Mr. WEO Posted June 8, 2016 Posted June 8, 2016 The article doesn't really describe at all what he and Easley actually did together, other than share some catch phrases. Anyway, the article describes Easley as "the 5th year WR out of UConn", yet doesn't even hint at the irony that the undrafted college lacrosse player is the only NFL WR in the story.
Doc Posted June 8, 2016 Posted June 8, 2016 The article doesn't really describe at all what he and Easley actually did together, other than share some catch phrases. Anyway, the article describes Easley as "the 5th year WR out of UConn", yet doesn't even hint at the irony that the undrafted college lacrosse player is the only NFL WR in the story. Barely. Easley was more valuable to the team as a ST'er than Hogan was as a WR.
Mr. WEO Posted June 8, 2016 Posted June 8, 2016 (edited) Barely. Easley was more valuable to the team as a ST'er than Hogan was as a WR. By what measure? 450 yards receiving, 2 TDs, 12.5 per catch (second on the team), 18 1st downs (50% of his catches). All for a 4th receiving option? What is it Easley did? Made some tackles on kick returns? Edited June 8, 2016 by Mr. WEO
Doc Posted June 8, 2016 Posted June 8, 2016 By what measure? By the measure that he's one of the better gunners in the league and Hogan's production has been minimal.
Mr. WEO Posted June 9, 2016 Posted June 9, 2016 By the measure that he's one of the better gunners in the league and Hogan's production has been minimal. That's like saying he is one of the best stamp collectors in the league. What was the impact of his 10 tackles (3 fewer than Meeks and tied for 37th in the NFL)?
Doc Posted June 9, 2016 Posted June 9, 2016 That's like saying he is one of the best stamp collectors in the league. What was the impact of his 10 tackles (3 fewer than Meeks and tied for 37th in the NFL)? A gunner's impact goes beyond just tackles. Never mind the irony in you thinking that 36 catches for 450 yards and 2 TD's is any sort of impact whatsoever.
Mr. WEO Posted June 9, 2016 Posted June 9, 2016 A gunner's impact goes beyond just tackles. Never mind the irony in you thinking that 36 catches for 450 yards and 2 TD's is any sort of impact whatsoever. Not huge, but of course it was. As a 3rd or 4th option, he was productive. What was the greater impact Easley had on the team, beyond tackles?
Doc Posted June 9, 2016 Posted June 9, 2016 Not huge, but of course it was. As a 3rd or 4th option, he was productive. What was the greater impact Easley had on the team, beyond tackles? You know what a gunner does, right? And Hogan's production could literally be replaced by anyone. Hell Easley had half his TD's in 1 catch.
Doc Posted June 9, 2016 Posted June 9, 2016 im excited for a good doc vs weo showdown It's funny. WEO never had anything good to say about Hogan...until the Pats signed him.
jr1 Posted June 9, 2016 Posted June 9, 2016 Easley trained Hogan like Little Mac's trainer did in Mike Tyson's Punch Out
FireChan Posted June 9, 2016 Posted June 9, 2016 You know what a gunner does, right? And Hogan's production could literally be replaced by anyone. Hell Easley had half his TD's in 1 catch. Hogan's production can be replaced by anyone, but Easley. A decent gunner vs a #3 WR. What a battle.
thebandit27 Posted June 9, 2016 Posted June 9, 2016 (edited) Easley trained Hogan like Little Mac's trainer did in Mike Tyson's Punch Out Side note: Jim Caldwell--the HC of the Lions--looks eerily similar to Doc Louis--Mac's trainer from Mike Tyson's Punch Out Edited June 9, 2016 by thebandit27
NoSaint Posted June 9, 2016 Posted June 9, 2016 It's funny. WEO never had anything good to say about Hogan...until the Pats signed him. Im not sure arguing he's more valuable than Easley is THAT good If he's said other things I didn't notice them but this seems more anti-Easley than pro-hogan here.
Augie Posted June 10, 2016 Posted June 10, 2016 So, any word on Easley and his recovery/expected return? Hoping for all the best for that guy!
Mr. WEO Posted June 10, 2016 Posted June 10, 2016 It's funny. WEO never had anything good to say about Hogan...until the Pats signed him. This so profoundly false that it's not worth citing the posts. Typical doc historical revision. All made up for obfuscation. Easley could sit-in the sidelines on every return coverage and the Bills would be no worse off than they were. Hogan's production can be replaced by anyone, but Easley. A decent gunner vs a #3 WR. What a battle. boom.... FC for the win.
Rocky Landing Posted June 10, 2016 Posted June 10, 2016 No one remembers him saying he didn't put as much into last season thinking he didn't need it? "Maybe I relaxed a bit the year before when I thought I had a good year and proved myself a little bit" http://bills.buffalonews.com/2016/02/23/how-chris-hogan-is-preparing-to-fight-for-his-job-with-the-bills/ This is taking Hogan's words out of context in a pretty nasty way. Anyone who doesn't think that Hogan was a dedicated Bill should have their head examined.
3rdand12 Posted June 10, 2016 Posted June 10, 2016 This is taking Hogan's words out of context in a pretty nasty way. Anyone who doesn't think that Hogan was a dedicated Bill should have their head examined. The quotes are correct enough. But it was Hogan saying he needed to up his effort. This all with his very real injury issue. I expected to see he and Tyrod get some timing in this year. Chris Hogan. How many time did we see him open enough last year and years under marrone ? Too many probably.
Doc Posted June 10, 2016 Posted June 10, 2016 Hogan's production can be replaced by anyone, but Easley. A decent gunner vs a #3 WR. What a battle. Yeah, he probably could. That's less a comment on Easley's WR'ing prowess than Hogan's lack of it. Im not sure arguing he's more valuable than Easley is THAT good If he's said other things I didn't notice them but this seems more anti-Easley than pro-hogan here. It's not just here but elsewhere. And why be anti-Easley to begin with?
Recommended Posts