Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Is that what most of the guys in the late teens of a year ranking are doing? He's essentially the lowest paid guy expected to start that's not on a rookie deal

 

He won't be after this season if the extension kicks in. What's the point if he can't perform?

  • Replies 206
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

As a side note, welcome to the board!! I know that you haven't been here long but you have turned out a lot of solid contributions already. I really look forward to what you are going to bring.

Well I must be a turd sandwhich because i don't remember getting this warm welcome :D

Posted

What I believe we are seeing is the very same QB the team had last year only this preseason didn't have much playing time to work off the rust and get his timing down with his receiving corps.

 

The Ravens shut down the run game and made the QB win the game and the Jets followed with the same thing. The difference is that with more playing time Tyrod made some things happen against the Jets despite no strong run game again.

 

Should the Bills OC get the run game working then I suspect we will see a better offense and conversely, if it stalls again it will be placed on the QB's shoulders to win the game. Forcing the QB to throw to Watkins and downfield more often just might have him emerge as a star and OTOH it just might ruin his career by killing his confidence.

 

Some fans are already towing the company line that Greg Roman deserved to be fired because of the failure to develop Tyrod to be better at reading defenses and better downfield throwing over the middle. Also, he had a tendency to wait until he saw the receiver open rather than trusting his receiver to be at a preconceived spot on the field. These fans need to remember that this is a 6th round draft pick that needs time to develop and that process usually takes years.

Posted (edited)

Ok I posted 5 passing Charts.

 

Taylors

 

Wintsons

Bridgewaters

Bradfords

Fitzs

 

So what is the key takeaway. The graphic representation of the major hole in Tyrods play. Look at the distribution between the numbers and 10+ yards.

 

Now you will see why it is easy to play defense against him.


What I believe we are seeing is the very same QB the team had last year only this preseason didn't have much playing time to work off the rust and get his timing down with his receiving corps.

 

The Ravens shut down the run game and made the QB win the game and the Jets followed with the same thing. The difference is that with more playing time Tyrod made some things happen against the Jets despite no strong run game again.

 

Should the Bills OC get the run game working then I suspect we will see a better offense and conversely, if it stalls again it will be placed on the QB's shoulders to win the game. Forcing the QB to throw to Watkins and downfield more often just might have him emerge as a star and OTOH it just might ruin his career by killing his confidence.

 

Some fans are already towing the company line that Greg Roman deserved to be fired because of the failure to develop Tyrod to be better at reading defenses and better downfield throwing over the middle. Also, he had a tendency to wait until he saw the receiver open rather than trusting his receiver to be at a preconceived spot on the field. These fans need to remember that this is a 6th round draft pick that needs time to develop and that process usually takes years.

5 years in the NFL.... due 27M at the end of the season. Tells me that I should see some progression. I don't see any meaning he is likely at his ceiling and if that is the case then time to move on because he isn't good enough

Edited by MAJBobby
Posted

Ok I posted 5 passing Charts.

 

Taylors

 

Wintsons

Bridgewaters

Bradfords

Fitzs

 

So what is the key takeaway. The graphic representation of the major hole in Tyrods play. Look at the distribution between the numbers and 10+ yards.

 

Now you will see why it is easy to play defense against him.

To take it a step further it makes it even easier if he is just standing in the pocket. You cant take away his biggest weapons (his legs and improvisational skills).

Posted (edited)

To take it a step further it makes it even easier if he is just standing in the pocket. You cant take away his biggest weapons (his legs and improvisational skills).

 

he had them last year.... Guess what happened still ignored the middle of the field. Now because teams can ignore that area of the field they spy him. Like the Jets did, Like the Ravens Did. So are the Bills taking his legs away or are the other teams.

 

I venture to say it is the other teams Just like Giants and NE did last year.

 

At end of Day if he cannot win from the pocket and use the entire field he needs to go. I am not paying 27M to a QB that is extremely limited.

Edited by MAJBobby
Posted

I am curious to hear thoughts on the topic of whether tyrod has actually regressed as a passer, or if our perceptions changed

 

Stat wise...

Last year: 63.7% completions, with 8.0 YPA, TDs on 5.3% of throws, INTs on 1.6%... 216 YPG

This year: 63.5% completions, with 7.8 YPA, TDs on 5.8% of throws, INTs on 1.9%... 204 YPG

 

2015 QB Rating 99.4, 2016 QB Rating 98.9

 

2015 QBR 67.8, 2016 QBR 62.5

 

2015 Sack 8.3%, 2016 Sacks 3.7%

 

Strengths -- Deep boundary throws, chunk yardage when plays break down

Weaknesses -- over the middle throws/reads, pocket presence, pre snap work

 

Are we seeing a very similar performance out of the guy (tack on an extra completion or two, and an extra sack or two, and the stats would be near the same), but due to the game outcomes and raised expectations viewing him differently?

 

A big difference is what we're NOT getting on offense so far. Overall, last year, we averaged just over 150 yds rushing per game. In the first 3 games, we were 147,160,151 yds rushing. Only 2 games with <100 yds rushing.

The 4th game, a loss to the Giants, only 55 yds rushing and the higher passing yardage couldn't make up for it.

 

This year, so far, 65 and 86 yards rushing.

 

We could afford for Tyrod to take time to develop in the passing game because we were getting the equivalent of 7 or 8 more 1st downs in our rushing game.

 

This year, teams are dedicated to stuffing the run and stuffing Tyrod if he runs, so it's pass or choke.

 

Also, the biggest difference is to what we saw at the end of the year, not averaged over the whole year. Taylor seemed to be throwing over the middle more comfortably, and also finding Sammy to target - Sammy had 10 or more targets in 6 of the last 8 games. So it looked like positive development and from that we regressed.

Posted

To take it a step further it makes it even easier if he is just standing in the pocket. You cant take away his biggest weapons (his legs and improvisational skills).

"Just make him be a quarterback."

 

Perhaps THE single most telling scouting report in history.

Posted

Tyrod posted a 112 QB rating the last game, a game in which he didn't reach the red zone until the end of the 4th quarter. That should tell you what a mirage QB stats are.

I guess that's true if you do not count the first two touchdowns.

Posted (edited)

 

He won't be after this season if the extension kicks in. What's the point if he can't perform?

next year the cash outlay would be high but he would still be among the cheapest in the league over a longer length than the single year.

 

if we keep him past this season, its essentially keeping him on the roster like 2 more years as more or less guaranteed, but still as a cheap starter.

 

i guess my point in mentioning that is that IF he starts using his legs some and is still boom or bust as a passer -- that might be preferred to starting over altogether. kind of like fitz being paid as the 19th best starter wasnt a terrible contract and we wouldve been fine sticking with him another year instead of kolb.

Edited by NoSaint
Posted

I am curious to hear thoughts on the topic of whether tyrod has actually regressed as a passer, or if our perceptions changed

 

Stat wise...

Last year: 63.7% completions, with 8.0 YPA, TDs on 5.3% of throws, INTs on 1.6%... 216 YPG

This year: 63.5% completions, with 7.8 YPA, TDs on 5.8% of throws, INTs on 1.9%... 204 YPG

 

2015 QB Rating 99.4, 2016 QB Rating 98.9

 

2015 QBR 67.8, 2016 QBR 62.5

 

2015 Sack 8.3%, 2016 Sacks 3.7%

 

Strengths -- Deep boundary throws, chunk yardage when plays break down

Weaknesses -- over the middle throws/reads, pocket presence, pre snap work

 

Are we seeing a very similar performance out of the guy (tack on an extra completion or two, and an extra sack or two, and the stats would be near the same), but due to the game outcomes and raised expectations viewing him differently?

 

I think he's the same guy...I think Defenses are going to continue to get better vs him unless Tyrod can prove he can do what they don't think he can do...Especially on 3rd down...

 

IMHO Tyrod is not unlike many of the QB's we've seen in here before in the area of actually processing what he sees and beating Defenses...The difference with Tyrod is, when he sees it he does have some success, and he's the best scrambling QB we've seen here since Flutie...Tyrod can make things happen when he scrambles, and that may actually give the false impression that he's better than he really is...

 

I think it's pretty simple...TT either learns how to burn Defenses by processing better, or he's not here next year...And I'm not optimistic...I think his lack of ability to speed thing up when needed is telling...I just don't believe the guy thinks the game fast enough to be a high level QB in the NFL...But in his defense not many do... B-)

Posted

next year the cash outlay would be high but he would still be among the cheapest in the league.

 

if we keep him past this season, its essentially keeping him on the roster like 2 more years as more or less guaranteed, but still as a cheap starter.

 

i guess my point in mentioning that is that IF he starts using his legs some and is still boom or bust as a passer -- that might be preferred to starting over altogether. kind of like fitz being paid as the 19th best starter wasnt a terrible contract and we wouldve been fine sticking with him another year instead of kolb.

 

I don't believe that kind of performance will lead to winning football.

Posted

next year the cash outlay would be high but he would still be among the cheapest in the league over a longer length than the single year.

 

if we keep him past this season, its essentially keeping him on the roster like 2 more years as more or less guaranteed, but still as a cheap starter.

 

i guess my point in mentioning that is that IF he starts using his legs some and is still boom or bust as a passer -- that might be preferred to starting over altogether. kind of like fitz being paid as the 19th best starter wasnt a terrible contract and we wouldve been fine sticking with him another year instead of kolb.

 

Unless he starts doing basic QB stuff i am not wanting a 15m cap hit RB that hits occasional big pass on the roster.

Posted

I am curious to hear thoughts on the topic of whether tyrod has actually regressed as a passer, or if our perceptions changed

Stat wise...

Last year: 63.7% completions, with 8.0 YPA, TDs on 5.3% of throws, INTs on 1.6%... 216 YPG

This year: 63.5% completions, with 7.8 YPA, TDs on 5.8% of throws, INTs on 1.9%... 204 YPG

2015 QB Rating 99.4, 2016 QB Rating 98.9

2015 QBR 67.8, 2016 QBR 62.5

2015 Sack 8.3%, 2016 Sacks 3.7%

Strengths -- Deep boundary throws, chunk yardage when plays break down

Weaknesses -- over the middle throws/reads, pocket presence, pre snap work

Are we seeing a very similar performance out of the guy (tack on an extra completion or two, and an extra sack or two, and the stats would be near the same), but due to the game outcomes and raised expectations viewing him differently?

It may not be a regression , but it's certainly a lack of progress. He doesn't appear to have improved at what he struggled with last season. Most fans gave him a pass with the expectation he would improve after a year as the starter. It's not just the outcomes of the games, but just how the offense looked with him running it. He made many errant throws, curious decisions , and just flat out missed reads. TT hasn't looked sharp. There are raised expectations because he went into this year as the unquestioned QB, getting all the reps, and having an entire offseason to better his skill set. If you aren't progressing, you are falling behind as every DC on your schedule has been scheming ways to defend you.

Posted

Oooo and another thing for those complaining about the shotgun all the time.

 

That is another limitation brought on by Taylor. He has to be in shotgun to be able tonsee over the line post snap.

Posted

 

he had them last year.... Guess what happened still ignored the middle of the field. Now because teams can ignore that area of the field they spy him. Like the Jets did, Like the Ravens Did. So are the Bills taking his legs away or are the other teams.

 

I venture to say it is the other teams Just like Giants and NE did last year.

 

At end of Day if he cannot win from the pocket and use the entire field he needs to go. I am not paying 27M to a QB that is extremely limited.

The answer is a little bit of both. One of the things that the Bills want out of Anthony Lynn are more designed roll outs and some zone read action. Both have been absent from the playbook through 2 weeks. You have to try to do what you do best and make teams stop you.

 

He may not ever be great at using the whole field. If they are playing to his strengths though you should see him having an easier time making plays in the middle of the field. It is also, a little chicken and egg. What is because of the play call and what is his lack of vision? We will start to find out more now that Roman is gone. Again, I would suspect that it is a little of both.

×
×
  • Create New...