Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Such a classic response.

 

You have staked you claim to Ratcliffe. Own him!

 

In the meantime: almost every former advisor has excoriated him. 

 

That doesn’t bother you? It’s them that are the morons?

 

 

Edited by Thurmal34
  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
22 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

 

Mighty suspicious, isn't it?

3 things you need to know about him:

 

He's a POS

 

He lies

 

He's usually drunk

 

 

Posted
37 minutes ago, Thurmal34 said:

You have staked you claim to Ratcliffe. Own him!

 

In the meantime: almost every former advisor has excoriated him

 

Were those the same "former advisers" who failed to stop 9/11 and then used their failure to push fear and sell their mass surveillance agenda on the country through the Patriot Act? Were those the same "former advisers" who lied about WMD, and in turn cost this country thousands of lives, trillions of dollars, and further destabilized the entire ME -- emboldening Iran and the Saudis both (and their terror proxies)? Were those the same "former advisers" who perjured themselves before Congress and the nation in 2013 when they lied about mass surveillance and NSA collection of US data? Were those the same "former advisers" who pushed a now proven lie on the public in the form of Trump/Russia conspiracy/collusion in an attempt to subvert/invalidate an otherwise legal presidential election?

 

(checks notes)

 

Image result for clapper brennan comey

Image result for michael morell cia

Image result for michael hayden

 

 

... Yup. They sure are. 

 

So the question you should be asking is why do you, a rational and sober individual, blindly trust the very same people who have lied this country into debacle after debacle after debacle? 

 

 

Posted
9 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

So the question you should be asking is why do you, a rational and sober individual, blindly trust the very same people who have lied this country into debacle after debacle after debacle?

 

Because #OrangeManBad.

 

It even includes a hashtag, so it must be rational!

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I'm not sure if anyone posted this. 

 

Laura Loomer will run for Congress

 

https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/breaking-laura-loomer-files-to-run-for-congress/

 

The liberals don't like her one bit.

Posted
On 8/2/2019 at 10:54 PM, Thurmal34 said:

Praise the King, get a job.

 

Is Deranged on the rings, parallel bars, or horse for his latest mental gymnastics?

 

Tell us Deranged, tell us how this guy is in any way qualified to lead America’s intelligence apparatus. Lead it. 

 

 

Deranged should also be compelled to tell us why Ratcliffe is in any way qualified to be the goalie for the US Women's Soccer Team, host the Academy Awards, and/or work on Verizon's 5g cell towers.  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted


Trump nominates John Ratcliffe,  deep state goes bonkers, Ratcliffe withdraws.
Deep state floats Sue Gordon as as the new head of DNI.
Trump says, 'you wouldn't give me my guy, now your guy is gone too. Bub-bye Gordon.'
If they hadn't sunk the Ratcliffe nomination, Gordon would still be around for deep state. Now, she's gone for good.

BTW, if Schiffy liked her, makes me wonder if she was leaking to him?
 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Buffalo_Gal said:


Trump nominates John Ratcliffe,  deep state goes bonkers, Ratcliffe withdraws.
Deep state floats Sue Gordon as as the new head of DNI.
Trump says, 'you wouldn't give me my guy, now your guy is gone too. Bub-bye Gordon.'
If they hadn't sunk the Ratcliffe nomination, Gordon would still be around for deep state. Now, she's gone for good.

BTW, if Schiffy liked her, makes me wonder if she was leaking to him?
 

 

 

Same with Ignatius and Barrett -- both important journalists who started the ball rolling on the public smear, likely were getting drops from Gordon/Brennan's people.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
22 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

 

 

 

I'm guessing the media's reporting this is the end of democracy, the end of the world, and Trump is Hitler?

Posted
19 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

I'm guessing the media's reporting this is the end of democracy, the end of the world, and Trump is Hitler?

 

i would not want to work where I'm answering to Trump or one of his truckles

 

 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, DC Tom said:

 

I'm guessing the media's reporting this is the end of democracy, the end of the world, and Trump is Hitler?

 

 

 

 

Well.........................maybe not that bad..............................................................................................but Trump IS still Hitler

 

?

Posted
3 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

Well.........................maybe not that bad..............................................................................................but Trump IS still Hitler

 

?

 

only 5.5 years to go

 

Posted

In his first interview since resigning from office, former Defense Secretary Mattis appeared reluctant to directly criticize the president, but when he was asked about Trump’s tweets about North Korea he said: “Any Marine general or any other senior servant of the people of the United States would find that, to use a mild euphemism, counterproductive and beneath the dignity of the presidency.” Mattis appeared to explain his decision not to speak out more directly by saying: “I may not like a commander in chief one fricking bit, but our system puts the commander in chief there, and to further weaken him when we’re up against real threats—I mean, we could be at war on the Korean peninsula, every time they start launching something.” His aides reportedly told The Atlanticthat Mattis believes Trump has “limited cognitive ability,” and a “generally dubious character.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/mattis-on-trumps-tweets-beneath-the-dignity-of-the-presidency?ref=home

×
×
  • Create New...