26CornerBlitz Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 What happened to the Josh Gordon rhetoric??? Up in smoke! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wiz Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 I would love Marshall but would take a king's ransom at this point with decker out for forever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 I would love Marshall but would take a king's ransom at this point with decker out for forever.I don't think so. They have Revis that's done, Marshall in his low 30's, Forte in his low 30's and no QB. They are about to hit the reset button. They'd take a mid round pick IMO (like a 4th). I just don't see them trading him within the division. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scribo Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 You don't make a trade for a player at this point in the season unless you really believe that player can provide a legit improvement in our chances of at least making the playoffs. I am not sure there is a such a need, at this precise moment, other than maybe at WR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew in CA Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 You don't make a trade for a player at this point in the season unless you really believe that player can provide a legit improvement in our chances of at least making the playoffs. I am not sure there is a such a need, at this precise moment, other than maybe at WR. Right -- and who is available at WR? Marshall? Doubt Jets trade intra-division. Jeffrey? Maybe if the Bears are going for the tank, since he's they're only offensive weapon. This isn't baseball -- trades so rarely happen, I just don't see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADOLBILZ Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 I'd be happy with Marshall AND Watkins. Remember , that was the plan at OBD. The Jets ended up getting Marshall because their 4th rounder was higher than Buffalo's . We traded the higher of our fourth rounder in Cassell trade days earlier Specifically......the Bills had two fifth round picks going into the offseason but traded the first one, the 137th overall pick, to Minnesota for Cassel. Then when Marshall became available the Jets had pick 142 and the Bills 155...........the Bills were in on Marshall but the Jets had the higher pick. Then after the Jets got Marshall the Bills settled on the guy the Jets let go, Percy Harvin. Yeah...........Brandon Marshall would be a great pickup on the cheap. I don't think so. They have Revis that's done, Marshall in his low 30's, Forte in his low 30's and no QB. They are about to hit the reset button. They'd take a mid round pick IMO (like a 4th). I just don't see them trading him within the division. You are right they have a lot of old players under contract. I thought they kinda' half stepped this offseason..... and now they are in a bad place. They also have some pretty promising young WR though so if the Jets lose again this weekend it wouldn't surprise me if they dealt Marshall. To Buffalo? Probably not, but not out of the realm of possibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ganesh Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 He just had a huge game with mariota. That team just has a Mularkey problem. And they are 4-2 in a weak division...How is it a Mularkey problem. I think Mularkey is turning that program around. Yeah...........Brandon Marshall would be a great pickup on the cheap. Marshall signed a 3 year 26M contract. He is owed 9.5M this year and 7.5M next year. If the Bills can find cap space for 4.75M this year and 7.5M next year, then a trade makes sense...but it will not be cheap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 And they are 4-2 in a weak division...How is it a Mularkey problem. I think Mularkey is turning that program around. They are 3-3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts