RyanC883 Posted July 20, 2016 Posted July 20, 2016 I like the editorial to pick up Boldin, not Busch for the last piece. I still contend pick up Freeney at the minimum as well and we'll be in even better shape. He rotates with Manny Lawson and pins ears back on 3rd until Shaq is ready. Freeny would be a fantastic addition IMO. I'm fine with Bush as well, but have low expectitations. My guess is the Bills hope he can backup 5 games while K. Williams is out, and longer if they cut K. Williams if he shows up fat and out of shape after his suspension.
John from Riverside Posted July 20, 2016 Posted July 20, 2016 I am curious as to why we have not tried to bring Freeney in He was pretty good last year.
Luxy312 Posted July 20, 2016 Posted July 20, 2016 I am curious as to why we have not tried to bring Freeney in He was pretty good last year. He's good as a pass rushing specialist, but that's it. Can't cover. 37 years old. He's been a situational pass rusher for the last 3 years running. Rex likes to mix up his packages in terms of who's chasing after the QB and putting Freeney out there would tell any team that he's one guy you have to block. Just a thought.
Jauronimo Posted July 20, 2016 Posted July 20, 2016 I hope we sign him. It's been way too long since we talked about getting guys into space. Reggie Bush is the Gegarin to Spiller's Alan Shepard. I think we should sign him.
CardinalScotts Posted July 20, 2016 Posted July 20, 2016 I am curious as to why we have not tried to bring Freeney in He was pretty good last year. doesnt fit this defense at all, and he's 36.....same reason no one else has touched him
The Jokeman Posted July 20, 2016 Posted July 20, 2016 Bush would make sense as one of those after Week 1 signings that isn't guaranteed a contract type deals that is asked to step in and play 2nd fiddle to McCoy until Karlos Williams is back from suspension or possibly serve as a depth RB and primary punt returner. I think he could also give an added dimension on 3rd downs similar to what Ronnie Harmon did in his career with the Chargers. As it allow McCoy to get mileage on his tires and possibly play out his contract.
Kirby Jackson Posted July 20, 2016 Posted July 20, 2016 (edited) The only issue that I see with Bush is that he'd be 5th on the RB depth chart (4th until Karlos is back). He adds some value as a 3rd down guy and returner but won't contribute much (if anything) in the backfield. Edited July 20, 2016 by Kirby Jackson
Saxum Posted July 20, 2016 Posted July 20, 2016 Bush would make sense as one of those after Week 1 signings that isn't guaranteed a contract type deals that is asked to step in and play 2nd fiddle to McCoy until Karlos Williams is back from suspension or possibly serve as a depth RB and primary punt returner. I think he could also give an added dimension on 3rd downs similar to what Ronnie Harmon did in his career with the Chargers. As it allow McCoy to get mileage on his tires and possibly play out his contract. Absolutely agree IF he is signed he should be signed post-week 1 UNLESS he signed one of the minimum veteran contracts which qualify for salary cap discount.
NoSaint Posted July 21, 2016 Posted July 21, 2016 The only issue that I see with Bush is that he'd be 5th on the RB depth chart (4th until Karlos is back). He adds some value as a 3rd down guy and returner but won't contribute much (if anything) in the backfield. I haven't watched him much the last couple years - but think he's got the wheels left to help be an asset in the slot? He was at times dangerous motioning out of the backfield and getting iso vs a lb once upon a time
BUFFALOKIE Posted July 21, 2016 Posted July 21, 2016 The Bills don't need Reggie Bush. We gotz our team already on the roster.
Kirby Jackson Posted July 21, 2016 Posted July 21, 2016 I haven't watched him much the last couple years - but think he's got the wheels left to help be an asset in the slot? He was at times dangerous motioning out of the backfield and getting iso vs a lb once upon a timeThat's what I'd see his role as. I loved him in motion when he was here. Some of those gimmicky type things (jet sweeps, etc...).
WotAGuy Posted July 21, 2016 Posted July 21, 2016 That's what I'd see his role as. I loved him in motion when he was here. Some of those gimmicky type things (jet sweeps, etc...). Right - we just need to get him in space.....worked for Spiller!
