Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 129
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I just really hope we cut Gay. Wasting a spot for a kickoff specialist is a joke with kickoff moved to the 35 now

 

Actually it's the new touchback rule to the 25 that makes his position expendable.

Posted

My latest revision after pre-season game 2. Usual guide applies. Additions in red subtractions struckthrough.

 

 

QB: T. Taylor; EJ Manuel; C. Jones (3)

FB: J. Felton (1)

RB: L. McCoy; R. Bush; M Gillislee; J. Williams (4)

TE: C. Clay; C. Gragg; B. Annen (3)

WR: S. Watkins; R. Woods; G. Salas; M. Goodwin; D. Lewis, W. Powell; ​G. Little (6)

OL: C. Glenn; R. Incognito; E. Wood; J. Miller; J. Mills; C. Koundjio; F. Velasco; R. Groy; (8) 25

 

DL: K. Williams; M. Dareus; A. Washington; J. Worthy; C. Bryant; L. Douzable (6 5)

OLB: J. Hughes; M. Lawson; L. Alexander; E. Striker; M. Valles;K. Biermann (5)

ILB: P. Brown; Z. Brown; R. Johnson, D. Hawthorne; ​B. Spikes (4 5)

CB: S. Gilmore; R. Darby; N. Robey-Coleman; K. Seymour; C. White; (5)

S: A. Williams; C. Graham; R. Blanton; D. Williams; C. Anderson (5) 25

 

K: D. Carpenter; J. Gay (2 1)

P. C. Schmidt (1)

LS: G. Sanborn (1) 3

 

Additional Non-Active: S. Lawson, M. Easley (PUP); M. Dareus (Suspended first 4 weeks); R. Ragland & K. Listenbee (Injured Reserve); S. Henderson (Non-Football Illness); (6)

I think Striker is on the outside looking in. He's a 3rd down pass rush specialist only. Unfortunately he just doesn't have the size to set the edge.

 

Bryson Albright was given loads of snaps and I think proved he can set the edge and rush the passer. I'd give the nod to him at this point.

Posted

I think Striker is on the outside looking in. He's a 3rd down pass rush specialist only. Unfortunately he just doesn't have the size to set the edge.

 

Bryson Albright was given loads of snaps and I think proved he can set the edge and rush the passer. I'd give the nod to him at this point.

 

Hmm. I have to say I am not quite seeing what others are on Albright...... has he done well? Yes - but he still looks like a practice squad player to me at this stage. A lot of people whose views I respect on this bard are high on him but I am not quite there at this stage. He has got some push on some plays and been completely neutralised on others and his edge setting (certainly against the Colts) was inconsistent. I haven't watched Saturday night back for the 2nd time yet, which tends to be when I refine opinions because you do miss things first time round watching the ball but I'm not sold on Albright as a guy for the 53.

Posted

 

Hmm. I have to say I am not quite seeing what others are on Albright...... has he done well? Yes - but he still looks like a practice squad player to me at this stage. A lot of people whose views I respect on this bard are high on him but I am not quite there at this stage. He has got some push on some plays and been completely neutralised on others and his edge setting (certainly against the Colts) was inconsistent. I haven't watched Saturday night back for the 2nd time yet, which tends to be when I refine opinions because you do miss things first time round watching the ball but I'm not sold on Albright as a guy for the 53.

Why is it you see Striker making the 53? I agree that Albright could be practice squads but if given the option between the two UDFAs, I think Albright sticks and Striker doesn't.

Posted

Why is it you see Striker making the 53? I agree that Albright could be practice squads but if given the option between the two UDFAs, I think Albright sticks and Striker doesn't.

 

I think it comes down to two factors for me:

 

1. Striker has more positional versatility.

2. I think he might be more likely to get picked up between us cutting him and re-signing him to the PS.

 

I might be wrong on both, but that is how I see it right now.

Posted

 

Hmm. I have to say I am not quite seeing what others are on Albright...... has he done well? Yes - but he still looks like a practice squad player to me at this stage. A lot of people whose views I respect on this bard are high on him but I am not quite there at this stage. He has got some push on some plays and been completely neutralised on others and his edge setting (certainly against the Colts) was inconsistent. I haven't watched Saturday night back for the 2nd time yet, which tends to be when I refine opinions because you do miss things first time round watching the ball but I'm not sold on Albright as a guy for the 53.

 

I'm the president of the Albright fan club and even I'd rather see him get a redshirt year on the PS to add weight and refine technique. The problem is that outside of Jerry, we've got almost nothing in terms of pass rush. Lawson, Biermann, Alexander are different versions of the same guy when it comes to pressure. Useful in their given roles but if Shaq misses 8 games, I think they'd get 3-4 sacks between them in relief.

 

Bryson is a spark plug and he's all action. If there's no solid option available after rosters get cut down, I'm carrying him as a wild card. If it's a direct fight between him and Striker, give me the NFL frame. Albright's biggest knock is his weight but his play strength isn't terrible.

Posted (edited)

 

I think it comes down to two factors for me:

 

1. Striker has more positional versatility.

2. I think he might be more likely to get picked up between us cutting him and re-signing him to the PS.

 

I might be wrong on both, but that is how I see it right now.

I think for both it them, it'll be their special teams play.

 

For as much hype as Stryker has gotten, I haven't seen much from him.

Edited by Wayne Cubed
Posted

 

I think it comes down to two factors for me:

 

1. Striker has more positional versatility.

2. I think he might be more likely to get picked up between us cutting him and re-signing him to the PS.

 

I might be wrong on both, but that is how I see it right now.

