IDBillzFan Posted September 29, 2016 Share Posted September 29, 2016 (edited) Is Clinton the only one of these people with a brain? I'd be willing to bet Johnson would look smarter about world leaders if he ran a multi-million dollar pay-to-play foreign money laundering scheme called "a charitable foundation" that spends 95% of it's "donations" on "operational expenses." But alas, Johnson just doesn't have that kind of brain I guess. Stupid Johnson probably wouldn't even know how to take foreign money to get a uranium deal with Russia. Stupid, stupid Johnson. Edited September 29, 2016 by LABillzFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted September 29, 2016 Share Posted September 29, 2016 (edited) What I find amazing, okay not that amazing. Johnson was a Republican Gov. from New Mexico... Split terms I think too. ...Now NM shifted to a Blue State. Is that like a hetero dude converting a chick to a dyke after a bad break-up? Wait... Is this mic on? Ooops, damn PC crowd. Edited September 29, 2016 by ExiledInIllinois Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sodbuster Posted September 29, 2016 Author Share Posted September 29, 2016 (edited) What I find amazing, okay not that amazing. Johnson was a Republican Gov. from New Mexico... Split terms I think too. ...Now NM shifted to a Blue State. Is that like a hetero dude converting a chick to a dyke after a bad break-up? Wait... Is this mic on? Ooops, damn PC crowd. New Mexico has been more blue than red. They voted for Clinton twice, Gore in 2000, and Obama both times. If I'm not mistaken, he was the first governor re-elected in state history. Not to mention their current governor is a Republican. And no, they were consecutive terms. I'd be willing to bet Johnson would look smarter about world leaders if he ran a multi-million dollar pay-to-play foreign money laundering scheme called "a charitable foundation" that spends 95% of it's "donations" on "operational expenses." But alas, Johnson just doesn't have that kind of brain I guess. Stupid Johnson probably wouldn't even know how to take foreign money to get a uranium deal with Russia. Stupid, stupid Johnson. Yeah. Maybe he's the smart one, by virtue of knowing not to stick our nose in the beehive over and over again. Edited September 29, 2016 by sodbuster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin Franklin Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 I'd be willing to bet Johnson would look smarter about world leaders if he ran a multi-million dollar pay-to-play foreign money laundering scheme called "a charitable foundation" that spends 95% of it's "donations" on "operational expenses." But alas, Johnson just doesn't have that kind of brain I guess. Stupid Johnson probably wouldn't even know how to take foreign money to get a uranium deal with Russia. Stupid, stupid Johnson. Not going to defend Clinton but the point about Johnson is nevertheless valid. Read some newspapers dude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 Did anyone ever figure out which former Mexican president Gary admired (and why?) but couldn't name? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 (edited) Detroit newspaper endorses Gary Johnson The Detroit News has been around since 1873. Until now, it has never endorsed a non-Republican for president (it endorsed no one in two of FDR’s races and sat out the Bush-Kerry contest in 2004). This year, though, the Detroit News is has endorsed Gary Johnson for president. Of Donald Trump it says: The 2016 nominee offered by the Republican Party rubs hard against the editorial board’s values as conservatives No sh*t. ADDED: THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE ENDORSES GARY JOHNSON: “This year neither major party presents a good option.” No sh*t (again) . Edited September 30, 2016 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sodbuster Posted September 30, 2016 Author Share Posted September 30, 2016 Detroit newspaper endorses Gary Johnson The Detroit News has been around since 1873. Until now, it has never endorsed a non-Republican for president (it endorsed no one in two of FDRs races and sat out the Bush-Kerry contest in 2004). This year, though, the Detroit News is has endorsed Gary Johnson for president. Of Donald Trump it says: The 2016 nominee offered by the Republican Party rubs hard against the editorial boards values as conservatives No sh*t. ADDED: THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE ENDORSES GARY JOHNSON: This year neither major party presents a good option. No sh*t (again) . The Chicago Tribune is the eighth most widely circulated paper in the country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 Not going to defend Clinton but the point about Johnson is nevertheless valid. Read some newspapers dude. Which newspapers? LA Times? NY Times? Washington Post? Daily News? Which newspaper would be the best one for me to understand that Johnson has no brain. Please let me know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin Franklin Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 Which newspapers? LA Times? NY Times? Washington Post? Daily News? Which newspaper would be the best one for me to understand that Johnson has no brain. Please let me know. You misread my comment. "Read some newspapers" was a shot at Johnson, who might know a foreign leader worth admiring if he picked up a newspaper every once in a while. Even reading Newsweek would get him through that question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 You misread my comment. "Read some newspapers" was a shot at Johnson, who might know a foreign leader worth admiring if he picked up a newspaper every once in a while. Even reading Newsweek would get him through that question. I'd rather be led by a person who doesn't know all these foreign leaders than by a person who is openly on the take with them in a money-laundering scheme. But that's just me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 You misread my comment. "Read some newspapers" was a shot at Johnson, who might know a foreign leader worth admiring if he picked up a newspaper every once in a while. Even reading Newsweek would get him through that question. True. Since he only entered politics in 1994. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 Did anyone ever figure out which former Mexican president Gary admired (and why?) but couldn't name? Santa Ana? Oh wait, that might be Trump. The Chicago Tribune is the eighth most widely circulated paper in the country.Johnson has more newspaper endorsements than Trump! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin Franklin Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 I'd rather be led by a person who doesn't know all these foreign leaders than by a person who is openly on the take with them in a money-laundering scheme. But that's just me. That's the moral dilemma this year. Jesus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 Which newspapers? LA Times? NY Times? Washington Post? Daily News? Which newspaper would be the best one for me to understand that Johnson has no brain. Please let me know. Sounds like he borrowed Sarah Palin's library card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 Isn't the big thing getting a third party 10% so they get funded for next election??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 That's the moral dilemma this year. Jesus. There's no moral dilemma there. It's easy. If you vote for Hillary, you have no freaking morals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sodbuster Posted September 30, 2016 Author Share Posted September 30, 2016 Isn't the big thing getting a third party 10% so they get funded for next election???5% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 5% So does that mean that if the Greens get 5% of the vote, they get access to federal funds? Or does it mean that if they get 5% of the vote, Congress changes the limit to 10%? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 Gee, I thought you ran for President to become President. I guess the important thing is getting federal Taxpayers funding. Good God, we need to flush out D.C. No, not Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 5% Libertarians running @ 7% now... Greens, paltry 1%... As per OC's Buddy Nate Silver @ 538.com... Laughing... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts