Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

We need to move on from EJ cause we need Cardale Jones to be ready to assume #2 when EJ's rookie contract runs out. We are 4 years in and if he is still looking like a deer in the headlights I think odds are that isnt going to magically change. All of you working for the social media team for the PR firm he hired have done a good job but didnt have much to work with. Kudos to you.

 

How was EJ a deer in the headlights? He performed very well on Friday and led the team to a come-from-behind win.

  • Replies 405
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

If you insist..

 

Texans, he sucked. There were reasons he sucked, some outside of his control, but he was really bad on his own too.

 

Bengals, managed to put up 14 points in meaningful time. Fun fact about that game. 10 of EJ's completions came in the last two drives of garbage time down 20 points 10 minutes to go. He padded those stats against prevent. He stunk. Defense also stunk, but I digress.

 

Jags absolutely.

 

Then you start to take a look at other games and a clear picture forms. We beat Chicago, but EEeeeeeJjjjj only had to pass 22 times, and only passed for 173 yards. He didn't puke on his shoes, but it was hardly a stellar performance (not saying you think it was, but usually QB's worth a damn have some very good to great games at least once in a while).

 

Miami in 2014, similar story. Crouching offense, hidden EJ passing only 26 times.

 

Stunk vs Baltimore. TB. 1st Jets game. Steelers. Arguably Jags game.

 

The way I see it, EJ's best two games were his first two, some folks fell in love, and those same folks have been fighting a losing battle about EEEEEeeeeeeeeJJJJJJjjjjj since. First it was the hurry up O. Then it was Dougie Marrone sabotaging EJ by playing a inferior QB in Orton (lol on that one, in hindsight). Then it was EEeeeeeeeJJJJJjjjjj was gonna really start to develop with a real coaching staff in GRo (he dominated that Steelers preseason game), which resulted in 0-2 and EJ's worst game as a QB in his entire career and now the story is that he's not the worst back-up of all time. I kid you not, the same people have made every single one of these arguments since 2013. So when they say now that everyone who said EJ is garbage looks silly, I can't help but pipe up. They're batting .000 on the last 3 years of EEEEEEEEeeeeeeJJJJJjjjjjj predictions, but did you see that last preseason game?

You talked about Miami game. You know that Taylor only average 27 att. per game last year. Taylor threw three TDs againts NE prevent defense after NE got a big lead. Taylor had three int. and a fumble in that game. Tennessee game, we won last year Taylor had like 100 yds yards passing and we won that game. How did Taylor become a starter. That should all mean that he is a bad QB. You know that we were 3 wins and 6 losts when Taylor att. more than 27 passes.

Edited by Hanoverbills
Posted

How was EJ a deer in the headlights? He performed very well on Friday and led the team to a come-from-behind win.

Wow. Just wow. Obviously they aren't even training the Interns any more.

Posted

I agree that it appears EJ is going to be a decent backup this season. Take away 5 mins in the Jax game and he wasn't terrible in that role last year.

It's the people who still are trying to stir the pot between him and Taylor, that are annoying. I have a feeling these people are probably just pot stirrers smokers.

Fixed it for you.

Posted

Start games or be a starter? He isn't getting a starting job anywhere in the NFL now. If he plays 6 games or so and looks good someone may add him to be the QB. The only places that could happen though are SF, Cleveland & the Jets. Every other team either has their QB or has just drafted their QB. Cleveland probably adds theirs next year with those 2 early picks.

Dallas ????

Posted

Wow, your football knowledge is blue chip. Try Mark Brunell, Matt Hasselback, Aaron Brooks, and some Favre guy. Not one of these guys was picked with a 1st round pick and all became decent to good starters in the league.

 

He threw one long pass the entire game. And is this the Polian who basically built Indy on one player. And when that one player went down, they went 1-15. He crushed it drafting Qbs (well when he got to pick them with top 5 overall picks!).

My opinion is Polian purposely had the team tank to get Andrew Luck, a once in a decade type player.

 

When you look back at the Colts in the 2011 offseason all he had on the roster were inexperienced scrubs at QB (Curtis painter 0 starts & Dan Orlovsky from Detroit) and he didn't bring in an established veteran QB until two weeks before the season started in Kerry Collins. This is the same time that Peyton's longtime mentor Tom Moore retired from the team so the OC in Clyde Christensen only stayed as OC through 2011 and then he was replaced by Bruce Arians the next year.