 

I'll just offer this -- both players went undrafted, but only one has "jumped off the tape" in the eyes of many observers.

Posted

I've seen a lot of 53 man roster projections and this has to be the worst one.

 

Gay is not going to make this team.

 

Little has been too good to cut.

 

R. Johnson sucks. He's not makin' it.

 

C. Anderson has done nothing.

Posted

I've seen a lot of 53 man roster projections and this has to be the worst one.

 

Gay is not going to make this team.

 

Little has been too good to cut.

 

R. Johnson sucks. He's not makin' it.

 

C. Anderson has done nothing.

 

Then, boy, are you going to love mine. :lol:

Posted (edited)

My latest update:

 

QB (3) - T. Taylor, E. Manuel, C. Jones

RB (4) - L. McCoy, M. Gilislee, R. Bush, J. Williams

FB (1) - J. Felton

WR (6) - S. Watkins, R. Woods, M. Goodwin, G. Salas, W. Powell, G. Little

TE (3) - C. Clay, C. Gragg, J. Dray

OT (4) - C. Glenn, J. Mills, C. Kouandjio, S. Henderson

OG (3) - R. Incognito, J. Miller, R. Groy

C (1) - E. Wood

K (1) - D. Carptenter

P (1) - C. Schmidt

LS (1) - G. Sanborn

DL (3) - C. Bryant, A. Washington, J. Worthy

DT (3) - K. Williams, C. Walker, L. Edwards

EDGE (5) - J. Hughes, M. Lawson, L. Alexander, B. Albright, K. Biermann

LB (4) - P. Brown, Z. Brown, B. Spikes, D. Hawthorne

CB (5) - S. Gilmore, R. Darby, N. Robey-Coleman, C. White, K. Seymour

S (5) - A. Williams, C. Graham, R. Blanton, C. Anderson, D. Williams

PUP - S. Lawson, M. Easley

RES/SUS - M. Dareus

IR - R. Ragland, I. Enemkpali

Edited by thebandit27
Posted

My latest update:

 

QB (3) - T. Taylor, E. Manuel, C. Jones

RB (4) - L. McCoy, M. Gilislee, R. Bush, J. Williams

FB (1) - J. Felton

WR (6) - S. Watkins, R. Woods, M. Goodwin, G. Salas, W. Powell, G. Little

TE (3) - C. Clay, C. Gragg, J. Dray

OT (4) - C. Glenn, J. Mills, C. Kouandjio, M. Lucas

OG (3) - R. Incognito, J. Miller, R. Groy

C (1) - E. Wood

K (1) - D. Carptenter

P (1) - C. Schmidt

LS (1) - G. Sanborn

DL (3) - C. Bryant, A. Washington, J. Worthy

DT (3) - K. Williams, C. Walker, A. Ta'amu

EDGE (5) - J. Hughes, M. Lawson, L. Alexander, E. Stryker, K. Biermann

LB (4) - P. Brown, Z. Brown, B. Spikes, D. Hawthorne

CB (5) - S. Gilmore, R. Darby, N. Robey-Coleman, C. White, K. Seymour

S (5) - A. Williams, C. Graham, R. Blanton, C. Anderson, D. Williams

NFI - S. Henderson

PUP - S. Lawson, M. Easley

RES/SUS - M. Dareus

IR - R. Ragland, I. Enemkpali

 

They already cut IK. Still don't see Striker making the 53.

Posted

 

They already cut IK. Still don't see Striker making the 53.

 

Bills IR'd IK after he cleared waivers.

Posted

 

They already cut IK. Still don't see Striker making the 53.

 

To be honest, with Ragland and Shaq hurt and Dareus suspended, I had trouble finding a 53rd guy for the front 7. I don't think they're going to keep 11 DBs, so it came down to identifying the DL/DT/LB/EDGE guy with the most updside/versatility, so I went with Strike.

 

I also had to stretch to find an 8th OLmen worth keeping given how poorly Velasco has played. I know he's not great, but it would be huge if Henderson could get healthy and be available; 2 backup OTs and a backup interior guy seems the way to go to me (at least with the current crop of players). Now, that may change if they feel that another interior guy from someone else's cuts is their best option.

Posted

 

Something to consider as other teams make cuts:

 

@SalSports

The Bills are approximately $6.2 million under salary cap for their top-51 before Marcell Dareus suspension cap credit/relief.

 

 

Indeed--I'd expect that they'll want to save $2M or so for seasonal transactions, but it'd be nice to see some of that money be used toward front-loading a portion of a new deal for Gilmore, so as to keep his year 2 & 3 cap hits down a bit.

Posted

 

To be honest, with Ragland and Shaq hurt and Dareus suspended, I had trouble finding a 53rd guy for the front 7. I don't think they're going to keep 11 DBs, so it came down to identifying the DL/DT/LB/EDGE guy with the most updside/versatility, so I went with Strike.

 

I also had to stretch to find an 8th OLmen worth keeping given how poorly Velasco has played. I know he's not great, but it would be huge if Henderson could get healthy and be available; 2 backup OTs and a backup interior guy seems the way to go to me (at least with the current crop of players). Now, that may change if they feel that another interior guy from someone else's cuts is their best option.

 

Wow...ask and ye shall receive!!!

 

Chris Brown ‏@ChrisBrownBills 1m1 minute ago

Bills activate Seantrel Henderson off PUP expected to practice tonight. More at http://Buffalobills.com #Bills

×
×
  • Create New...