Tiberius Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 Hilly tipped her own scales. The FBI weighed in on the election. It could just as easily have investigated Trump University 10 days before the election. It really was a fraud Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 That the FBI tipped the scales on the election, obviously with its investigation right before the election. I thought they had cleaned themselves up from the days where they harassed Martin King and spied on him. I guess they are still a right wing hit squad in part So let me get this right: you believe the FBI investigating the illegal distribution of federally classified emails to the laptop of an alleged pedophile who sexts 15-year-old girls makes the FBI a right-wing hit squad who intentionally tried to give the election to Trump? You believe THIS, but are convinced Benghazi was a made-up scandal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 The FBI weighed in on the election. It could just as easily have investigated Trump University 10 days before the election. It really was a fraud I'll take "The Left STILL Doesn't Know Why Hillary Lost!" for $250 Alex. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 That the FBI tipped the scales on the election, obviously with its investigation right before the election. I thought they had cleaned themselves up from the days where they harassed Martin King and spied on him. I guess they are still a right wing hit squad in part [This is an automated response.] You're an idiot. Created by DC Tom-bot, beta version 0.2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 I'll take "The Left STILL Doesn't Know Why Hillary Lost!" for $250 Alex. We do know why she lost you guys are just trying to ignore the obvious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 We do know why she lost you guys are just trying to ignore the obvious Why did she lose? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 Why did she lose? The FBI was the deciding factor. Take that out of the election and she wins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 The FBI was the deciding factor. Take that out of the election and she wins [This is an automated response.] You're an idiot. Created by DC Tom-bot, beta version 0.2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 SALENA ZITO: Why Hillary Clinton is still losing supporters. Audrey and Robert, a Virginia couple, were heading to Montana to visit their daughter, son-in-law and grandchildren; Edward of Lancaster, Pa., was traveling to see his mother and brothers and sisters in Fort Wayne, Ind. All had voted for Trump — and all had noticed the way they were still being portrayed by the losing side. “On Nov. 8 I went from a responsible, hard-working, upstanding citizen to an uninformed bigot who gleefully supports Russian interference in our elections and the destruction of our republic,” Robert said. “At least that’s what I have read in the newspaper or seen on television, so it must be true, right?” Edward smiled, paused, and then said, “It is refreshing to hear your candor, it’s gotten to the point where you are afraid to not only express your opinion, but to stand by your opinion. Yes, I supported him and yes, I would do it again.” “They’ve thrown everything at everyone who voted for Trump to deteriorate or place doubt in his supporters’ minds,” said Audrey. “ It astounds me that the press still doesn’t get it, that my party (Democrats) are blaming everyone but themselves for a poor message, poor messenger and the responsibility she bears for placing her email security in jeopardy . . . it’s not Comey’s fault. It’s hers,” said Elizabeth who was sitting in the booth across the aisle. Elizabeth voted for Clinton, but wasn’t sure she’d do so again. “The way everyone is acting now post-election shows that no one, no one, has learned anything. She is just proving she deserved to lose,” she said. Nobody likes a sore loser. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 The FBI was the deciding factor. Take that out of the election and she wins I'll take "The Left STILL Doesn't Know Why Hillary Lost" for $800 Alex. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 The FBI was the deciding factor. Take that out of the election and she wins So if she didn't illegally distribute classified information over an unsecure server with help of the wife of an alleged pedophile who sexts 15-year-old girls, she would have won? You may be onto something there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 So if she didn't illegally distribute classified information over an unsecure server with help of the wife of an alleged pedophile who sexts 15-year-old girls, she would have won? You may be onto something there. Are you going to hold your breath for an indictment? And the FBI investigated Weiner? You think they do that for every perv? No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 Are you going to hold your breath for an indictment? And the FBI investigated Weiner? You think they do that for every perv? No I'll take "The Left STILL Doesn't Know Why Hillary Lost" for $600 Alex. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 There likely isn't a case to be made for probably cause that every perv's laptop could have US Government classified documents inside. Hillary was loose with her security. Huma was derelict in passing along those emails, or letting her perv hubby use her laptop. Weiner had no right to be anywhere near those emails of Hillary and Huma. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 Are you going to hold your breath for an indictment? And the FBI investigated Weiner? You think they do that for every perv? No Are you suggesting that Obama sent his appointed FBI director after Hillary and Weiner? Why would Obama do that? Do you think he felt Bernie had a better chance to win? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 Are you suggesting that Obama sent his appointed FBI director after Hillary and Weiner? Why would Obama do that? Do you think he felt Bernie had a better chance to win? No, not suggesting that at all. The FBI director is independent for the most part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 And the FBI investigated Weiner? You think they do that for every perv? No Yeah, actually, they do. They have an entire department dedicated to it. It falls under their child porn & sexual exploitation mandates. You can look it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 There likely isn't a case to be made for probably cause that every perv's laptop could have US Government classified documents inside. Hillary was loose with her security. Huma was derelict in passing along those emails, or letting her perv hubby use her laptop. Weiner had no right to be anywhere near those emails of Hillary and Huma. You are putting cart in front of horse. They went looking into Weiner just to get at Clinton and found nothing. If you were texting a young girl--who you never met, btw--the FBI would not bother to seize all your devices. They would not care. But he was a POLITICAL target Yeah, actually, they do. They have an entire department dedicated to it. It falls under their child porn & sexual exploitation mandates. You can look it up. Ya sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 You are putting cart in front of horse. They went looking into Weiner just to get at Clinton and found nothing. If you were texting a young girl--who you never met, btw--the FBI would not bother to seize all your devices. They would not care. But he was a POLITICAL target They found nothing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 They found nothing? Hi, sorry, did not mean to ignore you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts