bobobonators Posted December 15, 2016 Posted December 15, 2016 (edited) Luck, Brees, Rivers & Rodgers are proof positive the "all you need is a QB" mantra has set sail. All of their teams have major deficiencies defensively or in the run game. With the league skewing younger and younger, getting into shootouts weekly is not a sustainable model for success, the teams that have won over the last couple years protect the ball, run it down your throat (or in NE's case, have a short passing game that doubles as a running game) and turn you over defensively. Our defense is the real culprit this year, outside of the Baltimore game we've won every time we kept the opponent at 21 points or less and lost every time we've given up more points. Lets not forget about Matt Ryan throwing for 250-350 on a weekly basis and his team doing diddly squat the majority of his career. Sure looks good though. Edited December 15, 2016 by bobobonators
4merper4mer Posted December 15, 2016 Author Posted December 15, 2016 This thread is pure garbage. The op goes silent when Luck wins and comes out when Luck loses. If the Bills had Andrew Luck at qb this season they would be amazing and in the playoffs. Are you stoned again? Because it sounds like you're stoned again. When Luck wins? Is that the week he plays the Jags? Because the Titans and Watt-less Texans have passed him by. It has been said over and over again that all you need is a QB. Why aren't the Colts winning. He is more the QB for the Cults than he is for the Colts. Enjoy the hero worship.
What a Tuel Posted December 15, 2016 Posted December 15, 2016 Are you stoned again? Because it sounds like you're stoned again. When Luck wins? Is that the week he plays the Jags? Because the Titans and Watt-less Texans have passed him by. It has been said over and over again that all you need is a QB. Why aren't the Colts winning. He is more the QB for the Cults than he is for the Colts. Enjoy the hero worship. I think most people would say you can't win without a QB, not that all you need is a QB.
MDH Posted December 15, 2016 Posted December 15, 2016 It has been said over and over again that all you need is a QB. The only person who I've seen that has said anything close to this is you. So I suppose it has been said over and over again. Everybody else has been saying that the rest of the Colts suck. For some reason you see that as an "excuse" instead of a genuine reason. I'm assuming it's because you believe "all you need is a QB." But hey, don't let logic get in the way of a good crusade.
Maury Ballstein Posted December 15, 2016 Posted December 15, 2016 Are you stoned again? Because it sounds like you're stoned again. When Luck wins? Is that the week he plays the Jags? Because the Titans and Watt-less Texans have passed him by. It has been said over and over again that all you need is a QB. Why aren't the Colts winning. He is more the QB for the Cults than he is for the Colts. Enjoy the hero worship. Go to NFL.com. They show things there that will make you appear like less of a dunce/troll.
4merper4mer Posted December 15, 2016 Author Posted December 15, 2016 Go to NFL.com. They show things there that will make you appear like less of a dunce/troll. None of those things involve Andrew Luck winning do they?
Maury Ballstein Posted December 15, 2016 Posted December 15, 2016 None of those things involve Andrew Luck winning do they? 9/25 10/9 10/23 11/6 11/20 12/5 Go away troll.
4merper4mer Posted December 18, 2016 Author Posted December 18, 2016 He gets some credit today. Good game against an ok team. First time in a while for him.
Maury Ballstein Posted December 18, 2016 Posted December 18, 2016 He gets some credit today. Good game against an ok team. First time in a while for him.
Beef Jerky Posted December 18, 2016 Posted December 18, 2016 He gets some credit today. Good game against an ok team. First time in a while for him. You are an embarrassment on this forum...
26CornerBlitz Posted January 19, 2017 Posted January 19, 2017 @sn_nfl Colts QB Andrew Luck had surgery on throwing shoulder http://dlvr.it/N8Szc2
HT02 Posted January 19, 2017 Posted January 19, 2017 He's a good player on a bad team. Wins and losses are a team outcome. Dumb thread is dumb. Agreed, I'd take him in a minute.
26CornerBlitz Posted January 19, 2017 Posted January 19, 2017 @RapSheet My understanding of #Colts QB Andrew Luck’s timeline post-surgery: 3 months to start throwing. 6 months for a full return. That’s mid-July.
Alphadawg7 Posted January 19, 2017 Posted January 19, 2017 (edited) The truth on Andrew Luck: 1. He has all the tools to be Elite...BUT he is not yet reached that status. 2. The Colts actually won more games without him than they did with him in 2015. 6-3 without him, 2-5 with him. 3. He has more turnovers than TD's in 3 seasons in the playoffs. 4. He has NEVER had a postseason with more TD's than turnovers, even after winning 11, 11 and 12 games in those playoffs years in the regular season. 5. His playoff QB rating is very low in 3 years, again on a team that won 34 games over those 3 regular seasons. 6. He has real long term injury concerns the way he plays. Bottom line, his story is far from over. He does need more help on that roster, so its more than likely we haven't seen the best of him yet. However, at this time, he is too often over rated for what he has delivered. You can't be considered a top QB in the NFL when you turn the ball over as much as he does, see your play dramatically drop off in the post season from what it was in the regular season, and watch your team win more games with you off the field. Personally, I do believe he will get better, but until he does, he is not the guy many paint him to be on this board when they talk about him. He has the tools and potential to be that guy, but until he is he is just an over rated QB making more than he is producing. Edited January 19, 2017 by Alphadawg7
FireChan Posted January 19, 2017 Posted January 19, 2017 The truth on Andrew Luck: 1. He has all the tools to be Elite...BUT he is not yet reached that status. 2. The Colts actually won more games without him than they did with him in 2015. 6-3 without him, 2-5 with him. 3. He has more turnovers than TD's in 3 seasons in the playoffs. 4. He has NEVER had a postseason with more TD's than turnovers, even after winning 11, 11 and 12 games in those playoffs years in the regular season. 5. His playoff QB rating is very low in 3 years, again on a team that won 34 games over those 3 regular seasons. 6. He has real long term injury concerns the way he plays. Bottom line, his story is far from over. He does need more help on that roster, so its more than likely we haven't seen the best of him yet. However, at this time, he is too often over rated for what he has delivered. You can't be considered a top QB in the NFL when you turn the ball over as much as he does, see your play dramatically drop off in the post season from what it was in the regular season, and watch your team win more games with you off the field. Personally, I do believe he will get better, but until he does, he is not the guy many paint him to be on this board when they talk about him. He has the tools and potential to be that guy, but until he is he is just an over rated QB making more than he is producing. Talk about skewed. What's the Colts record with Luck in total compared to without him in 2015? Lots of good QB's do worse in the postseason. Luck carried that team to the playoffs in his first three years and had some bad games against other playoff teams. Big deal. He's not even overrated anymore. He's a top 5 QB under 30, which is what he's always been touted as. A young, good QB, who was surefire to be a good QB on draft day. Period.
4merper4mer Posted January 20, 2017 Author Posted January 20, 2017 Talk about skewed. What's the Colts record with Luck in total compared to without him in 2015? Lots of good QB's do worse in the postseason. Luck carried that team to the playoffs in his first three years and had some bad games against other playoff teams. Big deal. He's not even overrated anymore. He's a top 5 QB under 30, which is what he's always been touted as. A young, good QB, who was surefire to be a good QB on draft day. Period. Hasselbeck outperformed him in 2015 and then retired due to being 96 years old. Is that even debatable? 2016 brought a .500 record in the worst division in the history of sports.....well very bad at least. This included games where he blatantly choked late against bad teams. But you're right, he's "good".
OldTimer1960 Posted January 20, 2017 Posted January 20, 2017 Hasselbeck outperformed him in 2015 and then retired due to being 96 years old. Is that even debatable? 2016 brought a .500 record in the worst division in the history of sports.....well very bad at least. This included games where he blatantly choked late against bad teams. But you're right, he's "good". I would trade this year's and next year's first and second round picks for Luck in a heartbeat
FireChan Posted January 20, 2017 Posted January 20, 2017 Hasselbeck outperformed him in 2015 and then retired due to being 96 years old. Is that even debatable? 2016 brought a .500 record in the worst division in the history of sports.....well very bad at least. This included games where he blatantly choked late against bad teams. But you're right, he's "good". Career record 43-27. Matt Hasselback's is 85-75. He is good. As far as Luck is concerned he had one injury filled year and one down year. Still went 11-5 3 years in a row, still made the postseason 3 times and beat some good teams there. That's just the facts.
4merper4mer Posted January 20, 2017 Author Posted January 20, 2017 (edited) Career record 43-27. Matt Hasselback's is 85-75. He is good. As far as Luck is concerned he had one injury filled year and one down year. Still went 11-5 3 years in a row, still made the postseason 3 times and beat some good teams there. That's just the facts. He gas beaten exactly zero good teams in the playoffs. Zero. The only debatable one is a game against the Chiefs where he staked them to a big lead by playing crappy and then the Chiefs returned the favor. You know what.... I'll give you Denver that one year before they got crushed by flat balls. It was a nice road win against a decent, if overrated team. The facts are that he is burning their salary cap and producing very little in return. I have nothing against him. He seems like a good dude, but facts are facts. I find it weird that people are simply willing to believe he is wonderful because that us the mantra but when you watch him play the Colts barf it up time after time in tight late game situations against bad teams. Edited January 20, 2017 by 4merper4mer
Recommended Posts