTUS nominees still need 60 votes.
Tiberius Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 SCOTUS nominees still need 60 votes. Tom's wrong?
DC Tom Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 SCOTUS nominees still need 60 votes. Nope. Only a simple majority. 60 votes were needed for cloture...but again, thanks to Harry Reid, that's no longer necessarily the case.
Tiberius Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 Nope. Only a simple majority. 60 votes were needed for cloture...but again, thanks to Harry Reid, that's no longer necessarily the case. Good, majority vote should be the rule
IDBillzFan Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 Nope. Only a simple majority. 60 votes were needed for cloture...but again, thanks to Harry Reid, that's no longer necessarily the case. This is the absolutely epitome of the phrase "Be careful what you wish for..." This will be your legacy, Harry. Well done.
Tiberius Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 This is the absolutely epitome of the phrase "Be careful what you wish for..." This will be your legacy, Harry. Well done. In the long run this benefits Dems
boyst Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 Dems will block we should have them play OC They'd do as good as Wood last year and be knob gobbled just the same.Go for it! I hope they get us to a majority vote senate, Good for Dems! don't you realize, mostly dye to Reid, this is bad for everyone? And now schumer who is half as smart is running the minority post and sure to blunder it? When we need a balance of power the Democrats fail at that as much as having full power.
Tiberius Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 we should have them play OC They'd do as good as Wood last year and be knob gobbled just the same. don't you realize, mostly dye to Reid, this is bad for everyone? And now schumer who is half as smart is running the minority post and sure to blunder it? When we need a balance of power the Democrats fail at that as much as having full power. Can someone translate this into English for me?
boyst Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 In the long run this benefits Dems again, and I know you're a perimecium but this benefits no one. Politics simply being left & right hurts us all. This can't benefit anyone. Ever. And you're too stupid to see that. Can someone translate this into English for me? raysis
grinreaper Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 Nope. Only a simple majority. 60 votes were needed for cloture...but again, thanks to Harry Reid, that's no longer necessarily the case. Yep. You're right. Now what are the chances that we actually get a vote?
Benjamin Franklin Posted January 30, 2017 Author Posted January 30, 2017 Yep. You're right. Now what are the chances that we actually get a vote? 51 votes is better. President picks. Senate advises and consents.* That's how the system is supposed to work. As long as Trump doesn't nominate a penguin, his pick should get approved. Enough with the stupid games. *except in undefined periods in which the Senate need not advise or consent.
Recommended Posts