BillsNYC Posted February 23, 2005 Posted February 23, 2005 Lowz-men Lahz-men Los-men Lowz-man Lahz-man Los-man Well..which is it?
/dev/null Posted February 23, 2005 Posted February 23, 2005 los-man as in, playing a rookie quarterback may result in another loss man
cåblelady Posted February 23, 2005 Posted February 23, 2005 as in, playing a rookie quarterback may result in another loss man 249865[/snapback]
billsfanone Posted February 23, 2005 Posted February 23, 2005 Right or wrong, I'm sticking with Lowz-Man. Although I think it's Lahz-Man.
cåblelady Posted February 23, 2005 Posted February 23, 2005 Right or wrong, I'm sticking with Lowz-Man. Although I think it's Lahz-Man. 249883[/snapback] The "z" is actually an "s". Trust me.
nodnarb Posted February 23, 2005 Posted February 23, 2005 don't read into it, but it's Loss-man. The Loss-man and Mularkey era had better be good, or else writers and sports historians will have two easy marks.
Buftex Posted February 23, 2005 Posted February 23, 2005 When drafted, it was said it is prounounced as Loss-man!
stevestojan Posted February 23, 2005 Posted February 23, 2005 Right or wrong, I'm sticking with Lowz-Man. 249883[/snapback] Just to clarify, it is wrong. It's JP Loss-man... Actually, most people actually pronounce it Loss-men if you think about it... not too many people say the hard A like in MAN.
BillsNYC Posted February 23, 2005 Author Posted February 23, 2005 I hate Lossman...easier to say lowzmen....
BillsNYC Posted February 23, 2005 Author Posted February 23, 2005 I'm gonna call him Paul... Or maybe I'll call him The Saint.... as in St. John, St. Paul... Or the Pope...
Recommended Posts