Buffalo Barbarian Posted September 9, 2016 Posted September 9, 2016 How long before we trade for Siemian if TT falters
Dr.Sack Posted September 9, 2016 Posted September 9, 2016 2 picks in the first start and could have easily had the other one near the goal line. It appears the Denver QB is an interception machine. He may set the record for picks in a season. George Blanda tossed 42 in '62. Can Siemian set the record and simultaneously prove how good Denver's defense is by overcoming the worst QB season 54 years?
Beef Jerky Posted September 9, 2016 Posted September 9, 2016 This was a classic week 1 rust game the Panthers should have easily won.
Blokestradamus Posted September 9, 2016 Posted September 9, 2016 On 9/9/2016 at 12:56 AM, YoloinOhio said: Blokes jinxed Booker. I said everyone would know who he is. They do now
plenzmd1 Posted September 9, 2016 Posted September 9, 2016 On 9/9/2016 at 4:01 AM, Doc said: Headshots are illegal no matter how you play. Period. Huh? is that a new rule? No penalty for hitting a runner in the head is there? Now, i agree in the pocket..and the gray area outside where is he a runner or not. Have a feeling after the whole day of this discussion, any thing thats close to the head is getting called on Sunday
K D Posted September 9, 2016 Posted September 9, 2016 Lots being made of Cam getting hit but there's lots of plays where he lowered his shoulder and brought it to them as well. If you want to be a runner and bring the boom then just realize that it goes both ways. Tyrod and Cam need to learn to slide. Only then will they be protected like other QB's
Andrew Son Posted September 9, 2016 Posted September 9, 2016 On 9/9/2016 at 10:21 AM, kdiggz said: Lots being made of Cam getting hit but there's lots of plays where he lowered his shoulder and brought it to them as well. If you want to be a runner and bring the boom then just realize that it goes both ways. Tyrod and Cam need to learn to slide. Only then will they be protected like other QB's What does his running have to do with taking headshots while in the pocket? Brady gets looked at and it's a personal foul. That was disgraceful
Wayne Cubed Posted September 9, 2016 Posted September 9, 2016 On 9/9/2016 at 10:21 AM, kdiggz said: Lots being made of Cam getting hit but there's lots of plays where he lowered his shoulder and brought it to them as well. If you want to be a runner and bring the boom then just realize that it goes both ways. Tyrod and Cam need to learn to slide. Only then will they be protected like other QB's Umm... The Broncos were head hunting.
mannc Posted September 9, 2016 Posted September 9, 2016 (edited) On 9/9/2016 at 10:31 AM, Wayne Cubed said: Umm... The Broncos were head hunting. Was that the hit by Stewart? Should have been an ejection. Also does not seem fair that it's wiped out by intentional grounding. Yeah, Cam was really asking for it there😆 Edited September 9, 2016 by mannc
Wayne Cubed Posted September 9, 2016 Posted September 9, 2016 On 9/9/2016 at 10:36 AM, mannc said: Was that the hit by Stewart? Should have been an ejection. Also does not seem fair that it's wiped out by intentional grounding. Yeah, Cam was really asking for it there😆 He launched with his head and didn't even attempt to tackle him properly. Should have definitely been an ejection, the ref was right there!
Maury Ballstein Posted September 9, 2016 Posted September 9, 2016 On 9/9/2016 at 10:36 AM, mannc said: Was that the hit by Stewart? Should have been an ejection. Also does not seem fair that it's wiped out by intentional grounding. Yeah, Cam was really asking for it there Killshot being negated by a penalty = NFL cares about safety of the players.
eball Posted September 9, 2016 Posted September 9, 2016 On 9/9/2016 at 10:21 AM, kdiggz said: Lots being made of Cam getting hit but there's lots of plays where he lowered his shoulder and brought it to them as well. If you want to be a runner and bring the boom then just realize that it goes both ways. Tyrod and Cam need to learn to slide. Only then will they be protected like other QB's Wow, what a horrible, horrible take in the context of this discussion. Why am I not surprised.
GunnerBill Posted September 9, 2016 Posted September 9, 2016 On 9/9/2016 at 10:36 AM, mannc said: Was that the hit by Stewart? Should have been an ejection. Also does not seem fair that it's wiped out by intentional grounding. I agree and thought that in real time. There are some penalties that should not be capable of offsetting an illegal shot to the head like that.
nucci Posted September 9, 2016 Posted September 9, 2016 On 9/9/2016 at 10:31 AM, Wayne Cubed said: Umm... The Broncos were head hunting. How is this not a penalty? One of our players was called for personal foul for hitting the QB at the waist this preseason
mannc Posted September 9, 2016 Posted September 9, 2016 On 9/9/2016 at 11:32 AM, nucci said: How is this not a penalty? One of our players was called for personal foul for hitting the QB at the waist this preseasonThat one was called--roughing the passer, but it was offset by intentional grounding call on Cam. Still not right, though.
Wayne Cubed Posted September 9, 2016 Posted September 9, 2016 On 9/9/2016 at 11:32 AM, nucci said: How is this not a penalty? One of our players was called for personal foul for hitting the QB at the waist this preseason It was a penalty but it was offset. Should have been an ejection. There were more:
Wayne Arnold Posted September 9, 2016 Posted September 9, 2016 On 9/9/2016 at 11:32 AM, nucci said: How is this not a penalty? One of our players was called for personal foul for hitting the QB at the waist this preseason It was a penalty. I don't know why so many are whining in this thread. Unless they're all Panthers fans on a Bills forum.
GunnerBill Posted September 9, 2016 Posted September 9, 2016 On 9/9/2016 at 11:43 AM, Wayne Arnold said: It was a penalty. I don't know why so many are whining in this thread. Unless they're all Panthers fans on a Bills forum. I am not whining but I do think it is an interesting rules question. Should something like intentional grounding a "technical" infingement really offset a potentially dangerous physical infringement?
nucci Posted September 9, 2016 Posted September 9, 2016 On 9/9/2016 at 11:34 AM, mannc said: That one was called--roughing the passer, but it was offset by intentional grounding call on Cam. Still not right, though. ahh, ok. thanks
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted September 9, 2016 Posted September 9, 2016 On 9/9/2016 at 11:13 AM, GunnerBill said: I agree and thought that in real time. There are some penalties that should not be capable of offsetting an illegal shot to the head like that. I agree. Also consider the fact that the reason he couldn't get it past the line of scrimmage is because a guy was in the process of spearing him In the face.
Recommended Posts