26CornerBlitz Posted September 12, 2016 Posted September 12, 2016 Yes, I think Fitz is better than Tyrod. Fitz is a choking dog who will lead a team nowhere.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted September 12, 2016 Posted September 12, 2016 Fitz is a choking dog who will lead a team nowhere. Tyrod is at best a 20-25 level QB who may make some scintillating plays but can't hit anything over the middle or intermediate. No touch, no poise.
26CornerBlitz Posted September 12, 2016 Posted September 12, 2016 Tyrod is at best a 20-25 level QB who may make some scintillating plays but can't hit anything over the middle or intermediate. No touch, no poise. I don't know what Tyrod is yet, but yesterday was not a good sign. What I do know is that Fitz is a veteran QB who is best suited for back up duty in the NFL.
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted September 12, 2016 Posted September 12, 2016 Yes, I think Fitz is better than Tyrod. Dear god I hope not... He pulled off one of his specialties yesterday...
TH3 Posted September 12, 2016 Posted September 12, 2016 (edited) Fitz is a choking dog who will lead a team nowhere. TT is worse in the 4th quarter..just chokes by not doing anyhting..and actually worse in the first three too.... Edited September 12, 2016 by baskin
metzelaars_lives Posted September 12, 2016 Posted September 12, 2016 (edited) Name all the posters on TBD who know all the other 31 rosters well enough to give an intelligent answer to this question. Like who here is qualified to speak to the Bears' safety depth? Exactly. Edited September 12, 2016 by metzelaars_lives
baskingridgebillsfan Posted September 12, 2016 Posted September 12, 2016 Take the quarterback out of the equation. The Bills roster is fine. The difference in yesterdays game was Flacco vs Taylor. I take the quarterback out of the evaluation because it is very random how you can get them. You can luck into one like the Tom Brady , you can risk three first round pics on Rg3 and miss or you can finish dead last the year Andrew Luck is available
BuffaloBaumer Posted September 12, 2016 Author Posted September 12, 2016 (edited) Take the quarterback out of the equation. The Bills roster is fine. The difference in yesterdays game was Flacco vs Taylor. I take the quarterback out of the evaluation because it is very random how you can get them. You can luck into one like the Tom Brady , you can risk three first round pics on Rg3 and miss or you can finish dead last the year Andrew Luck is available The QB is all I care about in this equation and the Browns front office is the only one worse than our own at finding one Edited September 12, 2016 by BuffaloBaumer
MarkyMannn Posted September 12, 2016 Posted September 12, 2016 You're definitely not a Pro Personnel Guy in the NFL. 41,000 posts isn't a qualifier either
baskingridgebillsfan Posted September 12, 2016 Posted September 12, 2016 It just seems that way , there are the usual suspects , heck the Jets are using a Bills reject.
MarkyMannn Posted September 12, 2016 Posted September 12, 2016 Take the quarterback out of the equation. The Bills roster is fine. The difference in yesterdays game was Flacco vs Taylor. I take the quarterback out of the evaluation because it is very random how you can get them. You can luck into one like the Tom Brady , you can risk three first round pics on Rg3 and miss or you can finish dead last the year Andrew Luck is available Our Oline was useless yesterday, Couldn't run or pass block. D played OK against a poor Raven offense. D could have made a play to win the game maybe. Difference between winners and losers. The Darby drop
DrDawkinstein Posted September 12, 2016 Posted September 12, 2016 (edited) It just seems that way , there are the usual suspects , heck the Jets are using a Bills reject. And losing in the same exact way he did when he was with the Bills. Last drive interceptions, every time. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 99.9% of the posters here dont follow other teams enough to accurately answer this question. Yes, I think Fitz is better than Tyrod. Proving my point^^^ Edited September 12, 2016 by DrDareustein
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted September 12, 2016 Posted September 12, 2016 And losing in the same exact way he did when he was with the Bills. Last drive interceptions, every time. Proving my point^^^ Pff. Name that QB: 19/35 189 2/1 15/22 111 0/0
DrDawkinstein Posted September 12, 2016 Posted September 12, 2016 Our Oline was useless yesterday, Couldn't run or pass block. D played OK against a poor Raven offense. D could have made a play to win the game maybe. Difference between winners and losers. The Darby drop Not true. Tyrod had ample time on plenty of plays but failed to pull the trigger. And they were up against a stacked box against the run. That is all on the OC and QB Pff. Name that QB: 0-1 0-1 fixed for ya
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted September 12, 2016 Posted September 12, 2016 Not true. Tyrod had ample time on plenty of plays but failed to pull the trigger. And they were up against a stacked box against the run. That is all on the OC and QB fixed for ya If OUR qb had the first stat line he'd be 1-0.
DrDawkinstein Posted September 12, 2016 Posted September 12, 2016 If OUR qb had the first stat line he'd be 1-0. And if Fitz was our QB yesterday, with our OC and gameplan, we'd still be 0-1. What you just said doesnt prove your point that Fitz>TT
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted September 12, 2016 Posted September 12, 2016 And if Fitz was our QB yesterday, with our OC and gameplan, we'd still be 0-1. What you just said doesnt prove your point that Fitz>TT I gotcha. So TT bears zero responsibility for offensive futility. I'll slide you over into the JfH box. Thanks.
Guest K-GunJimKelly12 Posted September 12, 2016 Posted September 12, 2016 NYJ? QB superiority? Possibly OAK and JAX with both on the rise. I don't think there is any question at this point that Jacksonville and Oakland are in a far superior spot to the Bills where QB is concerned.
Bills Fan in MD Posted September 12, 2016 Posted September 12, 2016 I was thinking of posting something similar, but not sure you can pin it all on the roster. There's definitely talent on this team, but the whole thing seems oddly constructed. There's also serious issues with the coaching, and I'm starting to wonder if the medical staff is even close to being up to par.. I'm not sure I would say that the roster is in the bottom tier of the league, but when you grade the entire organization from top to bottom, I'm not sure anyone other than Cleveland is worse. It could be a really ugly year.
BuffaloBaumer Posted September 12, 2016 Author Posted September 12, 2016 I was thinking of posting something similar, but not sure you can pin it all on the roster. There's definitely talent on this team, but the whole thing seems oddly constructed. There's also serious issues with the coaching, and I'm starting to wonder if the medical staff is even close to being up to par.. I'm not sure I would say that the roster is in the bottom tier of the league, but when you grade the entire organization from top to bottom, I'm not sure anyone other than Cleveland is worse. It could be a really ugly year. I am basically saying that team for team (everything included...coaches, players, whatever)....there are only 3 -4 teams I would not make the switch with right now.
Recommended Posts