\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted June 7, 2016 Posted June 7, 2016 http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/Irving-Police-Pedestrian-Struck-By-As-Many-As-12-Vehicles-While-Crossing-Highway-183-382070781.html
DC Tom Posted June 7, 2016 Posted June 7, 2016 (edited) Something similar happened down here a few years ago. Police got a report of a deer carcass on 95. They come to remove it, turns out it's the torso of a woman who tried to cross 95 (because that's safe) and got hit by a semi, and torn apart so badly that no one noticed it was a person's body. "Several" (because !@#$ you, gugny) people hit the "deer carcass" before anyone called it in. Edited June 7, 2016 by DC Tom
Gugny Posted June 7, 2016 Posted June 7, 2016 Something similar happened down here a few years ago. Police got a report of a deer carcass on 95. They come to remove it, turns out it's the torso of a woman who tried to cross 95 (because that's safe) and got hit by a semi, and torn apart so badly that no one noticed it was a person's body. About eight people hit the "deer carcass" before anyone called it in. How did they quantify the number of vehicles that hit the torso before it was called in?
DC Tom Posted June 7, 2016 Posted June 7, 2016 How did they quantify the number of vehicles that hit the torso before it was called in? I don't remember. It was certainly an approximation, possibly based on the distance between body parts.
Cugalabanza Posted June 7, 2016 Posted June 7, 2016 ...an approximation, possibly based on the distance between body parts. I believe this is the same methodology Poojer applies in the "Would Ya" threads.
Jauronimo Posted June 7, 2016 Posted June 7, 2016 I believe this is the same methodology Poojer applies in the "Would Ya" threads. It least its an objective and quantifiable method that leads to consistent and repeatable results.
Beerball Posted June 7, 2016 Posted June 7, 2016 I don't remember. It was certainly an approximation, possibly based on the distance between body parts.When I read "about 8" I was able to ascertain that the number was an approximation. Others...not so much apparently.
4merper4mer Posted June 7, 2016 Posted June 7, 2016 It least its an objective and quantifiable method that leads to consistent and repeatable results. True, but it is also an unnecessary step. I've summarized it in a before and after flowchart: Before: Measure distances between body parts ---------> long ------------> Yes | | | --------->short ------------> Yes After: Yes See how much time that saves?
Gugny Posted June 7, 2016 Posted June 7, 2016 When I read "about 8" I was able to ascertain that the number was an approximation. Others...not so much apparently. Then why not say, "several?"
DC Tom Posted June 7, 2016 Posted June 7, 2016 Then why not say, "several?" Because I remembered that's what the story said. Had I witnessed it, I would have given you the exact number of cars or, had I not witnessed the cars, said nothing. But I'm not relying on my own accurate observations of the accident, I'm relying on my own accurate observations of a story written by somebody who did so poorly in journalism school that they're covering traffic accidents in the Baltimore-Washington corridor.
Gugny Posted June 7, 2016 Posted June 7, 2016 Because I remembered that's what the story said. Had I witnessed it, I would have given you the exact number of cars or, had I not witnessed the cars, said nothing. But I'm not relying on my own accurate observations of the accident, I'm relying on my own accurate observations of a story written by somebody who did so poorly in journalism school that they're covering traffic accidents in the Baltimore-Washington corridor. What was the cause of death?
DC Tom Posted June 7, 2016 Posted June 7, 2016 What was the cause of death? Probably your posts. They make anyone want to jump in front of a !@#$ing truck.
Beerball Posted June 7, 2016 Posted June 7, 2016 Then why not say, "several?" Well, I didn't say anything, but, knowing what a stickler you are for only sticking to the facts in all things I understand your feelings.
Marv's Neighbor Posted June 7, 2016 Posted June 7, 2016 Because I remembered that's what the story said. Had I witnessed it, I would have given you the exact number of cars or, had I not witnessed the cars, said nothing. But I'm not relying on my own accurate observations of the accident, I'm relying on my own accurate observations of a story written by somebody who did so poorly in journalism school that they're covering traffic accidents in the Baltimore-Washington corridor. Yeah, yeah, yeah....with the VIN numbers of course.
BringBackFergy Posted June 7, 2016 Posted June 7, 2016 Probably your posts. They make anyone want to jump in front of a !@#$ing truck. ...or a Versa Note (look it up).
Beef Jerky Posted June 7, 2016 Posted June 7, 2016 Texas really is hardcore in the points system. Male on highway is 10 points.
Recommended Posts