Kirby Jackson Posted July 21, 2016 Posted July 21, 2016 Right - we just need to get him in space.....worked for Spiller!If you are even considering him that has to be the plan. He can't do anything else, but has done that well in the NFL.
YoloinOhio Posted July 21, 2016 Author Posted July 21, 2016 Bringing him into camp, if they even sign him, isn't guaranteeing him a spot on the 53. It's adding veteran depth in case of injury and getting him in early enough so he knows the offense and gets the reps in case we need him. If he can't play anymore well enough to contribute, he won't make the team. It's a low risk signing IMO.
mikemac2001 Posted July 21, 2016 Posted July 21, 2016 Bringing him into camp, if they even sign him, isn't guaranteeing him a spot on the 53. It's adding veteran depth in case of injury and getting him in early enough so he knows the offense and gets the reps in case we need him. If he can't play anymore well enough to contribute, he won't make the team. It's a low risk signing IMO. Sounds like it makes sense and if he does make the team he deserved a spot...I'm kind of blah on the deal but I think in this offense big plays can happen and he is a big play back
Deranged Rhino Posted July 21, 2016 Posted July 21, 2016 Reggie Bush is the Gegarin to Spiller's Alan Shepard. I think we should sign him.
Saxum Posted July 21, 2016 Posted July 21, 2016 That's what I'd see his role as. I loved him in motion when he was here. Some of those gimmicky type things (jet sweeps, etc...). Right - we just need to get him in space.....worked for Spiller! That worked for the Bills at the time because of the blocking scheme and a QB able to make the short passes over the middle. I see nothing from last year indicating such an offense will be a staple of game this year.
Kirby Jackson Posted July 21, 2016 Posted July 21, 2016 That worked for the Bills at the time because of the blocking scheme and a QB able to make the short passes over the middle. I see nothing from last year indicating such an offense will be a staple of game this year. I don't disagree at all. I'm just saying that IF you are considering Reggie Bush you must be planning on using him for that. Otherwise he is useless. He's not really a RB. The Bills have at least 4 guys on the roster that are better RBs (once Karlos is back). Bush can offer value in the pass game, return game and in space. That's it though.
machine gun kelly Posted July 21, 2016 Posted July 21, 2016 I read the comments replying to my post on Freeney, but to say he's not part of the scheme is not accurate as he had 9 sacks in 11 games in a two point stance with the Cardinals. They run the 3-4, and Freeney shined. He was on a bad Chargers team the previous two years. He is a great filler while we wait for Shaq, and a great mentor for Shaq upon his return. His spin move is legendary. As far as the other editorial from the BN, I like Boldin as an addition more than Busch. Just because Karlos is out, you have a very promising draft pick in J. Williams who won't get suspended until 2017 for the DUI. The only unknown is McCoy really more injured than we thought with the ankle thing from OTA's. If he's truly healthy, McCoy, J.Williams, and Gilleslie can handle the load for four games. Use the veteran money on Boldin on offense, and Freeney on defense.
NoSaint Posted July 21, 2016 Posted July 21, 2016 (edited) I don't disagree at all. I'm just saying that IF you are considering Reggie Bush you must be planning on using him for that. Otherwise he is useless. He's not really a RB. The Bills have at least 4 guys on the roster that are better RBs (once Karlos is back). Bush can offer value in the pass game, return game and in space. That's it though.and, assuming he has any tread left on the tires, i think roman would have some fun with him. hes the type of guy you can roll out a 1 RB, 1 TE, 3 WR formation, and based on what the defense gives have packages to suddenly lineup 5 wide with him and clay, for instance. and personally i think when given the opportunity he was a little bit better of a runner than you give credit for (he had a 3 year run averaging about 225 carries and 1000 yards) so you could still keep clay tight and have a run game with that personnel set. but hes 31, and coming off a leg injury so ill again say im not strongly advocating - just talking about the type of roles he could fill. if its vet min, and we can cut him in august - im not opposed to taking a shot. Edited July 21, 2016 by NoSaint
Recommended Posts