The Frankish Reich Posted August 29, 2016 Posted August 29, 2016 This is a very rational view. I merely want to add that a guy who earned notoriety for getting open has the potential to be extremely productive when coupled with a first ballot hall of fame QB. Rationality here will get you pilloried as (1) a Pats troll; and/or (2) a Hogan lover, as in literally someone who has had sex with Hogan.
GG Posted August 29, 2016 Posted August 29, 2016 Randle gets open well enough, but has stone hands. A Little clone?
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted August 29, 2016 Posted August 29, 2016 Rationality here will get you pilloried as (1) a Pats troll; and/or (2) a Hogan lover, as in literally someone who has had sex with Hogan. Oh and I play lacrosse
Webster Guy Posted August 29, 2016 Posted August 29, 2016 80 grabs as the 5th receiving option behind gronk, bennett and the 2 white midgets? try 40
The Frankish Reich Posted August 29, 2016 Posted August 29, 2016 Oh and I play lacrosse I should've known. You, sir, have zero credibility.
Marty McFly Posted August 29, 2016 Posted August 29, 2016 Welker has a short complex and on his wedding he hired a bunch of midget waiters so he would be taller than all of them. lmao! is that true? Im not gonna lie, that midget stripper i posted is pretty hot. Id smash her all day #noprejudicetohotmidgetgirls .
Kelly the Dog Posted August 29, 2016 Posted August 29, 2016 lmao! is that true? Im not gonna lie, that midget stripper i posted is pretty hot. Id smash her all day #noprejudicetohotmidgetgirls .Okay so it wasn't his wedding, it was a couple parties he threw...http://larrybrownsports.com/football/wes-welker-wore-a-bills-shirt-and-threw-a-party-with-little-people-waiters-picture/97873
Saxum Posted August 30, 2016 Posted August 30, 2016 (edited) Someone thinks Hogan was pretty good and will contribute to "One reason each NFL team won't win the Super Bowl" http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/gallery/nfl-super-bowl-one-reason-wont-win-each-team-cowboys-patriots-giants-cardinals-083016 Buffalo Bills: the receivers behind Sammy Watkins The Bills had a solid No. 2 receiver in Chris Hogan, but he’s now with the Patriots. Robert Woods has the spot now, but he saw his role greatly decrease last season, partly because of his declining production and Hogan’s presence. The Bills are going to run the ball a lot in 2016, but Tyrod Taylor needs more weapons around him. Edited August 30, 2016 by Koolaid
YoloinOhio Posted August 30, 2016 Posted August 30, 2016 Someone thinks Hogan was pretty good and will contribute to "One reason each NFL team won't win the Super Bowl" Buffalo Bills: the receivers behind Sammy Watkins The Bills had a solid No. 2 receiver in Chris Hogan, but hes now with the Patriots. Robert Woods has the spot now, but he saw his role greatly decrease last season, partly because of his declining production and Hogans presence. The Bills are going to run the ball a lot in 2016, but Tyrod Taylor needs more weapons around him. since when was Hogan a solid #2 WR here? Or a #2 WR at all?
Saxum Posted August 30, 2016 Posted August 30, 2016 since when was Hogan a solid #2 WR here? Or a #2 WR at all? He definitely was #2 at times when Robert Woods was unable to play but the person who thinks so is on Fox, link added.
Kelly the Dog Posted August 30, 2016 Posted August 30, 2016 He definitely was #2 at times when Robert Woods was unable to play but the person who thinks so is on Fox, link added. Hogan didn't gain playing time because of declined production by Woods or Hogan's presence, the small amount of time it was true was due to injury. At no time was Hogan ahead of Woods on what would be considered a depth chart.
YoloinOhio Posted August 30, 2016 Posted August 30, 2016 He definitely was #2 at times when Robert Woods was unable to play but the person who thinks so is on Fox, link added. i know, Fox did no research. #2 at times when Woods was unable to play means he was a backup to Woods. Woods was #1 at times when Watkins couldn't play too but it doesn't make Woods a #1 WR.
Saxum Posted August 30, 2016 Posted August 30, 2016 i know, Fox did no research. #2 at times when Woods was unable to play means he was a backup to Woods. Woods was #1 at times when Watkins couldn't play too but it doesn't make Woods a #1 WR. You have bashed Hogan enough to know your opinion. Fox writer thought he was a solid WR.
26CornerBlitz Posted August 30, 2016 Posted August 30, 2016 Hogan didn't gain playing time because of declined production by Woods or Hogan's presence, the small amount of time it was true was due to injury. At no time was Hogan ahead of Woods on what would be considered a depth chart. Not for even one second. There's nothing about Hogan that says legit #2 WR.
YoloinOhio Posted August 30, 2016 Posted August 30, 2016 You have bashed Hogan enough to know your opinion. Fox writer thought he was a solid WR.ha! I don't recall ever "bashing" Hogan. A solid #2 WR is not what he was, literally. A solid WR? That's an opinion they are welcome to. Indicating he was a solid #2 WR is factually incorrect and that was what I pointed out. Carry on.
Kirby Jackson Posted August 30, 2016 Posted August 30, 2016 (edited) I've bashed him enough to know that being 111th in the NFL in catches and 109th in yards doesn't make you a solid #2. That makes you a middle of the road 4th option. http://www.espn.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/receiving/sort/receptions/qualified/false/count/81 Edited August 31, 2016 by Kirby Jackson
NoSaint Posted August 31, 2016 Posted August 31, 2016 You have bashed Hogan enough to know your opinion. Fox writer thought he was a solid WR. You are linking a quote from a guy that clearly wasn't familiar with our WRs, so I'm not sure it's the best source for definitive takes on one of their abilities.
Saxum Posted August 31, 2016 Posted August 31, 2016 You are linking a quote from a guy that clearly wasn't familiar with our WRs, so I'm not sure it's the best source for definitive takes on one of their abilities. Clearly he is NoSaint but that is a good thing; clearly he does not agree with you. But not sure not agreeing with you means wasn't familiar with our WRs as this thread shows not all Bills fans agree. And I added to thread rather than starting new thread not added my opinion just tried to interpret what he wrote. And if a #8 choice can be a pro bowl player because all of the players ahead of him declines. a backup WR can be #2 or even #1 WR even if it is just for 1 week. We actually had 2 starting QBs last year.
NoSaint Posted August 31, 2016 Posted August 31, 2016 Clearly he is NoSaint but that is a good thing; clearly he does not agree with you. But not sure not agreeing with you means wasn't familiar with our WRs as this thread shows not all Bills fans agree. And I added to thread rather than starting new thread not added my opinion just tried to interpret what he wrote. And if a #8 choice can be a pro bowl player because all of the players ahead of him declines. a backup WR can be #2 or even #1 WR even if it is just for 1 week. We actually had 2 starting QBs last year. Agree or disagree on his opinion of hogan--- he didn't seem to understand both the depth chart and injuries... At that point can you say he was watching closely enough to evaluate skill/technique? Or simply pulling quick bullets on teams after just passing glances at some?
3rdand12 Posted August 31, 2016 Posted August 31, 2016 Why do we care? Is there a single poster here that thinks the Bills should have gone 3/12 on Hogan? Hey !! lmao! is that true? Im not gonna lie, that midget stripper i posted is pretty hot. Id smash her all day #noprejudicetohotmidgetgirls . rethinking my whole value system. thanks for that M M
Recommended Posts