26CornerBlitz Posted August 31, 2016 Posted August 31, 2016 @JasonColeBR However, source said DL Mike Neal, who hasn't been cleared yet, did have a relationship with people at Guyer Institute. @AlbertBreer 1) The launch of the league's investigative arm put cooperation at a premium, given their lack of subpoena power. This is another example. 2) The guys cleared didn't do their fellow players any favors. This sets a bad precedent, cooperating w/o the NFL having credible evidence.
Mr. WEO Posted August 31, 2016 Posted August 31, 2016 @JasonColeBR However, source said DL Mike Neal, who hasn't been cleared yet, did have a relationship with people at Guyer Institute. @AlbertBreer 1) The launch of the league's investigative arm put cooperation at a premium, given their lack of subpoena power. This is another example. 2) The guys cleared didn't do their fellow players any favors. This sets a bad precedent, cooperating w/o the NFL having credible evidence. What precedent? It would have been unprecedented if they refused to participate in questioning. The NFL gets to judge the credibility of the evidence, just as does any employer investigating workplace rules/contract violations.
Benjamin Franklin Posted August 31, 2016 Posted August 31, 2016 I'm happy Clay Matthews was cleared. No way he's on PEDs.
Kemp2Warlick Posted August 31, 2016 Posted August 31, 2016 Around The NFL Retweeted James Harrison @jharrison9292 5m5 minutes ago It's only breaking news cause you thought I was guilty. I have my father's name and I have… https://www.instagram.com/p/BJyiskQgmFE/
3rdand12 Posted August 31, 2016 Posted August 31, 2016 I would be raged about this whole affair. Alot of wrong here. Only reasoning i could see is that the NFL wanted to clear it's holy name in the "mass" publics eye. very insulting to the players named
Recommended Posts