Nanker Posted February 14, 2017 Posted February 14, 2017 Can you imagine how they'll behave when theTrumps stay in Washington after his administration is over and starts running a shadow government that funds anti-Democrat demonstrations with their extra campaign cash they haul in from their SuperPacs? B.O. is playing with fire.
Chef Jim Posted February 14, 2017 Posted February 14, 2017 Can you imagine how they'll behave when theTrumps stay in Washington after his administration is over and starts running a shadow government that funds anti-Democrat demonstrations with their extra campaign cash they haul in from their SuperPacs? B.O. is playing with fire.
Nanker Posted February 14, 2017 Posted February 14, 2017 It's only the Post, but that's a wee mite more legit than Breitbart these days. The story is out there.
Benjamin Franklin Posted February 14, 2017 Posted February 14, 2017 (edited) You stay classy, New York Times Has the New York Times finally gone too far? This is really just awful. 45] There are plenty of images NYT could have used for this headline that didnt involve Stephen Millers head on a spike. This is just in seriously bad taste, imagine if Breitbart or another more conservative outlet had posted an image of say Valerie Jarretts head on a spike. It's already been screen captured, so they might as well keep it up It's an image from Colbert that is part of the article. I had to go to the actual story before that came clear. The image is watermarked and and the story is all about the pillorying of Miller. Edited February 14, 2017 by Benjamin Franklin
IDBillzFan Posted February 14, 2017 Posted February 14, 2017 It's an image from Colbert that is part of the article. I had to go to the actual story before that came clear. The image is watermarked and and the story is all about the pillorying of Miller. Oh, well. Then that makes it completely acceptable. You can piss and moan about Trump all you want, but you're watching the left launch his re-election campaign in tremendous fashion.
B-Man Posted February 14, 2017 Posted February 14, 2017 (edited) It's an image from Colbert that is part of the article. I had to go to the actual story before that came clear. The image is watermarked and and the story is all about the pillorying of Miller. Ben...............Everyone is aware that it is an image from Colbert, However, as I posted, The New York Times DID use it in their tweet to publicize their story. The images in the article that you went to did not use that inappropriate picture did they ? http://nyti.ms/2lL9Oy4 No..........it's a screen shot from a video in the story. They CHOSE that to put in their tweet and it was a piss poor decision, that illustrates their hypocrisy as does your attempt to "apologize" for them. . Edited February 14, 2017 by B-Man
Benjamin Franklin Posted February 14, 2017 Posted February 14, 2017 Oh, well. Then that makes it completely acceptable. You can piss and moan about Trump all you want, but you're watching the left launch his re-election campaign in tremendous fashion. Trump won't be president in 5 or 2 years. I say this with the authority of someone who was wrong every step of the way on Trump. That said, yes: The media freak out and behavior is atrocious right now. Trump is surely s disaster but it's hard to find a source that is being rationally critical. (Thank you WSJ.)
reddogblitz Posted February 15, 2017 Posted February 15, 2017 (edited) It's only the Post, but that's a wee mite more legit than Breitbart these days. The story is out there. After Trump issued a temporary ban on immigration from seven terror-prone Muslim nations, the demonstrators jammed airports, chanting: No ban, no wall, sanctuary for all! I wonder how many of the protesters know 2,500,000 people were deported while Barack "Deporter in Chief" Obama was President. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/obamas-deportation-policy-numbers/story?id=41715661 Edited February 15, 2017 by reddogblitz
Nanker Posted February 15, 2017 Posted February 15, 2017 I remember a SNL skit about the revelation that Sarah Palin's daughter was pregnant and not married. The "NY Times reporter" asked, "is Palin's husband the father? After all they're from Alaska." Smug azzed liberals. They have no shame. Look at their leadership - Schumer, Warren, Franken, Pelosi, Waters, Hoyer. Despicable.
Nanker Posted February 15, 2017 Posted February 15, 2017 I'm all for this kind of "social justice". Enjoy:
mead107 Posted February 15, 2017 Posted February 15, 2017 The guy in the car had the right idea. Run over the azzholes
Gary M Posted February 15, 2017 Posted February 15, 2017 Trump is surely s disaster but it's hard to find a source that is being rationally critical. (Thank you WSJ.) So there is no real proof he is a disaster?
grinreaper Posted February 15, 2017 Posted February 15, 2017 I wonder how many of the protesters know 2,500,000 people were deported while Barack "Deporter in Chief" Obama was President. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/obamas-deportation-policy-numbers/story?id=41715661 That may or may not be true, but how many illegal aliens were allowed into this country? What are the net results?
Benjamin Franklin Posted February 15, 2017 Posted February 15, 2017 So there is no real proof he is a disaster? My name is Mike Flynn and I approve this message.
boyst Posted February 15, 2017 Posted February 15, 2017 My name is Mike Flynn and I approve this message.how is the mike Flynn narrative different than the bengahzi narrative?
Chef Jim Posted February 15, 2017 Posted February 15, 2017 My name is Mike Flynn and I approve this message. But didn't Trump ask for his resignation? I could imagine a Clinton Administration that would deny it to the ends of the world and keep the lie going. And then when it was proven to be a lie make the denigration of the source the narrative.
IDBillzFan Posted February 15, 2017 Posted February 15, 2017 how is the mike Flynn narrative different than the bengahzi narrative? Mike Flynn didn't spend weeks telling the country on every major news network that Benghazi was caused by a Youtube video?
Benjamin Franklin Posted February 15, 2017 Posted February 15, 2017 Agreed. He just hung the VP and others out to dry. I could imagine a Clinton Administration that would deny it to the ends of the world and keep the lie going. And then when it was proven to be a lie make the denigration of the source the narrative. Trump would never use these tactics.
reddogblitz Posted February 15, 2017 Posted February 15, 2017 That may or may not be true, but how many illegal aliens were allowed into this country? What are the net results? How may it not be true? I've read it in many places. My link was from CBS, hardly an Obama hatchet organization. If you got other facts, bring 'em. I don't understand your questions.
IDBillzFan Posted February 15, 2017 Posted February 15, 2017 How may it not be true? I've read it in many places. My link was from CBS, hardly an Obama hatchet organization. If you got other facts, bring 'em. I don't understand your questions. I'll have to find a link, but there was something of a big fudge in the way the Obama WH counted what it considered to be "deported." I don't remember the specifics right now, but it was somewhat along the line of imply/infer on which Obama spent years tight-rope walking, like, for example, his amazing reference to the number of jobs he "saved and created."
Recommended Posts