K D Posted September 4, 2016 Posted September 4, 2016 So is Manny getting suspended or what? Week 1 has already started and no word. I was hoping he would serve his 1 game suspension this week then we could re-sign him to a league min contract after that
NoSaint Posted September 4, 2016 Posted September 4, 2016 Some people's reactions to this is comical. You would have thought we released an in his prime Bruce Smith. Lawson is aging, average, over paid, and under investigation by the NFL. I'm not shocked. Which reaction gave you that sense?
GunnerBill Posted September 5, 2016 Posted September 5, 2016 Go with less talent this year so we can maybe sign a slightly better than average CB next year?. No. We are trying to sign Gilmore. I know he is not universally rated on this forum but let me guarantee you... if he hits free agency teams will be falling over themselves to throw $$$s at him and he will get a bigger deal than Norman. The Bills better hope their "show me the money" upfront strategy works again and we get a bit of a hometown discount on the deal.
reddogblitz Posted September 5, 2016 Posted September 5, 2016 (edited) No. We are trying to sign Gilmore. I know he is not universally rated on this forum but let me guarantee you... if he hits free agency teams will be falling over themselves to throw $$$s at him and he will get a bigger deal than Norman. The Bills better hope their "show me the money" upfront strategy works again and we get a bit of a hometown discount on the deal. I have no problem with resigning Gilmore. However, I do with at this point, playing for next year. If Lawson at LB gives us a better chance for playoffs this year, you go with him and worry about next year next year for the most part. We drafted Darby and I think he's even better than Gilmore. We also signed Graham. Gilmore is not the last good CB out there. He's not worth cutting guys this year to help us sign him next year IMHO. However, I just think Rex got tired of watching Manny crash in from the outside and then get run around for TDs and big gains. Dream on about the "hometown discount". Edited September 5, 2016 by reddogblitz
BADOLBILZ Posted September 5, 2016 Posted September 5, 2016 No. We are trying to sign Gilmore. I know he is not universally rated on this forum but let me guarantee you... if he hits free agency teams will be falling over themselves to throw $$$s at him and he will get a bigger deal than Norman. The Bills better hope their "show me the money" upfront strategy works again and we get a bit of a hometown discount on the deal. Best course is to use the tag on him, IMO.
John from Riverside Posted September 5, 2016 Posted September 5, 2016 Best course is to use the tag on him, IMO. I am in agreement with this.....its gonna end up being the same price no?
ganesh Posted September 5, 2016 Posted September 5, 2016 He did make Maybin look good for a few games. WE made Maybin look for the two games against us!!!
K D Posted September 5, 2016 Posted September 5, 2016 Best course is to use the tag on him, IMO. This. Getting tyrod done allows us the flexibility to use the tag on Gilmore if we have to. Would give our young guys 1 more year to develop to take over for him too
ganesh Posted September 5, 2016 Posted September 5, 2016 This. Getting tyrod done allows us the flexibility to use the tag on Gilmore if we have to. Would give our young guys 1 more year to develop to take over for him too Whaley believes Gilmore is a blue chipper and a top CB in this league. They will re-sign their own. The cost only goes up once you have tagged him.
BADOLBILZ Posted September 5, 2016 Posted September 5, 2016 Whaley believes Gilmore is a blue chipper and a top CB in this league. They will re-sign their own. The cost only goes up once you have tagged him. I am good with tagging for two years and see what it looks like then. I suspect he won't still be as highly regarded in two years. Good player but this is why you have a franchise tag.
3rdand12 Posted September 5, 2016 Posted September 5, 2016 Best course is to use the tag on him, IMO. Yep. He still gets plenty of money and should retain an incentive to play well. Not that he needs it. I hope Bills find a way to keep him though. he has improved each season. ps I really would like some insider info on Lawson. When is this NFL investigation going reveal itself??
thebandit27 Posted September 5, 2016 Posted September 5, 2016 I am good with tagging for two years and see what it looks like then. I suspect he won't still be as highly regarded in two years. Good player but this is why you have a franchise tag. I don't love the idea of tagging a guy for 2 years; the tag often leads to lower participation in offseason work, which can lead to injury and/or lack of production, which is a bad investment for $14M guaranteed.
K D Posted September 5, 2016 Posted September 5, 2016 Douzable taking #91. They must not be planning on Manny being on the team anymore then
3rdand12 Posted September 5, 2016 Posted September 5, 2016 I don't love the idea of tagging a guy for 2 years; the tag often leads to lower participation in offseason work, which can lead to injury and/or lack of production, which is a bad investment for $14M guaranteed. Thinking a year if need be. unfair to string a guy out longer than that, He still gets a raise. Do you think Bills can/wish to/ keep Gilmore Bandit ? since this is the Lawson thread i do not care to continue on the tangent, so that my last query about Happy. Douzable taking #91. They must not be planning on Manny being on the team anymore then Wow. Slam that door Buffalo! so much for a pay cut eh ?
r00tabaga Posted September 5, 2016 Posted September 5, 2016 Douzable taking #91. They must not be planning on Manny being on the team anymore then Where did you see this? Curious if Albright got a new #. Official site doesn't appear to be updated.
K D Posted September 5, 2016 Posted September 5, 2016 Where did you see this? Curious if Albright got a new #. Official site doesn't appear to be updated. Mike Rodak (@mikerodak) tweeted at 1:42 PM on Mon, Sep 05, 2016: Bills rookie CB Kevon Seymour will wear No. 29 and reserve DL Leger Douzable will now wear No. 91
Direhard Fan Posted September 5, 2016 Posted September 5, 2016 Seems like we are going in the youth direction which I believe is a nice one. We have plenty of vets to lead. Sounds like a plan to me. 10 and 6 this year. We just might surprise Balt. this week.
thebandit27 Posted September 5, 2016 Posted September 5, 2016 Where did you see this? Curious if Albright got a new #. Official site doesn't appear to be updated. Probably not on Albright; league began allowing LBs and DEs to wear numbers in the 40's last season. Other number changes: Seymour to 29 J. Williams to 31
r00tabaga Posted September 5, 2016 Posted September 5, 2016 Wonder if Vitale gets his #40 now if Williams is going with #31. He was #86 in TB.
26CornerBlitz Posted September 5, 2016 Posted September 5, 2016 Wonder if Vitale gets his #40 now if Williams is going with #31. He was #86 in TB. He'll wear #40.
Recommended Posts