prissythecat Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 It's a big silly but as much as some of you don't want to admit it, EJ is almost the same as a passer as Tyrod. The turnovers is the major difference but EJ actually will attend passes over the middle. I hope Tyrod shows franchise type skills before the end of the year. But I wonder what their careers would be like if EJ got to sit behind Flacco and Tyrod had to play right away. Quite a few gems in this post. Just objectively looking at passing stats shows that EJ is several notches below Tyrod in terms of passer rating, ypa, completion percentage. Tyrod CMP ATT YDS CMP% AVG TD LNG INT FUM QBR RAT Career 377 607 4,531 62.1 7.47 29 84 10 12 - 94.0 EJ CMP ATT YDS CMP% AVG TD LNG INT FUM QBR RAT Career 309 524 3,381 59.0 6.45 19 80 15 10 - 78.3 And to say that EJ would magically lose the deer in headlights look , pocket unawareness , and inaccuracy issues he has had since FSU days just because he rides the pine behind Flacco is absurd.
C.Biscuit97 Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 Quite a few gems in this post. Just objectively looking at passing stats shows that EJ is several notches below Tyrod in terms of passer rating, ypa, completion percentage. Tyrod CMP ATT YDS CMP% AVG TD LNG INT FUM QBR RAT Career 377 607 4,531 62.1 7.47 29 84 10 12 - 94.0 EJ CMP ATT YDS CMP% AVG TD LNG INT FUM QBR RAT Career 309 524 3,381 59.0 6.45 19 80 15 10 - 78.3 And to say that EJ would magically lose the deer in headlights look , pocket unawareness , and inaccuracy issues he has had since FSU days just because he rides the pine behind Flacco is absurd. Saying a qb won't behind from playing on a SB team instead of for Marrone/ Hackett is hardly a leap. Tyrod protects the ball mich better so he deserves to be a starter. But he has similar flaws to EJ as a passer and avoids passing in tight windows.
MAJBobby Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 The truth to the matter is we have probably two very good BU or low end starters
PromoTheRobot Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 The notion isn't as silly as some are making it out to be. Manuel has factually let game winning drives and comebacks for the team. Taylor has been terrible at it. With that said, this isn't baseball. I think quarterbacks need time to get into the flow of games to be able to more quickly read what defenses are giving up and what they're not. I can't fathom a situation where you would play a guy up until 5 minutes left in the game and then bring in a new QB to try to win the game when you're down by a score. It's a novel concept none the less. The weird thing about EJ is he actually gets better in crunch time...after blowing the rest of the game. My question is can he perform coming off the bench or does he need to get all the bad plays out of his system first before playing well?
Hanoverbills Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 I was laughing when EJ came in for a brief spell this year. The only pass he threw was straight into tight triple coverage that should have been picked. I was laughing to,when TT line up behind the guard. That was funny. Saying a qb won't behind from playing on a SB team instead of for Marrone/ Hackett is hardly a leap. Tyrod protects the ball mich better so he deserves to be a starter. But he has similar flaws to EJ as a passer and avoids passing in tight windows. Plus one guy had two more years of nfl coaching than the other.
CardinalScotts Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 Let Tyrod get more games under his belt..we are at 22 with this team...30 will be a good number to look at
Jobot Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 Kind of an out of the box idea, but what if we made EJ the closer. Where he comes in at the end of the 4th to pull out games. In his second game he had led a come from behind TD drive against the Panthers and should of had another one against the Falcons. Tyrod can do alot of things, one of them isn't putting the team on his back and pulling out a victory in the 4th, he's not that kind of QB. HAHAHAHA He had 1 comeback win and should of had another??? What are you thinking!?!?!! LOFL
bobobonators Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 Nice try though completion % doesn't mean Accuracy I know EJ had more Turnovers. However a turnover can be the result of a Bad pass, a tipped ball that the WR dropped. I was talking accuracy and found it interesting that TT and EJ have every similar Bad Pass numbers Hence interesting stat of the day You know what I've noticed with you? Every single positive attribute that is given to you about TT you always come back with some wingbat "but sometimes" statement. When you are unwilling to see any positive in a QB that our front office and other coaches around the NFL see good things in, it tells me you're so far out in left field with your views that i simply cant take you seriously.
jaybee Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 (edited) Sal Maiorano was saying earlier this week that in the 4th qtr when the Bills are within one score of taking the lead; that Tyrod has a 40% completion rate and a QB rating of 50. I dont know about EJ (he might be OK) but Tyrod has been unable to light it up when the teams back is against the wall. It likely isnt exclusively his fault. Play calling, route running, injuries etc. They all play a role. The problem with the OP's idea is there is only so much practice time and these 2 QB's splitting reps with the #1's would likely dilute their readiness for each opponent. Additionally, you also take the risk of creating controversy, locker room taking sides and a media that will throw nitrous on the fire. But, I wont pile on....... even though its the in-thing to do on this forum. The OP is simply asking a question. Nothing wrong with that. EDIT: very much agree with the quote below..I hate to say..... MAJbobby ... The truth to the matter is we have probably two very good BU or low end starters Edited October 27, 2016 by jaybee
BringBackOrton Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 The only thing EJ will be closing is his chain of lucrative Popeye's franchises.