 

Curtis Painter 0-8

Dan Orlovsky 2-3

Kerry Collins 0-3

 

What's interesting is that Collins started the first three games and then was replaced by Painter who didn't have much playing experience. So, the Colts were already 0-11 before the guy who actually had a chance to wins some games for them got a start. It cost him his job but Polian got his QB.

Posted

You talked about Miami game. You know that Taylor only average 27 att. per game last year. Taylor threw three TDs againts NE prevent defense after NE got a big lead. Taylor had three int. and a fumble in that game. Tennessee game, we won last year Taylor had like 100 yds yards passing and we won that game. How did Taylor become a starter. That should all mean that he is a bad QB. You know that we were 3 wins and 6 losts when Taylor att. more than 27 passes.

Deflection. Overruled.

 

Just like the "Polian sucks," or "Aaron Rodgers developed!" deflections. EJ sucks. Let's stay on that point.

Posted

Dallas ????

Nope

 

Who knows if Dak will keep it up but he's had one of the best preseasons of all-time. They certainly wouldn't give EJ the chance to play ahead of Dak. My guess is they add someone like Sanchez to backup Dak.

Posted

 

How was EJ a deer in the headlights? He performed very well on Friday and led the team to a come-from-behind win.

He did? I must have missed the 5th quarter because at the end of 4 quarters the Redskins were winning. Who knew!

Posted

 

The irony meter just broke.

 

Try E. James, Reggie Wayne, Dwight Freeney, Dallas Clark, Bob Sanders, Robert Mathis, Antoine Bethea, Pat McAfee, and a bunch of O-linemen (Ryan Diem) who started/contributed right away, as well as role players like Austin Collie.

And most of those guys were players on a team that went 1-15 without one player.

 

As bad as the Bills have drafted, they could win 6-7 games starting Losman and Edwards. Polian crushed it with his Painter and Sgori picks.

Posted (edited)

Then you start to take a look at other games and a clear picture forms. We beat Chicago, but EEeeeeeJjjjj only had to pass 22 times, and only passed for 173 yards. He didn't puke on his shoes, but it was hardly a stellar performance (not saying you think it was, but usually QB's worth a damn have some very good to great games at least once in a while).

 

Not to whizz on anyone's biscuit and certainly not to argue that the QB depth chart should be changed, but we do realize that in 5 of the 8 games Tyrod won last year, he passed less than 20 times for an average of less than 180 yards? In the other three games he won, he passed less than 30 times for an average of about 200 yards? The 6 games where he passed more than 30 times, we lost, and never has he put up more than 300 yards.

 

I guess I'm just trying to figure out what the standard of good/promising QBing vs suckitude is here. I would say fair is fair, and if you're going to talk about how EEeeeeeJjjjj "only" had to pass 22 yards and "only" passed for 173 yards, or if the standard for a QB worth a damn is to pass >30 times for 300 yds at least occasionally, then by those standards we still don't have a QB worth a damn.

 

Me, I thought EJ has had some good games mixed in with some awful games, and I think Taylor is fun to watch and overall shows a higher level of QB play and more promise, but neither of them meet a gunslinger QB standard.

Edited by Hopeful
Posted

 

That's actually not what Rodgers and other QB guru types say - they say his passing skill and game knowledge both developed considerably during his years on the bench. But you can assert whatever you like because it can never be proven or disproven.

 

I think all this is missing the telling point. When GB traded for Favre, they had an established QB who had set franchise records and won playoffs, Don Majkowski (but also suffered from injury) and also had acquired Mike Tomczak from the Bears. They had Favre when they drafted Hasselbeck. They had Favre when they drafted Rodgers, they could afford to let him sit. They had Rodgers when they drafted Brohm, they could afford a dud.

 

Historically, something like 50% of QB drafted in the 1st round don't become starters and it goes down to 30% at the top of the 2nd round and falls rapidly. The point isn't that a team should be admired because every draft choice they make at QB proves out. The point is that they're taking their shots, and taking them before they need to, so that they don't have to succeed.

 

That's the real problem with the EJ draft choice. By waiting until they were sure Fitz wouldn't work for them, the Bills put themselves in a position where they needed their QB draftee to work out and they needed to draft in a weak class. By releasing Fitz and trying to replace him with the oft-injured and beaten on Kolb, they put EJ in a position where he needed to succeed immediately. If the Bills had been drafting QB all along, people could probably criticize their choices saying "yeah, who have they succeeded with?" but by waiting to draft until they really needed a guy, they put themselves in position to fail.

sums it up rather well i think. and why i was delighted bills drafted Cardale.

