Jump to content

Chris Hogan credits Marcus Easley with work ethic/approach


Recommended Posts

The article doesn't really describe at all what he and Easley actually did together, other than share some catch phrases.

 

Anyway, the article describes Easley as "the 5th year WR out of UConn", yet doesn't even hint at the irony that the undrafted college lacrosse player is the only NFL WR in the story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The article doesn't really describe at all what he and Easley actually did together, other than share some catch phrases.

 

Anyway, the article describes Easley as "the 5th year WR out of UConn", yet doesn't even hint at the irony that the undrafted college lacrosse player is the only NFL WR in the story.

 

Barely. Easley was more valuable to the team as a ST'er than Hogan was as a WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Barely. Easley was more valuable to the team as a ST'er than Hogan was as a WR.

 

 

By what measure?

 

450 yards receiving, 2 TDs, 12.5 per catch (second on the team), 18 1st downs (50% of his catches). All for a 4th receiving option?

 

What is it Easley did? Made some tackles on kick returns?

Edited by Mr. WEO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

By the measure that he's one of the better gunners in the league and Hogan's production has been minimal.

 

That's like saying he is one of the best stamp collectors in the league.

 

What was the impact of his 10 tackles (3 fewer than Meeks and tied for 37th in the NFL)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's like saying he is one of the best stamp collectors in the league.

 

What was the impact of his 10 tackles (3 fewer than Meeks and tied for 37th in the NFL)?

 

A gunner's impact goes beyond just tackles. Never mind the irony in you thinking that 36 catches for 450 yards and 2 TD's is any sort of impact whatsoever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

A gunner's impact goes beyond just tackles. Never mind the irony in you thinking that 36 catches for 450 yards and 2 TD's is any sort of impact whatsoever.

 

 

Not huge, but of course it was. As a 3rd or 4th option, he was productive. What was the greater impact Easley had on the team, beyond tackles?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not huge, but of course it was. As a 3rd or 4th option, he was productive. What was the greater impact Easley had on the team, beyond tackles?

 

You know what a gunner does, right? And Hogan's production could literally be replaced by anyone. Hell Easley had half his TD's in 1 catch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You know what a gunner does, right? And Hogan's production could literally be replaced by anyone. Hell Easley had half his TD's in 1 catch.

Hogan's production can be replaced by anyone, but Easley.

 

A decent gunner vs a #3 WR. What a battle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Easley trained Hogan like Little Mac's trainer did in Mike Tyson's Punch Out

 

Side note: Jim Caldwell--the HC of the Lions--looks eerily similar to Doc Louis--Mac's trainer from Mike Tyson's Punch Out

 

Jim-Caldwell-Looks-Like-Hes-Concerned-Fo

11582f1db7fb59d2515c09b305ea72cf-300x225

Edited by thebandit27
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It's funny. WEO never had anything good to say about Hogan...until the Pats signed him.

Im not sure arguing he's more valuable than Easley is THAT good

 

If he's said other things I didn't notice them but this seems more anti-Easley than pro-hogan here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It's funny. WEO never had anything good to say about Hogan...until the Pats signed him.

 

 

This so profoundly false that it's not worth citing the posts. Typical doc historical revision. All made up for obfuscation.

 

Easley could sit-in the sidelines on every return coverage and the Bills would be no worse off than they were.

Hogan's production can be replaced by anyone, but Easley.

 

A decent gunner vs a #3 WR. What a battle.

 

 

boom....

 

FC for the win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one remembers him saying he didn't put as much into last season thinking he didn't need it?

 

"Maybe I relaxed a bit the year before when I thought I had a good year and proved myself a little bit"

 

 

http://bills.buffalonews.com/2016/02/23/how-chris-hogan-is-preparing-to-fight-for-his-job-with-the-bills/

This is taking Hogan's words out of context in a pretty nasty way. Anyone who doesn't think that Hogan was a dedicated Bill should have their head examined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is taking Hogan's words out of context in a pretty nasty way. Anyone who doesn't think that Hogan was a dedicated Bill should have their head examined.

The quotes are correct enough.

But it was Hogan saying he needed to up his effort. This all with his very real injury issue. I expected to see he and Tyrod get some timing in this year.

 

Chris Hogan. How many time did we see him open enough last year and years under marrone ?

Too many probably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hogan's production can be replaced by anyone, but Easley.

 

A decent gunner vs a #3 WR. What a battle.

 

Yeah, he probably could. That's less a comment on Easley's WR'ing prowess than Hogan's lack of it.

 

Im not sure arguing he's more valuable than Easley is THAT good

 

If he's said other things I didn't notice them but this seems more anti-Easley than pro-hogan here.

 

It's not just here but elsewhere. And why be anti-Easley to begin with?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...