4merper4mer Posted October 21, 2016 Posted October 21, 2016 When combined with the relatively new 2 point conversion, the long extra point seems weird to me. Under the old system, you could fake an extra point and go for 2. You can still do that but realistically it is too far. It takes a little something away. But here's the thing....a lot of long XP's get missed. If you want the 1 point, why not just fake a 2 point conversion and kick from short instead?
scribo Posted October 21, 2016 Posted October 21, 2016 Because that's now it works. That's not how any of this works. If you elect to go for one, you have to go for one. If you go for two, you have to go for two. Faking it isn't allowed on either type of XP try under the present-day rules.
MAJBobby Posted October 21, 2016 Posted October 21, 2016 Just go for 2 everytime you will come out ahead in the long run
mannc Posted October 21, 2016 Posted October 21, 2016 Just go for 2 everytime you will come out ahead in the long runTrue, but no NFL coach (other than Tomlin, and maybe Belichick) has the balls to do it.
CSBill Posted October 21, 2016 Posted October 21, 2016 Or how about never punting? Like the HS coach in Arkansas: http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2669417-meet-kevin-kelley-the-coach-who-never-punts
4merper4mer Posted October 21, 2016 Author Posted October 21, 2016 Or how about never punting? Like the HS coach in Arkansas: http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2669417-meet-kevin-kelley-the-coach-who-never-punts This thing and the always go for two thing are valid points and interesting arguments, but this thread isn't really about that. I'm just saying make the 1 pointer easier by faking a 2 pointer so it would be a shorter kick. The other way, faking a 1 pointer and going for two, is unrealistic because of the distance but it would certainly add the element of surprise.
Nanker Posted October 21, 2016 Posted October 21, 2016 What are these "extra" points, and how can The Bills get their "fair share" of them?
GunnerBill Posted October 21, 2016 Posted October 21, 2016 I'm just saying make the 1 pointer easier by faking a 2 pointer so it would be a shorter kick. The other way, faking a 1 pointer and going for two, is unrealistic because of the distance but it would certainly add the element of surprise. And which bit of the "isn't allowed in today's rules" didn't you get?
JM57 Posted October 21, 2016 Posted October 21, 2016 And which bit of the "isn't allowed in today's rules" didn't you get? Don't feed the trolls
4merper4mer Posted October 21, 2016 Author Posted October 21, 2016 And which bit of the "isn't allowed in today's rules" didn't you get? Makes no sense. What are they going to do? Call illegal formation? Even if they do, take the 5 yards. The kick is still shorter. If NE had Carpenter you know this would have already happened.
Nanker Posted October 21, 2016 Posted October 21, 2016 But that's not my point. For example The Bills beat the hapless GoldDiggers by 40 point or so. That was WAAAAY more than what they needed to win the game. Why can't we save some of them for use in other games when we need to score more to get a win? That makes a lot more cents to me.
scribo Posted October 21, 2016 Posted October 21, 2016 I was mistaken in part of my answer earlier in this thread. It is legal to fake a 1-point try and attempt to score two points. But it is indeed illegal to start at the 3-yard line and attempt to kick for 1 point.
GunnerBill Posted October 21, 2016 Posted October 21, 2016 Makes no sense. What are they going to do? Call illegal formation? Even if they do, take the 5 yards. The kick is still shorter. If NE had Carpenter you know this would have already happened. They will simply rule the 2 point conversion "no good". If you are attempting a 2 point conversion you must get the ball in the endzone. Kicking it through the uprights does not do that. Therefore the conversion is no good.
Gugny Posted October 21, 2016 Posted October 21, 2016 They will simply rule the 2 point conversion "no good". If you are attempting a 2 point conversion you must get the ball in the endzone. Kicking it through the uprights does not do that. Therefore the conversion is no good. How do you figure? The ball crosses the goal line, either way.
thebandit27 Posted October 21, 2016 Posted October 21, 2016 OP is easily my favorite poster since crayonz
GunnerBill Posted October 21, 2016 Posted October 21, 2016 How do you figure? The ball crosses the goal line, either way. Without established possession.
4merper4mer Posted October 21, 2016 Author Posted October 21, 2016 They will simply rule the 2 point conversion "no good". If you are attempting a 2 point conversion you must get the ball in the endzone. Kicking it through the uprights does not do that. Therefore the conversion is no good. OK right. Like when they stopped NE from using those the illegal substitutions against Baltimore? That's never gonna happen.
Recommended Posts