Maddog69 Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 Kind of an out of the box idea, but what if we made EJ the closer. Where he comes in at the end of the 4th to pull out games. In his second game he had led a come from behind TD drive against the Panthers and should of had another one against the Falcons. Tyrod can do alot of things, one of them isn't putting the team on his back and pulling out a victory in the 4th, he's not that kind of QB.I like the out of the box thinking. And I think there are some cases where they already do this in a limited capacity. I would not mind seeing a little more. That said, Tyrod either needs to develop into the closer that we need or they need to find a better answer at the position. I don't think EJ is that answer and I am quickly getting to the point of accepting that Tyrod is not either.
bigK14094 Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 I think TT has all the makings of a closer. He can run when the chips are down.....more than he runs normally. I was extremely disappointed in the Dolphins game in the fourth qtr when they ran the wildcat from the 20 yard line on first and 10. Mike G loses 10 yards, and TT is back under center 2 and 20. They need to FIND out about TT, they certainly didn't put the ball in his hands that series. Lynn still a rookie OC, and it showed on that series. At 2nd and 20, TT was already in trouble.
QB Bills Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 (edited) Kind of an out of the box idea, but what if we made EJ the closer. Where he comes in at the end of the 4th to pull out games. In his second game he had led a come from behind TD drive against the Panthers and should of had another one against the Falcons. Tyrod can do alot of things, one of them isn't putting the team on his back and pulling out a victory in the 4th, he's not that kind of QB. I suggest you re-watch that last drive against the Panthers. His completions were dumpoffs (mostly to Freddie, one of which he had to purposely drop to stop the clock) and the blown coverage lob to Stevie who was wide open, but would never have been successful if he was covered. He also threw an unnecessary bullet at CJ who was less than ten yards in front of him that bounced right off him and should have been picked. He had a decent scramble on the penultimate play of that drive. Other than that, he sucked. And has always sucked. And likely always will. Fred Jackson won that game for the Bills, not EJ. Edited October 27, 2016 by QB Bills
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 There's an old phrase if you have 2 QBs you have none
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 (edited) You know what I've noticed with you? Every single positive attribute that is given to you about TT you always come back with some wingbat "but sometimes" statement. When you are unwilling to see any positive in a QB that our front office and other coaches around the NFL see good things in, it tells me you're so far out in left field with your views that i simply cant take you seriously. Bob: I think the issue is that the things that Taylor does well: turning broken plays into gains, passing outside of the pocket, protecting the ball with conservative throws, and having top end big play ability; aren't conducive to long sustained drives, and that's largely because when Taylor is forced to be a pocket passer, which is typical on ever NFL drive in 2nd and 3rd and long situations, he struggles to convert. The necessary skills for that just aren't in his tool belt. So in games like the Miami game, where the defense is getting warn down, and/or struggling, and the offense needs to keep them off the field, they can't. It's the exact same reason he struggles in late/clutch situations. So it's not so much that what he does well isn't being acknowledged, they are. No one here would dare say that Taylor isn't dangerous with his legs, and doesn't have elite big play ability. It's that the things he does well really don't matter much when the chips are down. Tyrod may well be the very best screwdriver in the world, that doesn't matter one bit when someone needs to drive a nail. Edited October 27, 2016 by TakeYouToTasker
Hanoverbills Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 Quite a few gems in this post. Just objectively looking at passing stats shows that EJ is several notches below Tyrod in terms of passer rating, ypa, completion percentage. Tyrod CMP ATT YDS CMP% AVG TD LNG INT FUM QBR RAT Career 377 607 4,531 62.1 7.47 29 84 10 12 - 94.0 EJ CMP ATT YDS CMP% AVG TD LNG INT FUM QBR RAT Career 309 524 3,381 59.0 6.45 19 80 15 10 - 78.3 And to say that EJ would magically lose the deer in headlights look , pocket unawareness , and inaccuracy issues he has had since FSU days just because he rides the pine behind Flacco is absurd. This year TT has a 60.4 comp% and 6.8 avg. Not to much better than EJ. career. Sounds like inaccuracy issues. Jamie Winston who is from FSU 58.8 career comp%. Inaccuracy issues. Ej Has A 3.6 Td% and 2.9 int% and Jamie Winston 4.4 td% and 3.1 int%.
flaz Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 "should of had" "stupider" Dumbest post with some with dumber language
fridge Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 "should of had" "stupider" Dumbest post with some with dumber language
Recommended Posts