Next year they should spy another.

Even if Bills do not "need" one, if they find a gem there will be value associated. and hence trade leverage. Eagles might have that now. But do it with rookies contracts and someone looks genius here

Posted

 

Not to whizz on anyone's biscuit and certainly not to argue that the QB depth chart should be changed, but we do realize that in 5 of the 8 games Tyrod won last year, he passed less than 20 times for an average of less than 180 yards? In the other three games he won, he passed less than 30 times for an average of about 200 yards? The 6 games where he passed more than 30 times, we lost, and never has he put up more than 300 yards.

 

I guess I'm just trying to figure out what the standard of good/promising QBing vs suckitude is here. I would say fair is fair, and if you're going to talk about how EEeeeeeJjjjj "only" had to pass 22 yards and "only" passed for 173 yards, or if the standard for a QB worth a damn is to pass >30 times for 300 yds at least occasionally, then by those standards we still don't have a QB worth a damn.

 

Me, I thought EJ has had some good games mixed in with some awful games, and I think Taylor is fun to watch and overall shows a higher level of QB play and more promise, but neither of them meet a gunslinger QB standard.

Tyrod is not germane in this discussion.

 

But to answer your question, yes I do address that, and my opinion of Tyrod's ability as a QB is consistent with my position on EJ.

Posted (edited)

And most of those guys were players on a team that went 1-15 without one player.

 

As bad as the Bills have drafted, they could win 6-7 games starting Losman and Edwards. Polian crushed it with his Painter and Sgori picks.

 

Look, you said Polian built a team on one guy--a ridiculous statement, as he drafted a bunch of great players as well. One WR is in the HOF, anther might join him. James has been on the ballot and is a legit candidate.

 

And now you are condemning Polian's Indy career because he saw Luck coming and the deteriorating Manning going---and secured for that franchise 2 generational QBs?? How is that not a stroke of genius?? What are you thinking? It never occurred to you that this was a good plan?

Edited by Mr. WEO
Posted

 

Not to whizz on anyone's biscuit and certainly not to argue that the QB depth chart should be changed, but we do realize that in 5 of the 8 games Tyrod won last year, he passed less than 20 times for an average of less than 180 yards? In the other three games he won, he passed less than 30 times for an average of about 200 yards? The 6 games where he passed more than 30 times, we lost, and never has he put up more than 300 yards.

 

I guess I'm just trying to figure out what the standard of good/promising QBing vs suckitude is here. I would say fair is fair, and if you're going to talk about how EEeeeeeJjjjj "only" had to pass 22 yards and "only" passed for 173 yards, or if the standard for a QB worth a damn is to pass >30 times for 300 yds at least occasionally, then by those standards we still don't have a QB worth a damn.

 

Me, I thought EJ has had some good games mixed in with some awful games, and I think Taylor is fun to watch and overall shows a higher level of QB play and more promise, but neither of them meet a gunslinger QB standard.

I've been attempting to get this same thought through to some fans and a few won't let it get by their hate for EJ. The simple truth is that a strong run game when it's working, is the best help you can give a young QB and when forced to throw more then they run it, it usually ends in a loss. Eventually down the road, once they have adapted to the scheme and play calls, that young QB should start to develop into a stronger passer who can throw more when needed.

 

EJ was 21 of 39 for 221 yards, 1 INT. while the team ran 30 times for 144 yards which is a decent balance in my view. I think the Bills FO should be pleased with his progress so far. I feel that he would have done better with the starting O-line and Watkins, Woods and Clay in there too.

Posted

 

How was EJ a deer in the headlights? He performed very well on Friday and led the team to a come-from-behind win.

I caught a replay of the game and 2 days later it's still 21-16 Redskins

Posted

I was out of the broadcast area last night. The radio broadcast that I was able to get was Washington coverage. They praised the defender on the Gragg hit. QUESTION- Did EJ throw Gragg into trouble? Bad QBs do that and EJ is known for hanging his receivers out to take a big hit.

No.
Posted

EJ can be as mentally sharp and game ready as anyone that has ever played, but that hitch windup throwing motion will never put him in a position to be a decent NFL QB. It's one of the worst NFL throwing motions I've ever seen.

Posted

EJ can be as mentally sharp and game ready as anyone that has ever played, but that hitch windup throwing motion will never put him in a position to be a decent NFL QB. It's one of the worst NFL throwing motions I've ever seen.

Are you a coach, scout or GM?

×
×
  • Create New...