Thailog80 Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 So it's better to fumble and lose the game, then to throw and interception. Gotcha, I was trying to figure out what exactly the problem was. 252210[/snapback] Drew always finds a way to muck up the BIG game does he not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Drew always finds a way to muck up the BIG game does he not? 252213[/snapback] Bills/Patriots, 31-0. Unless of course by "big games" you mean "games he lost." In which case, you are correct, he's never won a big game. I hate when people use the words "always" and "never." I also hate how nobody ever defines "big game." CW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailog80 Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Bills/Patriots, 31-0. Unless of course by "big games" you mean "games he lost." In which case, you are correct, he's never won a big game. I hate when people use the words "always" and "never." I also hate how nobody ever defines "big game." CW 252219[/snapback] Okay SB 31. Drew was stellar in that BIG GAME wasn't he? Which Bills / Pats 31-0 game of that season are you referring to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Okay SB 31. Drew was stellar in that BIG GAME wasn't he? 252221[/snapback] Okay, in the game for NE against Pitt where he came off the bench. Not a great performance but he got the job done. Oh and he got a ring 2 weeks later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Okay, in the game for NE against Pitt where he came off the bench. Not a great performance but he got the job done. Oh and he got a ring 2 weeks later. 252223[/snapback] But Brady got the start, ergo it was Brady's big game and Brady's win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Okay SB 31. Drew was stellar in that BIG GAME wasn't he? Which Bills / Pats 31-0 game of that season are you referring to? 252221[/snapback] Ok, so only Superbowls are "BIG GAMES?" In that case, Bledsoe is 0-1 in big games? I'm talking about week 1, 2003, vs the Patriots. Week 17 (the "other" 31-0 game) was a nothing game with no implications on standings at all. CW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailog80 Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Ok, so only Superbowls are "BIG GAMES?" In that case, Bledsoe is 0-1 in big games? I'm talking about week 1, 2003, vs the Patriots. Week 17 (the "other" 31-0 game) was a nothing game with no implications on standings at all. CW 252228[/snapback] 23-25 in "big games"......good enough? 86-85 in his pro career in "big games" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 23-25 in "big games"......good enough? 252230[/snapback] 9-2 with a real running back behind him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailog80 Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 9-2 with a real running back behind him. 252232[/snapback] That's a howler. Drew had some decent games but he hardly shouldered us to victories. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 23-25 in "big games"......good enough? 86-85 in his pro career in "big games" 252230[/snapback] How does he do in the little games? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailog80 Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 How does he do in the little games? 252239[/snapback] He sucks BIG Time also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 That's a howler. Drew had some decent games but he hardly shouldered us to victories. 252236[/snapback] You can't have it both ways. You want to blame him for a losing record, but when you give him the tools he is has an outstanding record. Which is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailog80 Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 You can't have it both ways. You want to blame him for a losing record, but when you give him the tools he is has an outstanding record. Which is it? 252244[/snapback] You really want to give Drew Bledsoe credit for the ST and D's wins? Okay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 You really want to give Drew Bledsoe credit for the ST and D's wins? Okay. 252248[/snapback] And of course Drew was responsible for Travis fumbling and having Denver running it back last year? Or Travis tripping of the yard lines in the first 4 games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailog80 Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 And of course Drew was responsible for Travis fumbling and having Denver running it back last year? Or Travis tripping of the yard lines in the first 4 games. 252250[/snapback] No Drew didn't make that happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 You really want to give Drew Bledsoe credit for the ST and D's wins? Okay. 252248[/snapback] Well you're giving him the blame for ST and D losses (ie: Jacksonville's last scoring drive, the Jets' last scoring drive). CW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 And of course Drew was responsible for Travis fumbling and having Denver running it back last year? He was responsible for Moulds' fumble on the 5 yard line against the Jags as well. Damn him. CW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickey Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 I cannot for the life of me imagine why some on this board continue to defend DB and say that his treatment was unfair. FACT: DB was offered a position to be our back up next year. He "can't see himself being a backup in this league" so he asked for his release. TD and MM released him as soon as possible, per DB's wishes, to give him the best chance to land on his feet somewhere else. As we know, Dallas is the latest sucker. Why keep him around next year and tell him that it'll be an open competition? Clearly, the decision was made to go with JP, so telling DB it would've been an open competition would have been lying to him. The decision was made because the front office and coaching staff feel it is in the best interests of this team. Why is that so horrible and such bad treatment of DB? What we do know is that DB wasn't taking us anywhere. That was proven over his career in New England (no championships with him as starter, three since!) and here (no playoff appearances, consistent poor play in big games and against top teams.) What we don't know is what JP is capable of. 252093[/snapback] Yeah, that Parcells is a moron. Not nearly as smart as Tom Donahoe. Parcells only got Drew Bledsoe for free while we paid a first round pick for him. Sucka. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 this thread takes asinine to new levels....is there such a thing as asiten? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 this thread takes asinine to new levels....is there such a thing as asiten? 252318[/snapback] Dude, this thread goes to eleven. Nice sentiment, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts